On Metacritic: Who will grab the Best Picture trophy?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

July 22nd, 2009

Apple can't seriously be "very happy" with AT&T relationship

Posted by Sam Diaz @ 3:00 am

Categories: AT&T, Apple, General, Mobile, Smartphones, iPhone

Tags: Apple iPhone, Relationship, AT&T Corp., Apple Inc., Customer Satisfaction, Product Marketing, Smart Phones, Marketing, Consumer Electronics, Personal Technology

If you’re Apple and you sell 5.2 million iPhones in the third quarter, then you’re probably feeling just fine about that exclusive carrier agreement that you have with AT&T in the U.S. After all, look at the numbers. Apple beats Wall Street again - even in the midst of one of the worst economic periods in generations. And much of the company’s success points right at the iPhone.

But what if you’re not Apple and instead are a customer or potential customer. There are plenty of iPhone owners who comment on these blog posts about their dissatisfaction with the AT&T service. There are plenty of others - myself included - who go on and on about how we would buy an iPhone in a heartbeat if it were offered through another carrier (Verizon being the first choice.)

Also see: AT&T: The iPhone’s anchor

The noise has become so loud that even Washington is looking into carrier exclusivity agreements, making it hard to believe that anyone - especially execs at Apple HQ - is unaware of this problem. And yet, on yesterday’s earnings call, COO Tim Cook replied to a question about the status of the exclusive AT&T relationship by saying:

I think it’s an excellent relationship and we’re very happy with it.

Excellent? Really, Tim? And you’re very happy? Very? Isn’t that a bit over the top?

OK, from the sales perspective, maybe it is an excellent relationship and you are very happy with it. But from a PR and customer satisfaction perspective, you can’t tell me that it’s an excellent relationship. If customer satisfaction is suffering because of the relationship (which it is), then the relationship isn’t excellent - especially for a company that puts customer satisfaction as a high priority.

With all of that said, I never expected to hear Tim Cook cough up an answer like: “It sucks and we can’t wait to get out of it either.” Nor did I expect him give up too much information with an answer like: “We have put AT&T on notice in regard to the service and are reviewing our carrier options.” I would have been shocked if he had given up any sort of detail about the Apple-AT&T partnership on an earnings conference call.

But something about the answer he did give was, I don’t know… too upbeat and kind of oblivious to a problem that actually does exist with AT&T.  You don’t have to go into great detail about it and you certainly don’t have to bad-mouth a partner, but at least acknowledge the service issues.

Apple had a good day yesterday - and for good reason. They make products that are so good that consumers are willing to pay a premium price to have one - even in this economy. But I also hope they come away from this recognizing that the AT&T partnership is a problem and it needs to be addressed. You don’t have to acknowledge it or go into great detail about it - but don’t insult our intelligence by telling us that it’s an “excellent” relationship.

Sam Diaz

Sam Diaz is a senior editor at ZDNet. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Sam Diaz

Subscribe to Between the Lines via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 49 Talkback(s)
RE: Apple can't seriously be
I really have to hand it to people who don't understand technology and go about stating that CDMA is dead and that GSM is the future. What nonsense... The next stage in the technology for wireless cel... (Read the rest)
Posted by: krustykanuck Posted on: 08/21/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Sure it's a great relationship!  hickum | 07/22/09
What?  erikswanson | 07/22/09
AT$T BLOWS  terryzx | 07/22/09
Who's complaining?  Fark | 07/22/09
You're paying for them?  Morely | 07/22/09
baffling  erikswanson | 07/22/09
Why not? Verizon is not much better  itguy08 | 07/22/09
How do you know customer satisfaction is slipping?  itguy08 | 07/22/09
Please.....  sandmanfvr | 07/22/09
None of those issues here  itguy08 | 07/22/09
Same here. Everything working perfectly after 1 year of using the 3G.  No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 07/22/09
RDF not extensible?  bmgoodman | 07/22/09
RE: Apple can't seriously be  Keonidas | 07/22/09
I'm very happy  sbalun | 07/22/09
I'm Happy too  kpzdnet@... | 07/23/09
Verizon is not God  jwillum | 07/22/09
Verizon in the rear view mirror  IT_User | 07/22/09
Where did you go?  Falchion14 | 07/22/09
Objectivity and a paycheck  Anita Y. Mathis | 07/22/09
"Loyal Customer"  xXSpeedzXx | 07/22/09
Perceived Advantage only  ncted | 07/22/09
I "perceive" something too...  corymcnutt | 07/22/09
How do you know Verizon is better?  itguy08 | 07/23/09
Opinions are like?  matthew_maurice | 07/22/09
Remember how it started?  Ken_z | 07/22/09
Risk taking  oncall | 07/22/09
From a COO's perspective, the relationship probably is excellent ...  dkawalec | 07/22/09
RE: Apple can't seriously be  Steve Webb | 07/22/09
See AT&T's earnings - guess people are happy w/them  itguy08 | 07/23/09
Re: Earnings = satisfaction?  eaganj | 07/23/09
RE: Apple can't seriously be  nelley9872 | 07/23/09
Switch Back?  ManoaHI | 07/24/09
It time for Verizon to go GSM CDMA is Dead.  rjsaenz | 07/23/09
Verizon, Cricket and Sprint should use GSM and 3G  perronne | 07/23/09
Something un-rotten in the State of Denmark  aldux | 07/23/09
Prepaid Phone Card  rjsaenz | 07/23/09
CDMA is NOT dead  AtlPatrick | 08/15/09
It's all about choices...  phillyTD | 08/21/09
RE: Apple can't seriously be  jerrycothern@... | 07/23/09
AT&T is simply awful compared to Verizon  attstinks | 07/23/09
all interesting comments, so far  rahbm | 07/23/09
Here in Germany...  Steve*1* | 07/23/09
expensive  Tigertank | 07/28/09
Outside the US, it's at least as bad.  jdickey | 07/24/09
RE: Apple can't seriously be  mpflinn | 07/26/09
RE: Apple can't seriously be  nothingness | 07/27/09
AT&T pays $18 to Apple per month per iPhone customer  AtlPatrick | 08/15/09
RE: Apple can't seriously be  icboulder | 08/21/09
RE: Apple can't seriously be  krustykanuck | 08/21/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here