On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

September 18th, 2009

Was Apple a "Liar Liar" to the FCC about the Google Voice app?

Posted by Sam Diaz @ 10:10 am

Categories: AT&T, Apple, Google, Government, iPhone

Tags: FCC, Google Inc., Apple Inc., Federal Government, Smart Phones, Government, Consumer Electronics, Personal Technology, Sam Diaz

If this were a schoolyard, Apple would be that kid that everyone is pointing to and chanting “Liar, liar, pants on fire.”

Word is spreading fast that Apple did, in fact, reject the Google Voice app for its iPhone earlier this year, even though the company said in a statement filed with the FCC in July that, contrary to media reports, it had not yet officially rejected the app.

Now, we’re learning that that wasn’t necessarily true.

When the FCC launched its investigation, the agency requested statements from all of the parties involved - Apple, Google and AT&T. It was widely speculated that AT&T had a role in calling for the rejection of the Google Voice app but the company said in its statement that it was not involved. When the statements were released publicly, Google’s was largely redacted.

Also see: The Google Voice app scandal: is Apple losing control over the iPhone?

Today, a statement in Google’s letter was made public - at Google’s request. In it, Google said that Apple’s VP of Marketing, Phil Schiller, informed Google that the app had been rejected. In the letter (PDF), Google wrote:

Apple’s representatives informed Google that the Google Voice application was rejected because Apple believed the application duplicated the core dialer functionality of the iPhone. The Apple representative indicated that the company did not want applications that could potentially replace such functionality.

Google said it agreed to make the letter public after many news organizations filed Freedom of Information Act requests for it. In a blog post today, Google said:

While we could have asked the FCC to oppose those requests, in light of Apple’s decision to make its own letter fully public and in the interest of transparency, we decided to drop our request for confidentiality.

Apple hasn’t issued a response yet so, for all we know, there’s a reasonable explanation for the contradiction. Still, getting caught in a lie is never a good thing. It’ll be interesting to see how Apple digs itself out of this one.

Also see: Forget the iPhone app, Google Voice coming as a Web app

Sam Diaz

Sam Diaz is a senior editor at ZDNet. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Sam Diaz

Subscribe to Between the Lines via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 32 Talkback(s)
OK. To be fair.....
I haven't used anything past WinXP--and my XP experience was
quite some time ago. When I did use it, "crash-prone" was a fair
description. Perhaps Vista and Win7 are better. I hope so. The
"support quagmire" part of the statement still stands.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Userama Posted on: 09/21/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Yes, there must be an explanation other than "Apple lied... again"  NonZealot | 09/18/09
No Lie That I See  DannyO_0x98 | 09/18/09
As with Anti-trust, "restraint of trade"  rtk | 09/18/09
A pretty hard case to prove  frgough | 09/18/09
Agreed  rtk | 09/18/09
Yup, the Apple department of...  Sleeper Service | 09/19/09
Awaits the impending destruction of Google by "The Followers..."  Scrat | 09/18/09
RE: Was Apple a  Loverock Davidson | 09/18/09
right...  Linux Geek | 09/18/09
*YAWN*  GuidingLight | 09/18/09
You took the yawn right outta my mouth...  mgp3 | 09/18/09
What is the potential punishment...  eqpc | 09/18/09
Depends on how many of them you have in your pocket  Been_Done_Before | 09/18/09
The RDF to the rescue!  eggmanbubbagee@... | 09/18/09
Was that a Fruedian slip?  GuidingLight | 09/18/09
Apple lie? I'm shocked! (nt)  IT_Guy_z | 09/18/09
So, why the assumption that Apple is lying and not Google?  frgough | 09/18/09
How about reading the linked PDF, hmmm?  Qbt | 09/18/09
Must be something they coat the surfaces with.  Patanjali | 09/19/09
Right, because we all know  frgough | 09/19/09
And do you think...  Sleeper Service | 09/20/09
Why not?  zkiwi | 09/20/09
So when does the DOJ begin Anti-Trust  de-void | 09/18/09
I'm confused about this whole Google thing  Userama | 09/18/09
because it's not a shop, its a market.  rob_b30 | 09/19/09
Yeah, Imagine what they'd say if Microsoft..  JCitizen | 09/20/09
Sorry, Rob. I'm still confused. (nt)  Userama | 09/19/09
The FCC got involved because Google, the do no evil  frgough | 09/19/09
Apple cannot do "what it wants."  Solid Jedi Knight | 09/20/09
Oh, NOW I get it!  Userama | 09/20/09
RE:Oh, NOW I get it!  richdave | 09/21/09
OK. To be fair.....  Userama | 09/21/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here