On BNET: Online porn struggles for profits
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 3rd, 2009

Trent Reznor responds to NIN app denial

Posted by Jason D. O'Grady @ 7:16 pm

Categories: App Store, iPhone

Tags: Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Apple Inc., App, Trenr Reznor, Digital Music, Digital Media, Personal Technology, Consumer Electronics, Jason D. O'Grady

The Nine Inch Nails iPhone app nin: access has generated a lot of interest from fans since it was first previewed then released in mid-April.

An updated version (1.0.3) of nin: access was recently denied access to the App Store for “objectionable content.” Reznor tweeted that it was rejected because of The Downward Spiral, later tweeting “Not even sure where to start with that one.”

Reznor tonight responded in more detail to the rejection in a post to the NIN forums. In it he points out the hypocrisy of his app’s rejected for objectionable content while the exact same song is available for purchase in the iTunes store.

He compares Apple’s apparent random censorship of apps (while music gets a free pass) to the situation artists had with Wal-Mart a few years back:

I’ll voice the same issue I had with Wal-Mart years ago, which is a matter of consistency and hypocrisy. Wal-Mart went on a rampage years ago insisting all music they carry be censored of all profanity and “clean” versions be made for them to carry. Bands (including Nirvana) tripped over themselves editing out words, changing album art, etc to meet Wal-Mart’s standards of decency - because Wal-Mart sells a lot of records.

NIN refused, and you’ll notice a pretty empty NIN section at any Wal-Mart. My reasoning was this: I can understand if you want the moral posturing of not having any “indecent” material for sale - but you could literally turn around 180 degrees from where the NIN record would be and purchase the film “Scarface” completely uncensored, or buy a copy of Grand Theft Auto where you can be rewarded for beating up prostitutes. How does that make sense?

You can buy The Downward F—ing Spiral on iTunes, but you can’t allow an iPhone app that may have a song with a bad word somewhere in it. Geez, what if someone in the forum in our app says F— or C—? I suppose that also falls into indecent material.

And he’s right.

Apple rejects Tweetie and nin: access, but approves Baby Shaker? I don’t get it. it’s almost as if Apple is using automated tools to approve submitted apps.

Jason D. O'GradyJason D. O'Grady is the editor of PowerPage.org, which has been publishing daily mobile technology news since December 1995. For disclosures on Jason's industry affiliations, click here or to view Jason's full profile click here.

Email Jason D. O'Grady

Subscribe to The Apple Core via Email alerts or RSS.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 5 Talkback(s)
RE: Trent Reznor responds to NIN app denial
Just another reason to go with the (already better phone) Android operating system.

The G1 is already better than the iPhone- especially with it's firmware 1.5 out. And Google has no desire to censor apps available on it.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: trance2tec Posted on: 05/07/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
RE: Trent Reznor responds to NIN app denial  smaffei | 05/04/09
So? Who really cares about this "solution?"  Jeremy W | 05/04/09
RE: Trent Reznor responds to NIN app denial  phatkat | 05/05/09
Why do I want to keep this iphone anymore??  ~Obelix~ | 05/05/09
RE: Trent Reznor responds to NIN app denial  trance2tec | 05/07/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement
Click Here

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here