On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

November 14th, 2009

Google Book Settlement revised; Open Book Alliance pans it as mere 'nip and tuck'

Posted by Larry Dignan @ 4:26 am

Categories: Amazon, Copyright issues, DOJ, General, Google, Government

Tags: Google Inc., Alliance, Settlement, Book Settlement, Litigation, Business Operations, Larry Dignan

Google, the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers have modified their digital book agreement in an effort to placate the Justice Department and critics of the deal.

Among the key items in the revised settlement, detailed on Google’s public policy blog (PDF summary):

  • The deal only covers books registered with the U.S. Copyright Office or published in the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Among the key items:
  • The new agreement addresses orphan works, which have unknown rights holders and limits what can be done with revenue garnered from these books.
  • An independent fiduciary will look out for the rights holders of these orphan works.
  • Google’s algorithm for creating competitive pricing in the book market was clarified.

It’s unclear whether the deal will mollify critics and regulators. Google’s book settlement gave the search giant permission to scan books and sell access to them for revenue sharing and a $125 million fee.

Critics, including regulators, Amazon.com and other groups, say the Google deal is anticompetitive and cover authors and publishers not covered by the Author’s Guild and Association of American Publishers.

The Open Book Alliance, which opposes the Google Books Settlement, already panned the deal. In a blog post, Open Book Alliance co-chair Peter Brantley noted:

“Our initial review of the new proposal tells us that Google and its partners are performing a sleight of hand; fundamentally, this settlement remains a set-piece designed to serve the private commercial interests of Google and its partners.  None of the proposed changes appear to address the fundamental flaws illuminated by the Department of Justice and other critics that impact public interest.

The Open Book Alliance called the latest Google book settlement merely a “nip and tuck.”

Related: Google’s book settlement: Here comes the DOJ and likely deal tweaks

Larry DignanLarry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and Editorial Director of ZDNet sister site TechRepublic. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Email Larry Dignan

Subscribe to Between the Lines via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 2 Talkback(s)
Hangers on
Seems to me most of the groups complaining want benefits without effort. Amazon, Microsoft, Yahoo, etc., and these various authors' advocates could all have intervened in the lawsuit on the grounds t... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Rick_R Posted on: 11/15/09  (Edited: 11/15/09 @ 01:17) You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Orphan works  Lerianis10 | 11/14/09
Hangers on  Rick_R | 11/15/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement
Click Here

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and