On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

September 3rd, 2009

CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard

Posted by Jason Hiner @ 3:00 am

Categories: Apple, IT Management, OS X

Tags: CIO, Apple Macintosh, Information Technology, Director Of Information Technology, Jury, Desktops, Hardware, Jason Hiner

The most talked about new feature in Mac OS X Snow Leopard, which debuted on August 28, is its native integration with Microsoft Exchange. The assumption was that this one feature could have the same kind of impact in opening the Mac market to corporate users as Exchange integration had on bringing the iPhone to business professionals. A new survey of TechRepublic’s CIO Jury completely debunks that assumption.

On September 1, TechRepublic polled its 90-member panel of U.S. IT executives and asked, “Does the release of Snow Leopard make your IT department more likely to adopt more Mac OS X machines?” The jury, made up of the first 12 respondents, unanimously voted “no” in a 12-0 decision.

TechRepublic’s CIO Jury is based on the original CIO Jury concept developed by Silicon.com, where you can find lively opinions from IT leaders based in the UK.

The CIO Jury for this verdict was:

  1. Laurie Dale, Director of IT for Ability Beyond Disabilty
  2. Randy Backus, Director of IT for Wallingford Public Schools
  3. Michael Woodford, Executive Director of IT for USANA Health Sciences
  4. Chuck Codling, Director of Infrastructure for Rocky Brands
  5. Michael Hanken, VP of IT for Multiquip
  6. Bob Hickcox, Director of IT for Girl Scouts of MN and WI
  7. Chuck Elliott, Director of IT for Emory University School of Medicine
  8. Lisa Moorehead, Director of IT for MA Dept of Public Utilities
  9. Chris Brown, VP of Technology for Big Splash Web Design
  10. Kevin Leypoldt, IS Director for Structural Integrity Associates
  11. Brian Stanek, VP of IT for NAMICO
  12. Jerry Justice, IT Director for SS&G Financial Services

Beyond just the 12 jury members, TechRepublic got votes and comments from over 50% of the 90-member jury pool and the overwhelming response was that Snow Leopard would have no impact on their IT infrastructure. Nearly every respondent wrote that Macs simply don’t make sense in their corporate network. A few of the IT chiefs even responded that they personally admire and respect Mac OS X (some even use it at home), but that there were too many obstacles to using it at work.

For example, Lisa Moorehead, Director of IT for the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities, responded, “I work in government. We’ve invested heavily in PCs and we don’t do a lot with graphic design nor are we an educational institution. Because of that, supporting Macs for us is more of a hassle. However, personally, I love my Mac and am very excited about this new release.”

David Van Geest, Director of IT for The Orsini Group, said, “While I have always liked the Mac OS, the expense and the necessity to run Windows-based software precludes it from consideration.”

Let’s take a look at some more of the reasons that IT executives reported for why they do not plan to adopt more Macs.

Why IT leaders still reject Macs

  • “Being a multi-discipline engineering firm, we have many applications that are Windows specific, therefore we are a Windows shop. While we do have a few Macs, adopting more Macs would require virtualization software to run Windows (i.e. Parallels) or a dual boot configuration. Introducing and supporting a second OS on every computer is not something we are looking to take on.” (Kevin Leypoldt, IS Director for Structural Integrity Associates)
  • “The Macintosh operating system is not yet a good fit for environments where compliance with federal regulations such as HIPAA and FERPA are important.” (Chuck Elliott, Director of IT for Emory University School of Medicine)
  • “Exchange support in Snow Leopard will not make it more likely we will adopt more Mac computers. Costs for Macs are still significantly higher and majority of our users and applications still require Windows.” (Donna Trivison, Director of IT for Ursuline College)
  • “We will not be considering deploying Macs. As with many of the questions I’ve fielded, it’s a matter of our key software vendors not supporting anything other than Windows for our core applications.” (John Gracyalny, Director of IT for SafeAmerica Credit Union)
  • “A lot of the applications we use here at DEKA for engineering are not supported by Mac. At this time there is no business advantage to introduce Mac’s into our environment.” (Chris Zalegowski, Director of IT for DEKA Research & Development)
  • “We’re very much a Microsoft-oriented shop. Microsoft makes pricing very, very attractive for higher education.” (Scott Lowe, CIO of Westminster College)
  • “As as general rule, ‘no,’ due to the nature of how we run applications and their dependency on ActiveX control and the Internet Explorer experience.” (Delano Gordon, CIO of Roofing Supply Group)
  • “Snow Leopard supporting Exchange integration is fine but I don’t think it’s worth introducing a new platform into the mix. Apple supporting Exchange is like Microsoft supporting Open Source. Both were late doing it and are only doing it because they cannot compete otherwise.” (Matthew Metcalfe, Director of IS for Northwest Exterminating)
  • “No, our main application does not run in Mac OS.” (Brent Nair, CIO of Wunderlich Securities)
  • “There are still overall cost and support challenges that would prevent us from adopting Macs in a big way.” (Rick Treese, CTO of TheMarkets.com)
  • “It would still take too much time and investment to retrain users and support staff.” (Chris Brown, VP of Technology for Big Splash Web Design)

A few leave the door open

  • “Snow Leopard in itself is not a driving factor, however, we are taking a more accepting approach to Macs in general. As new and younger personnel enter our organization, and as an increasing number of applications are running in the browser, the OS is is becoming less relevant. Thus, we are being more open to the requests of our user community as long as there are no significant barriers and/or potential degradations to our overall infrastructure in doing so.” (Tom Galbraith, Director of IT for US District Court So District of IL)
  • “From an IT perspective it makes little difference for us. Unless you’re a technology department that supports an advertising agency, graphics house, or anything heavy into creative media, I would think that Snow Leopard means little more than a curiosity. The ability to allow for Intel-based Macs, a few years back, provided more interesting food for thought than this latest release of OS X. For mainstream business and manufacturing I doubt that it would do much. However, I am open to interesting solutions.” (Martin Szalay, Director of IT for FWE)

Would you like to be part of TechRepublic’s CIO Jury and have your say in the hottest issues for IT departments? If you are a CIO, CTO, IT director or equivalent at a large or small company in the private or public sector and you want to be part of TechRepublic’s CIO Jury pool, drop us a line at ciojury@techrepublic.com.

Jason HinerJason Hiner is the Editor in Chief of TechRepublic, ZDNet's sister site. Read his blog Tech Sanity Check at hiner.techrepublic.com. You can also find him on Twitter, LinkedIn, and JasonHiner.com.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 104 Talkback(s)
Finally, some common sense
Apple really doesn't care that much about the corporate market. Its business model is to build the hardware and OS itself, there is no way Apple could supply say 25% of the PC market, even if allowed ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Fred Fredrickson Posted on: 09/06/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Wow, how wrong can you be?  iTeaBoy | 09/03/09
That was the assumption in the market and the tech industry  Jason HinerZDNet Moderator | 09/03/09
That's my point  iTeaBoy | 09/03/09
someone is seeming defensive.  daMan25 | 09/03/09
Very wrong  iTeaBoy | 09/03/09
Apple is simply too successful these days  Mikael_z | 09/03/09
Apple is just a real loser company, same as its users  WinMacLinux | 09/03/09
Haha. Let`s wake you up to reality , shall we :  NeoGeneration | 09/03/09
You're joking, right?  John Zern | 09/03/09
not enough  someitguy79 | 09/03/09
I agree.  JM1981 | 09/03/09
Read the article....  sean_hando@... | 09/03/09
I did read it..  someitguy79 | 09/03/09
small businesses will try SL... or just skip to Google  bglad | 09/03/09
wrong for a different reason  Linux Geek | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  Sleeper Service | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  dmilne@... | 09/03/09
Tight IT budgets is right.  HollywoodDog | 09/03/09
Nope...  Sleeper Service | 09/03/09
Are?  UsernameRequired | 09/03/09
Why do you think 40% of IT directors "are" going to Win7 1 yr?  HollywoodDog | 09/03/09
But then again  John Zern | 09/03/09
True. But a Win 7 upgrade required hardware too  HollywoodDog | 09/04/09
not true I think...  keoz | 09/04/09
50%, Results to the same jury.  NeoGeneration | 09/03/09
But it does sound as though  GuidingLight | 09/03/09
Not Run out but yes  bobiroc | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  djmik | 09/03/09
The two who are "open" to OSX...  roystonlodge | 09/03/09
Typical  frgough | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  jakenhauser23 | 09/03/09
2007: "CIOs hit the snooze button on Vista."  vikingnyc@... | 09/03/09
Except it seems that quite a few...  Sleeper Service | 09/03/09
You are correct  dheady@... | 09/03/09
You are incorrect  bobiroc | 09/04/09
Wow. That was such a lame excuse  GuidingLight | 09/03/09
Wake me when Apple begins to care about the "Enterprise"  zkiwi | 09/03/09
Finally, some common sense  Fred Fredrickson | 09/06/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  Blad_Rnr | 09/03/09
Hi it's 2009!  Sleeper Service | 09/03/09
to me 'bloat' is a big deal  paladin2 | 09/03/09
re. to me 'bloat' is a big deal  mike151984 | 09/03/09
You don't know....  doh123 | 09/04/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  dfl274 | 09/03/09
Why the hell does this guy do this.  JM1981 | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  DannyO_0x98 | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  dfl274 | 09/03/09
Its the bigger picture for IT Dept  jscott418 | 09/03/09
Because CIOs Are Clueless  itanalyst2@... | 09/03/09
CIOs are frugal ...  kd5auq | 09/03/09
Oh the humanity!!!  James T. Kirk | 09/03/09
They are all indoctrinated into the Windows mindset  mlindl | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  dfl274 | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  stevejg61 | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  cosuna | 09/03/09
Mac OS will NEVER become Enterprise due to Apple Users  WinMacLinux | 09/03/09
Translation :  NeoGeneration | 09/03/09
Yes and I know Apple users...  bobiroc | 09/03/09
As Onion News puts it in the "Macbook Wheel " "story"  NeoGeneration | 09/03/09
News Flash: Cab company auto directors wont upgrade  HollywoodDog | 09/03/09
Inane  jragosta | 09/03/09
Kinda like cops using BMWs instead of Crown Vics!  kd5auq | 09/03/09
HA!  odcchaz | 09/03/09
IT as Gatekeeper vs. Partner  cwkoller2@... | 09/03/09
Right.  Average-IT-Guy | 09/04/09
3 IMacs at work. 1800$ each.  NeoGeneration | 09/03/09
Yup  bobiroc | 09/03/09
Yup  jragosta | 09/04/09
Apple is not a better computer  bobiroc | 09/04/09
Steriotyped  odcchaz | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  caffeinated-cheesehead | 09/03/09
Why is everyone so obsessed with enterprise?  odcchaz | 09/03/09
@odcchaz  Axsimulate | 09/03/09
Group Policy and Active Directory  Takalok | 09/03/09
Not Very Well  bobiroc | 09/03/09
Just learn to use google  gtdavies33@... | 09/03/09
Sure its that easy huh?  bobiroc | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  mike151984 | 09/03/09
Industry hits the snooze button on CIOs  Storagebear | 09/03/09
I'll tell you why they reject it: They are LOCKED in  mlindl | 09/03/09
An insurer in the UK still uses Windows 95!  mlindl | 09/03/09
The tail trying to wag the dog  tonymcs@... | 09/03/09
Hit the snooze button on this article.  matthew_maurice | 09/03/09
"We already drank the koolaid..."  bwojcik | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  Marshman | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  Marshman | 09/03/09
There you go - Not Interested  jpr75_z | 09/03/09
Interesting  rdawson@... | 09/04/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  czarembo@... | 09/03/09
Bribes  jragosta | 09/04/09
In Some Cases  bobiroc | 09/04/09
No clue what you are talking about  sjaak327 | 09/04/09
BS  jragosta | 09/04/09
Windows Security  bobiroc | 09/04/09
Are you sure  sjaak327 | 09/04/09
How many...  keoz | 09/04/09
Let them  bobiroc | 09/04/09
I'd love to implement Mac OS X...  wright_is | 09/03/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  pjtmgt@... | 09/04/09
Snow Leopard not a windows killer  shanee25 | 09/04/09
RE: CIOs hit the snooze button on Snow Leopard  dshulkin@... | 09/04/09
If someone really evaluated this survey...  doh123 | 09/04/09
Thats pretty simple to grasp  bobiroc | 09/04/09
Yep..  keoz | 09/04/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

advertisement
Click Here

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More