On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Things You Should Buy at Walmart
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

August 16th, 2005

Oops. That DVD should have caused the toilet to flush.

Posted by David Berlind @ 3:40 pm

Categories: General, Hardware Infrastructure, Personal Technology, Wired & Wireless

Tags:

Today, while driving my 15 year-old home from a doctor’s appointment, I asked him what he thought should happen when you stick a DVD into a computer. "That’s obvious Dad.  It should give me the option to play it" he said.  It’s obvious to me to and millions of other people who are probably used to seeing the same thing happen when they put a CD into their computers or attach a digital camera to their USB port.  But today, in asserting that it has a legitimate patent on the idea of autoplaying a DVD when someone sticks in a computer,  Intervideo sued Dell for patent infringement.  According to the report filed by News.com’s Michael Singer:

InterVideo, located in Fremont, Calif., is asking the court to enjoin Dell from manufacturing, selling or importing products that infringe patents tied to its Linux-based InstantOn technology. The software allows a DVD to automatically start playing a movie when a user inserts a disc into a computer running an InterVideo program. The suit concerns U.S. Patent No. 6,765,788.

My initial reaction was that it must be a mistake or there must be a bug in Dell’s systems.  Surely, Dell meant to activate the flushing mechanism in the nearest toilet via Wi-Fi. (Note that I categorized this blog post under Wired & Wireless.)  

In an exchange of e-mails with Intervideo’s public relations counsel Andy Marken, I was told that Intervideo has a patent on the autoplay technology as well as a codec (compressor/decompressor — commonly used for storing video).  But Marken confirmed that the infringement suit has nothing to do with the codec.  Although the anti-patent community will surely lash me with a wet noodle, I can accept that there’s a patent on something as complicated as a codec.  A lot of work, research, and development goes into one of those.  But into an autoplay technology? Puh-leeze.  I’m sure there was work involved.   But I’m not willing to accept an any claim that it was non-trivial when compared to something like a codec (not to mention that any 15-year-old will tell you that a DVD should autoplay when it’s stuck into a computer).  Marken hasn’t gotten back to me on that.

When I told my 15-year-old what was going on and how Intervideo probably wants Dell to pay it royalties for every computer it sells that can autoplay a DVD, he said with perfect 15-year-old indignance, "That’s dumb.  Every computer does that.  What do they think? They can get money from all of them for something so simple?"  Answer: Yes.

Unfortuantely, a precedent could mean that Dell is on shakey ground.  Intervideo apparently sued Acer for the same thing and, according to a Reuters story, the case was settled to Intervideo’s satisfaction.  On the other had, Acer isn’t an American company.  Dell is and it’s the world’s top computer maker (based on marketshare data).  Although Dell refuses to comment on litigation, my hope is that Dell doesn’t lay down and die on this one.  Sooner or later, the line has to be drawn on completely frivolous patents and my sense is that this is one of them. Either that, or the world is going to become a very boring place (see attempted satire). 

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 24 Talkback(s)
Older ones waited
My first two video players (old enough to be large, heavy and silver) both waited until you pressed the play button before playing, but the feature is indeed pretty standard for any produced in the last decade or so.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: wookey Posted on: 08/19/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
I thought patents must not be "obvious"  george_ou | 08/16/05
I think you mean is  Patrick Jones | 08/16/05
Actually...  rapson | 08/17/05
Good one  Patrick Jones | 08/17/05
Neutral is the nice way of saying...  Zinoron | 08/17/05
Why this happens  tic swayback | 08/17/05
The USPTO make no money for rejecting....  figgle | 08/17/05
What about prior art?  Roger Ramjet | 08/17/05
Even...  IT_Critic | 08/18/05
Even earlier prior art  Sir_Chancealot | 08/17/05
I've always hated that feature  voska | 08/17/05
Older ones waited  wookey | 08/19/05
Even earlier than my previous post  Sir_Chancealot | 08/17/05
autorun shouldn't even exist anyway  Pelger | 08/17/05
AUTOEXEC.EXE  Palmyra | 08/17/05
Precident  Roger Ramjet | 08/17/05
I want the patent on the process of filing software patents  coffeenite | 08/17/05
Sorry, not new and novel...  Zinoron | 08/17/05
Then I want the patent on creating mediocre posts  coffeenite | 08/17/05
The Patent Office  Update victim | 08/17/05
Patent Office ?? Knowledge?? of the law  Update victim | 08/17/05
Lame lame lame lame lame lame  snilmn | 08/17/05
Isn't it the hardware...  IT_Critic | 08/18/05
Well  urapns | 08/18/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here