On mySimon: Spiewak Durand Jacket
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

June 9th, 2009

ZFS support falls off of Snow Leopard Server's feature list?

Posted by David Morgenstern @ 12:01 pm

Categories: 10.6, Server

Tags: File System, Apple Inc., Apple Mac OS X, Operating Systems, Software, Apple Mac OS, David Morgenstern

Various Mac OS X Server lists noted on Tuesday morning that support for ZFS is gone from Apple’s public feature lists, including the previous command line option.

James Relph noted the change:

Looks like it’s gone, someone noticed on the zfs macosforge list http://zfs.macosforge.org/trac/wiki last night and I can’t find any confirmation of it’s continued existence in Snow Leopard Server apart from a few (presumably out of date) mentions on non-US Apple sites. From what I’ve heard it’s not even going to be there as an included CLI option, but I’ve not seen anything official.

A number of readers were concerned about Apple’s plans for a next-generation file system, such as Dave Pooser, manager of information services at Alford Media.

> If by ‘quasi-skeptical,’ that I don¹t view it as magical, and
>perfect for every possible use, then yes. I am. It is a good tool,
>but it¹s not the second coming of the PonyCorn.

Everything has tradeoffs. ZFS trades off processor utilization and disk space for data integrity. For file servers/ database servers/ email servers, and for many workstations, that’s PonyCorntacular. And when you look at how far behind state of the art HFS+ has fallen, Apple really needs to start delivering on some sort of next-gen filesystem pretty darn soon.

I’ll put a call into Apple about ZFS in Snow Leopard Server and will post an update if the story changes.

David MorgensternDavid Morgenstern has covered the Mac market and other technology segments for 20 years. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.


Email David Morgenstern

Subscribe to The Apple Core via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 24 Talkback(s)
...and ZFS is a 128 bit filesystem
ZFS = Zetabyte File System. (Read the rest)
Posted by: 914four Posted on: 06/28/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
What do you call this? I can't remember.  NonZealot | 06/09/09
The Problem is that its Apple  jdbukis@... | 06/09/09
A Vista moment?  Richard Flude | 06/09/09
Thats right... deflect  JoeMama_z | 06/09/09
Where's the deflection?  Richard Flude | 06/10/09
reread your post  rtk | 06/27/09
Yes  honeymonster | 06/10/09
The point being some Mac fanbois constantly fault Microsoft for...  ye | 06/10/09
Yes, both sides of such "arguments"  macadam | 06/10/09
Sounds like, this blog was a peep!  jorjitop | 06/12/09
no need for a new file system?  pard | 06/10/09
...and ZFS is a 128 bit filesystem  914four | 06/28/09
Value on client side  tech_walker | 06/10/09
Re: What do you call this? I can't remember.  vince7@... | 06/10/09
NonZealot! What's the prize! I have the answer! EnvyWare!  No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 06/11/09
Hmm.  isulzer | 06/09/09
That is an interesting question  macadam | 06/10/09
RE: ZFS support falls off of Snow Leopard Server's feature list?  divebus | 06/09/09
It shouldn't.  phatkat | 06/10/09
You *should* be able to mount ZFS on FUSE with OSX  no_zd_user_name | 06/10/09
ZFS Question  lostarchitect | 06/10/09
ZFS  NonZealot | 06/10/09
Re: ZFS-Question  leudoc2 | 06/12/09
Try this site:  914four | 06/28/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here