On GameSpot: 54.2% of Xbox 360s fail - Report
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 6th, 2006

MacBook Pro benchmarks: launch times

Posted by Jason D. O'Grady @ 5:00 am

Categories: Benchmark, MacBook Pro, Software

Tags:

The MacBook Pro is unquestionably faster than the PowerBook G4 it replaces, but exactly how much depends on how you use it. Apple sells the MacBook Pro as "up to four times the horsepower of the PowerBook G4" but that’s purely based on the SPECint and SPECfp benchmarks from Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC). Apple’s benchmarks were compiled using the IBM compiler and a beta version of the Intel compiler for Mac OS.

But SPEC benchmarks don’t tell the whole story. I tested one aspect of the MacBook Pro’s speed that affects me daily and is a better barometer of real world performance: application launch times. I benchmarked the MacBook Pro (2.0GHz) against a PowerBook G4 (1.5GHz) while launching 14 (native and Rosetta) applications and here are the results…

The first three benchmarks are Mac OS 10.4.5 boot times from being completely shut down. The rest are application launch times (in seconds) for both a PowerBook G4 (1.5GHz, 2GB RAM, 120GB HDD) and a MacBook Pro (2.0GHz, 2GB RAM, 120GB HDD). Overall the MacBook Pro boots twice as fast as the PowerBook G4 and applications launch about a third faster - and it sure feels like it.

  PBG4 MBP
Cold Boot to Apple Logo 19:00 06:00
Cold Boot to Blue Desktop 45:00 22:00
Cold Boot to Login Screen 50:00 25:00
iPhoto 6.0.2 02:19 01:31
iWeb 1.0.1 02:13 01:50
iMovie HD 6.0.1 02:90 02:00
iDVD 6.0.1 05:15 04:81
GarageBand 3.0.1 09:00 06:78
Pages 2.0 09:62 05:94
Keynote 3.0.0 16:81 02:44
Safari 2.0.3 04:22 01:30
Mail 2.0.8 06:78 02:50
Address Book 4.0.3 05:00 02:40
iTunes 6.0.4 02:06 01:12
iCal 2.0.3 04:15 02:09
Photoshop CS2 (9.0×191) 28:34 46:10
ImageReady CS2 (9.0×191) 10:69 12:75

 

Launch times were measured with a stopwatch in a new Mac OS X user account from the time the application was clicked in the dock to the time the application was ready for user interaction. Three launches were recorded and the high and low times were thrown out.

Jason D. O'GradyJason D. O'Grady is the editor of PowerPage.org, which has been publishing daily mobile technology news since December 1995. For disclosures on Jason's industry affiliations, click here or to view Jason's full profile click here.

Email Jason D. O'Grady

Subscribe to The Apple Core via Email alerts or RSS.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 68 Talkback(s)
you mean you can't wait 5 seconds for an app to open..
..but you'll spend hours on end posting on this site?!

wink... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Spicoli's Avenger Posted on: 04/04/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Benchmarks  dogeared | 03/06/06
Yes the Rosetta Apps launch slower  Jason D. O'GradyZDNet Moderator | 03/06/06
Who cares about launch times?  NonZealot | 03/06/06
Or boot times, really  tic swayback | 03/06/06
Boot to application launch  mrlinux | 03/06/06
Same here  People | 03/06/06
Haven't tested the sleep time yet...  Jason D. O'GradyZDNet Moderator | 03/06/06
Ummm, people that open and close apps all day long.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/06/06
Again not so much an issue  tic swayback | 03/06/06
Maybe, maybe not...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/06/06
I think there are better measures  tic swayback | 03/06/06
I thought it was a good test b/c some launch times are veeeeeery long  Jason D. O'GradyZDNet Moderator | 03/06/06
you mean you can't wait 5 seconds for an app to open..  Spicoli's Avenger | 04/04/06
It's a good measure of the user experience  Jason D. O'GradyZDNet Moderator | 03/06/06
PBG4 Times??  robertp366@... | 03/06/06
Logically  mikeybrass | 03/06/06
Times are in Seconds and Fractions of Seconds  Jason D. O'GradyZDNet Moderator | 03/06/06
Times are in seconds...  Jason D. O'GradyZDNet Moderator | 03/06/06
Launch times and price  Chad_z | 03/06/06
More info on this here  tic swayback | 03/06/06
Try out-of-the-box PB too & tell us the difference between 512Mb & 2Gb RAM  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
You point? I mean everyone knows more memory is better so?  Laff | 03/06/06
Message has been deleted.  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
Well first of all you did not say anything about PC's in your first post.  Laff | 03/06/06
Summary of what you wrote: 1. You live in jungle and read no news ...  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
Um technically I don't think animals talk per se.  Laff | 03/06/06
Watch Animal Planet/read books like King Solomon's Ring, Konrad Lorenz (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
Well yes they can and do give signals and make grunts and calls  Laff | 03/07/06
Humans do  voska | 03/07/06
If Laff knows of nothing about a thing - it doesn?t exist, right? (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/07/06
By jov I think he's got it!!! You are correct Vily!  Laff | 03/07/06
Oh Laff, you returned to your Darwin?s roots ? monkey. Good boy Laff. (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/07/06
Can I have a bananna now? I do so like bananna's YUM!  Laff | 03/07/06
Mac has an interesting effect - it degraded Laff to a monkey. (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/09/06
Well Laff I much prefer reading your posts than Vile Vily's  stevey_d | 03/06/06
It?s because replying to me requires thinking, to Laff ? not. Read more ..  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
do you think that is typical?  stevey_d | 03/06/06
Yes!!!!!!!  tic swayback | 03/06/06
I (and many) have similar results on many Mac vs. PC tests ? Mac is junk.  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
You're saying that you tested the Mac...  tic swayback | 03/06/06
Tic you're unable to distinguish you illusions from reality.Read again (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
No time to read again Vily..  tic swayback | 03/06/06
Tic you were so stupid to recognize that was not a parody but truth. (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
What am I going to do with you Vily?  tic swayback | 03/06/06
ITic, if you?d have half a brain ? you?d check it but you did not ...  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
Me? First and most important I just like the Mac.  Laff | 03/06/06
So Laff your important message is you like Mac & that?s why Mac is good (NT  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
Well you did ask.... did you not?  Laff | 03/06/06
Laff, please, estimate the value of your opinion (it?s based on your words)  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
it'snot my word but my frustration that I claim to have value, and  Laff | 03/07/06
Maybe your writing is smart for hamsters, but not for humans...  Vily Clay | 03/07/06
Avoiding frustration is the essence of common sense.  Laff | 03/07/06
?Avoiding frustration? is what animals do everyday subconsciously.  Vily Clay | 03/07/06
So simple even you can understand Vily....:)  Laff | 03/07/06
Laff, I already know that Mac turned you into a monkey. (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/09/06
If you deleted this message ? it means you have benchmarks to prove that...  Vily Clay | 03/10/06
Running the SAME software on different hardware does tell you something  stevey_d | 03/06/06
Since ZDNet editors have both Mac and PC - ...  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
I don't think majority users use 512 MB of ram...  Laff | 03/06/06
Joe average has no clue he has to spend extra $hundreds on RAM for his Mac  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
Joe Average will likely be purchasing an iBook or Mac Mini.  Laff | 03/06/06
When Joe average will upgrade Mac mini to compete with a $500 PC ...  Vily Clay | 03/06/06
In theory you will not have to purchase a montor for the Mac Mini  Laff | 03/07/06
Laff try to read your reply again and if possible try to think harder durin  Vily Clay | 03/07/06
The best LIES have some truths in the mix.....  Laff | 03/07/06
Laff, how many brains it needs to check what I wrote here?  Vily Clay | 03/07/06
I think it would take time and effort more than anything.  Laff | 03/07/06
I see - basic tests are a too complicated task for MacMonkey's brains. (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/09/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here