On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Things You Should Buy at Walmart
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

November 14th, 2008

Papermaster countersues; IBM to put up $3M

Posted by Sam Diaz @ 11:33 am

Categories: Apple, General, IBM, Legal, iPhone

Tags: Apple Inc., Agreement, IBM Corp., Papermaster, Sam Diaz

In keeping up with the latest developments of the IBM-Papermaster-Apple legal saga, now comes word via Information Week that Mark Papermaster, the veteran IBM executive trying to defect to Apple, has filed a countersuit against Big Blue, alleging that non-compete clause he signed with IBM is irrelevant because Apple and IBM aren’t director competitors. In a nutshell, Papermaster doesn’t think IBM has any reason to worry. From his lawsuit (PDF):

Mr. Papermaster has honored and intends to continue to honor his agreement not to disclose any confidential IBM information. Indeed, when Mr. Papermaster accepted the offer at Apple, he signed an Intellectual Property Agreement in which he agreed not to disclose or bring onto Apple property any “confidential, or proprietary, or secret information” of IBM.

And even if the two companies were closer competitors, Papermaster says the non-compete agreement is way too broad and the one-year time limitation is unreasonably long, especially in tech time - where a lot can happen in a year. (Click excerpt to enlarge)

Papermaster excerpt 1

Furthermore, even if the agreement really isn’t too broad or the time limit isn’t too long, the agreement only applies to work in New York state - Big Blue’s home turf - and not in Texas, where Papermaster was doing his work for Big Blue, or in California, where Apple is located.

So, to be clear, there are three solid reasons right there why IBM is wrong to try to uphold that agreement and should let Papermaster start working on the iPod and iPhone for Apple ASAP - or so says Papermaster.

Previous coverage:

Could it be that the courts think Papermaster has some legitimate arguments. In related news, the courts have ordered IBM to cough up $3 milion for a bond (PDF)  to cover any costs or damages Papermaster might suffer if things go his way in the legal battle.

Papermaster excerpt 2

Sam Diaz

Sam Diaz is a senior editor at ZDNet. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Sam Diaz

Subscribe to Between the Lines via Email alerts or RSS.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 13 Talkback(s)
RE: Papermaster countersues; IBM to put up $3M
What the hell happened on the 18th? Common its almost been a week. Who's covering this case? I want the courts opinion already!... (Read the rest)
Posted by: DHillsAbbott Posted on: 11/24/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Copied text from two images to make it readable for screen readers  Grayson Peddie | 11/14/08
Papermaster is wrong and knows it, weak attempt  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/16/08
Guilty of what?  tem.digital | 11/17/08
IBM is wrong, and the court knows it.  JonathonDoe | 11/17/08
RE: Papermaster countersues; IBM to put up $3M  eweingartner@... | 11/17/08
RE: Papermaster countersues  trm1945 | 11/17/08
Don't sign something you don't mean  eweingartner@... | 11/17/08
There are two issues here  bmerc | 11/18/08
Easier said than done  mystic100 | 11/19/08
RE: Papermaster countersues; IBM to put up $3M  Update victim | 11/17/08
RE: Papermaster countersues; IBM to put up $3M  inbread | 11/17/08
What if  Merlin the Wiz | 11/17/08
RE: Papermaster countersues; IBM to put up $3M  DHillsAbbott | 11/24/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

advertisement
Click Here

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here