On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

April 6th, 2009

Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route

Posted by Larry Dignan @ 2:31 am

Categories: General, Hardware Infrastructure, Sun

Tags: Sun Microsystems Inc., IBM Corp., Cloud Computing, Larry Dignan

Sun Microsystems won’t be acquired by IBM after all. Now the explaining—mostly to customers and shareholders—really begins.

Sun will tell its customers that the IBM deal was just a slight detour and that the company’s plan to be a pivotal hardware, cloud computing and software provider remains intact. The big question is whether customers will buy Sun’s talk—not to mention Sun’s gear. For shareholders, Sun has to explain why it split over the IBM offer.

Shareholders aren't too pleased with Sun this morning.

Shareholders aren't pleased with Sun.

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal is reporting Sun’s board is split (Techmeme). CEO Jonathan Schwartz wants the IBM deal. Chairman and Sun founder Scott McNealy doesn’t. Guess who wins that one? McNealy, who is dead wrong by the way, will return armed with quips and probably bring the company back to its hardware roots. It won’t matter. But Sun customers only need to know one thing: Schwartz’s strategy (see the stack at right) focusing the company on software is in flux.

Schwartz gave Sun a software spin. McNealy may change that approach.

Given reports that Sun had been shopping itself around and could only find IBM as a suitor, there’s a decent chance that the company will remain independent for a bit. However, any customer buying from Sun will have to consider the ramifications of a purchase. For instance, if you’re about to buy Sun hardware and HP is in the running why wouldn’t you opt for the latter just to eliminate some uncertainty. After all, HP could buy Sun. What about cloud services? Will you trust your cloud to a company that has a tug-of-war underway over a buyout?

Look for Dell, IBM and any other Sun rival to pounce with the fear, uncertainty and doubt game. In the grand scheme of things Sun was small potatoes for IBM. For Sun, the failure of the IBM-Sun talks was huge.

Every question about Sun will come back to the company’s future plans. Do you buy Sun’s roadmap five years out? Do you assume that Sun’s cloud services will ultimately be absorbed elsewhere?

Given recent events, a tech buyer would be foolish not to incorporate Sun’s future owner—and management—into any buying plans and use the IBM flap as leverage.

Larry DignanLarry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and Editorial Director of ZDNet sister site TechRepublic. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Email Larry Dignan

Subscribe to Between the Lines via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 78 Talkback(s)
You talk of financials, but have no fundamentals.

They do not sell hardware.
That was in the past.

They now sell IT solutions.
They record this as hardware sales because *THEIR SOFTWARE IS FREE* gasp.
... (Read the rest)
Posted by: jhskim Posted on: 04/14/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Collapse or posturing?  linuser | 04/06/09
Egos - vs - Organization  kd5auq | 04/06/09
Thank You Scott MacNealy!  F4A6Pilot@... | 04/06/09
Steve Jobs 2.0 ?;-)  catmedia | 04/06/09
T2 and Solaris 10 are enough  ideamatters | 04/06/09
I would not call Solaris 10 "a great leap"  wackoae | 04/06/09
I would -  enigmaforce | 04/06/09
Google to buy ?  Alan Smithie | 04/06/09
RE:Google to buy ?  qvtech | 04/06/09
Google uses Dell?  914four | 04/06/09
Many companies that sell appliances rebrand Dell boxes.  B.O.F.H. | 04/06/09
Actually...  914four | 04/06/09
Depends where you have worked.  B.O.F.H. | 04/06/09
IF Sun is merged with anyone, it is very likely to be google.  jhskim | 04/06/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  michael.burgess@... | 04/06/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  F4A6Pilot@... | 04/06/09
Couldn't disagree more  dwjunix | 04/06/09
Abandoned?  lostark98 | 04/06/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  jjr@... | 04/06/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  jjr@... | 04/06/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  IT-NUT | 04/06/09
VERY GOOD!  MrViklund | 04/06/09
Um...  wolf_z | 04/06/09
Sun will rise again  The Management consultant | 04/06/09
So, you say that SUN would be better off in Europe  Roque Mocan | 04/07/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  fmosuch@... | 04/06/09
The other choice could be bankruptcy  scotth_z | 04/06/09
oh really?  jhskim | 04/07/09
Yes... really  scotth_z | 04/07/09
You really don't understand anything, do you?  jhskim | 04/14/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  GAGendel | 04/06/09
Irrellevant  Jim__J | 04/06/09
The almighty American shareholder  croberts | 04/06/09
this is not about shareholders or "quick-buck capitalism"  tahoe_blue | 04/06/09
Thank you...  lostark98 | 04/06/09
Good post  914four | 04/06/09
point taken about strictly proprietary CPU  tahoe_blue | 04/07/09
Try Leading-Edge!  ideamatters | 04/06/09
Re. Reading  lostark98 | 04/06/09
I do not need to read about it second hand -- I *did* it !  tahoe_blue | 04/08/09
SPARC/Solaris is Proactive  vision@... | 04/06/09
Was there ever a real offer? Has the deal really been killed?  ron@... | 04/06/09
I see M$ dirty fingerprints all over  Linux Geek | 04/06/09
Mr. Gates deserves some credit: SCO was Xenix, an early Microsoft product!  ideamatters | 04/06/09
Tarentella (old SCO) licenced Xenix from Microsoft.  B.O.F.H. | 04/06/09
You can see?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/06/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  richard@... | 04/06/09
PA-RISC -- manufactured by IBM  michael.burgess@... | 04/06/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  insanish1 | 04/06/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  cnaw@... | 04/06/09
I said that when Sun tried to go open source  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/06/09
dumb  super_J | 04/06/09
How much are they making from  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/06/09
Actually, you're dumb.  jhskim | 04/07/09
Sun is principally a hardware company.  B.O.F.H. | 04/06/09
sun WAS a hardware company.  jhskim | 04/07/09
still IS a hardware company  scotth_z | 04/07/09
You talk of financials, but have no fundamentals.  jhskim | 04/14/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  The Management consultant | 04/06/09
How do you know?  lostark98 | 04/06/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  Bobby Joe Reed | 04/06/09
Just to remind you: August 16, 1993 / July 1, 1997  Burana | 04/06/09
Sun and Microsoft  Kenogami | 04/06/09
Sun will bankrupt in couple months if...  Gradius2 | 04/06/09
I doubt it  914four | 04/06/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  Burana | 04/06/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  atari_z | 04/06/09
Announcement?  lostark98 | 04/06/09
Sun deal collapse: could it beeee...  fvm | 04/06/09
It shouldn't be that difficult...  enigmaforce | 04/06/09
You shouldn't be using Solaris.  jhskim | 04/07/09
Well  enigmaforce | 04/07/09
Pay for it? or a sunset?  Ming Kang | 04/06/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  wgrimes | 04/06/09
Pyrrhic Victory- what Scott McNealy wasn't aware -Will Google take over?  reachsankar | 04/06/09
RE: Sun following the IBM deal collapse: Customer confusion en route  nem37@... | 04/07/09
I wonder if Apple would want to buy Sun? (nt)  zkiwi | 04/07/09
Apple to Buy Sun ?  JohnRMartin | 04/07/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here