On last.fm: Lollapalooza 2009
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

January 25th, 2007

Apple digital music antitrust suit moves ahead

Posted by Larry Dignan @ 7:57 am

Categories: Apple, Entertainment, General, Personal Technology

Tags:

The Tucker v. Apple lawsuit, which alleges that Apple has used "crippleware" and other tactics to dominate digital music, is on track to be consolidated with a similar case. In addition, a series of dates have been proposed to certify the suit as a class action.

As a brief recap, Apple is being sued for not supporting Windows Media audio files and using other tactics to lock customers into its platform. Apple first tried to get the antitrust lawsuit dismissed, but the judge didn't budge. It later filed a response that scoffed at most of the claims.

In a filing Jan. 18, U.S. District Judge James Ware ordered lawyers for both parties to show why the Tucker v. Apple suit shouldn't be consolidated with a related one, Charoensak v. Apple Computer Inc.

That leaves the following key dates–outlined in a Jan. 17 filing (PDF download)–as a case road map:

–Feb. 12: Deadline for both parties to file responses on the consolidations of related cases.

–March 5: Court will conduct a hearing on consolidating cases.

–March 16: Deadline for Tucker lawyers to file and serve class certification.

–March 19: Hearing to coordinate Tucker and Charoensak class certification proceedings.

–April 20: Apple deadline to file its opposition to class action certification.

–May 11: Deadline for Tucker to reply Apple's filing.

Meanwhile, the two sides are expected to haggle over the discovery process.

Larry DignanLarry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and Editorial Director of ZDNet sister site TechRepublic. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Email Larry Dignan

Subscribe to Between the Lines via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 15 Talkback(s)
Again, you've made a case for Microsoft
Why should MS version of XML - superior, work with OSS specs - inferior? You are right, they should not have to wben view as physical objects.


Now Vista and Office 2007 are going to be usi... (Read the rest)
Posted by: xuniL_z Posted on: 01/26/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
How does the following lock you in ???  mrlinux | 01/25/07
Cassette tapes?  Ken_z | 01/25/07
I was going to use 8 Track tapes...  mrlinux | 01/25/07
A more accurate analogy...  fde101 | 01/25/07
You are correct 100% correct  mrlinux | 01/25/07
I'm with you!!!  xuniL_z | 01/25/07
While I tend to agree in theory....  Tigertank | 01/25/07
If you will notice  xuniL_z | 01/26/07
How is Zune and PlaysForSureMaybe any different?  BitTwiddler | 01/25/07
If you look at them as physical objects...  mrlinux | 01/25/07
Again, you've made a case for Microsoft  xuniL_z | 01/26/07
In the same way Windows and OSX are different  NonZealot | 01/25/07
A load of C.R.A.P.  CobraA1 | 01/25/07
The issue isnt they all play MP3's  mrlinux | 01/26/07
All antitrust laws must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 01/25/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline