On mySimon: KitchenAid Professional Stand Mixer
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 28th, 2007

Intel's Nehalem processor: Biggest leap since the Pentium Pro

Posted by Dan Farber @ 12:01 pm

Categories: AMD, General, Hardware Infrastructure, Intel

Tags:

In Focus » See more posts on: Intel

At a press gathering this morning, Pat Gelsinger, senior vice president and general manager of Intel's Digital Enterprise Group, revealed details about a next generation processor, Nehalem, which brings an entirely new microarchitecture (and motherboards), and will include onboard memory and graphics controllers.

Nehalem-based desktop, server and mobile processors and systems are slated to be available in 2008. The Nehalem effort is part of Intel's strategy to step up its chip cadence.

"The new systems architecture is a major shift is system architecture, and a stunning value proposition," Gelsinger beamed. "It's the biggest leap since the Pentium Pro [which reached the market in 1996]." It's also a big shift for those who create memory and graphic controllers, such as AMD, which just acquired ATI. 

"We will integrate the memory controller on the die, with both a buffered and native version," Gelsinger explained.  For many years, AMD's claim to fame has been its integrated memory controller, which helps to reduce latency. "We have the best memory hierarchy on planet today," Gelsinger said in response to a question about AMD's HyperTransport processor design approach. "The best cache is more important than an integrated memory controller, which is why Intel wins on benchmarks."

 

On a technical front, each core utilizes two threads and the chips are designed specifically for the 45-nanometer process, unlike the Penryn family due later this year that was a bridge between 65 and 45 nanometer. Nehalem designs are underway with eight cores, and two thread each, Gelsinger said, and the processors will exist in the same thermal envelope as previous generations. 

For software developers, Gelsinger said, "Nehalem system server applications are very throughput-oriented already and will take full advantage of the simultaneous multithreading. On client systems, we have been on a multithreaded focus since 2000, when we launched hyperthreading. Now we are reaping the benefits and seeing good parallelism in games, media and even in things like Microsoft Office 2007, but it is still heavy lifting to move the software community together to take advantage of threading." 

Gelsinger also outlined the Penryn family of processors, due in the second half of this year, that are based on the 45-nanometer Hi-k process technology and high-k + metal gate transistor design. In plain English, the Penryn family, which will include six processors (dual and quad core Core and Xeon systems for server, desktop and mobile) means chips that are faster and more energy efficient.

The 45-nanometer processors will have 820 million transistors, and the dual core die size will be 25 percent smaller than the 65-nanometer equivalent.

Dan Farber, editor-in-chief of CNET News.com, has more than 20 years of experience as an editor and journalist covering technology. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 33 Talkback(s)
Intel is not selling the processor here...
They're selling an architecture. Until Intel releases CSI, and gets it to work flawlessly, they're still recycling their decades old bus architecture that truly limits a systems throughput in real wo... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Uber Dweeb Posted on: 05/01/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Man, Intel just keeps dumping on AMD  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/28/07
It is sad  dragosani | 03/28/07
I agree  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/28/07
yes, but will they.  shryko | 03/29/07
Ya. Right.  Cayble | 03/29/07
You would know  ibabadur1 | 03/28/07
WOW, what an insightful and well articulated post.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/28/07
You can bet AMD isn't resting on its laurels  CobraA1 | 03/28/07
I agree, but can they do it?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/28/07
In desktop processors, perhaps  Michael Kelly | 03/29/07
Yet another vaporware 'release'...  Uber Dweeb | 03/28/07
Not hardly...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/28/07
"Hmmm, didn't you call their Dual Core vaporware too???"  Uber Dweeb | 03/29/07
"Another"??  -Kestrel- | 03/29/07
Really?  Uber Dweeb | 03/29/07
We should buy the vastly inferior AMD CPU I guess  Cayble | 03/29/07
Where are your benchmarks?  Uber Dweeb | 05/01/07
Intel Doublethink  meh130@... | 03/28/07
You missed this...?  SanityClause | 03/29/07
Intel's cache is bigger, not "better".  Uber Dweeb | 03/29/07
Worse cashe and still whips AMD  Cayble | 03/29/07
Intel is not selling the processor here...  Uber Dweeb | 05/01/07
I originally thought the same...  mitsuguy@... | 03/29/07
Perhaps - but I don't believe IMC and cache are the biggest bottleneck  mhyrllin@... | 03/29/07
agreed  shryko | 03/29/07
Pentium Pro (joke)  bwolf@... | 03/29/07
I thought the same but it misses the point - Pentium Pro Specs  webgecko | 03/30/07
pentium pro  alive1@... | 03/29/07
AMD out of it for mnaths already  Elder Developer | 03/29/07
Intel and Caches  meh130@... | 03/29/07
Excellent Post  Uber Dweeb | 03/29/07
AMD Rules  mcgee1115@... | 04/01/07
Interesting & Informative Thread, THANKS.  oklahomadanny@... | 04/04/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here