On TV.com: 2009's Most PIRATED TV Show
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

February 22nd, 2006

MacBook Pro Photoshop benchmarks

Posted by Jason D. O'Grady @ 5:00 am

Categories: Adobe, Intel, MacBook Pro, Software

Tags:

photoshop-bench.jpgI’ve run some benchmarks on Apple’s new MacBook Pro running an application that hasn’t been optimized for the Intel chip yet - Adobe’s notoriously resource intensive Photoshop CS.

For the test I ran two Photoshop actions on my PowerBook G4 1.5GHz and on my MacBook Pro 2.0GHz. Both are similarly configured with 2GB of RAM and 120GB (5400RPM) hard drives. For the purposes of these tests both machines were booted into clean OS X user accounts with no other applications running. Photoshop guru Will Hammond created the actions and provided me with benchmarks for his TiBook 1GHz with 1GB RAM and 100GB HDD for comparison.

The first action creates a Kaleidoscope (pictured) from and existing image of a bolt. This action has scaling, rotation and blurring.

The second action takes a 10MB image and scales it losslessly to about 550MB. It does so in 110% steps with sharpening in between. To create the 550MB file it tortures the processor, RAM and HDD.

The results are very interesting… (Shorter times are better)

Test 1- Kaleidoscope

PBG4 1.5GHz    ->     0:29:59 (0 min, 29 sec)
MBP 2.0GHz      ->     0:42:87
TiBook 1GHz      ->    1:08:00

Test 2 - Bali Girl

PBG4 1.5GHz    ->     2:16:00 (2 min, 16 sec)
MBP 2.0GHz      ->     4:03:00
TiBook 1GHz      ->    6:45:00

There’s a pretty big performance hit in Photoshop CS2 with the MacBook Pro when compared to the Aluminum PowerBook G4 due to the Rosetta emulation. MacBook Photoshop performance falls somewhere between the TiBook 1GHz and PowerBook G4 1.5GHz.

Jason D. O'GradyJason D. O'Grady is the editor of PowerPage.org, which has been publishing daily mobile technology news since December 1995. For disclosures on Jason's industry affiliations, click here or to view Jason's full profile click here.

Email Jason D. O'Grady

Subscribe to The Apple Core via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 20 Talkback(s)
Your bet - based on what?
Come on Murph. We need to be scientific here. PowerPC vs Intel benchmarks on variety of real world applications have already been done. Taking the same source, re-compiling. With Intel far surpass... (Read the rest)
Posted by: DevGuy_z Posted on: 12/22/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Try running native apps...  Fred Fredrickson | 02/22/06
The point is....  infinitewilll | 02/22/06
Give it a rest  ITTech001 | 02/22/06
I think you might have misunderstood  infinitewilll | 02/22/06
Thanks  tic swayback | 02/22/06
Wait  swisswuff | 02/22/06
Yep  tic swayback | 02/22/06
Thanks  e_ticket | 02/23/06
A suggestion  murph_zZDNet Moderator | 02/22/06
possibly  doh123 | 02/23/06
and you don't think Intel OS X use SSE?  Mikael_z | 02/25/06
sure  doh123 | 03/03/06
Suggest that to the BareFeats guys  Fred Fredrickson | 02/25/06
Your bet - based on what?  DevGuy_z | 12/22/06
Fantastic Even Under Emulation...  Kelmon | 02/22/06
CoreDuo Windows performance  lrivers | 02/23/06
I've been playing a bit with CS9...  Feldwebel Wolfenstool | 02/24/06
MacBook Pro or Power  WetcoastBob | 02/26/06
software on newer machines  Mr_Dave | 03/02/06
Try test with Windows XP on Mac.  bongomundo | 12/11/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here