On mySimon: Magno Wooden AM/FM Radios
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

October 19th, 2007

Comcast's network controls: File sharing isn't Comcastic

Posted by Larry Dignan @ 8:37 am

Categories: General, Telecommunications, Web Technology, Wired & Wireless

Tags: Network, Comcast Corp., File-sharing, Internet, Peer To Peer (P2P), Networking, Internet Service Providers (ISPs), Larry Dignan

In Focus » See more posts on: Net Neutrality

Comcast, in a move to save bandwidth, is interfering with subscribers who want to swap files online.

According to the Associated Press, Comcast is discriminating against some of its subscribers. Comcast’s interference was confirmed by various tests by the AP. The strangest twist: Comcast computers masquerade as users. The big concern is that Comcast is setting a precedent for other ISPs to follow. No one in the story argues with the fact that Comcast can do anything it wants with its network.

The AP reports:

If widely applied by other ISPs, the technology Comcast is using would be a crippling blow to the BitTorrent, eDonkey and Gnutella file-sharing networks. While these are mainly known as sources of copyright music, software and movies, BitTorrent in particular is emerging as a legitimate tool for quickly disseminating legal content.

The principle of equal treatment of traffic, called “Net Neutrality” by proponents, is not enshrined in law but supported by some regulations. Most of the debate around the issue has centered on tentative plans, now postponed, by large Internet carriers to offer preferential treatment of traffic from certain content providers for a fee.

Comcast’s interference, on the other hand, appears to be an aggressive way of managing its network to keep file-sharing traffic from swallowing too much bandwidth and affecting the Internet speeds of other subscribers.

Comcast confirmed that technology is used to keep connections up and running, but denied that the cable giant blocks applications. Apparently, downloading is fine, but uploads are blocked.

My take: Once you strip out the Net neutrality banter what Comcast is doing makes sense from a network management perspective. Comcast is weak when it comes to upload bandwidth and if some guy is trying to upload a Smallville episode that’s going to hurt connection speeds for the network–and your neighbors. And given that Comcast is in a dogfight against Verizon for TV and Internet services in some areas (like mine thankfully) Comcast has to muster all the speed it can get.

The downside: That speed may give Comcast a black eye on customer service–especially when you consider the cable company’s methods, which appear to be deceptive. And the last thing Comcast needs–just ask this 75 year old lady–is another customer service black eye.

Larry DignanLarry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and Editorial Director of ZDNet sister site TechRepublic. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Email Larry Dignan

Subscribe to Between the Lines via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 30 Talkback(s)
Precisely!
AT&T wants to deliver television over their lines (I actually don't know if it is IP or if it shares bandwidth with DSL), Netflix is apparently unhindered delivering videos to consumers, and these cab... (Read the rest)
Posted by: seanferd Posted on: 10/25/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Comcastic, more like Comcraptic ...  MisterMiester | 10/19/07
I have a friend in Pa. that calls them "Communistcast".  James T. Kirk | 10/19/07
Well then, you should see the new  GuidingLight | 10/19/07
Might be illegal depending on where you live.  Letophoro | 10/19/07
How do you save bandwidth by swapping files online? wink  Zeppo9191 | 10/19/07
Misunderstanding the technology ...  George Mitchell | 10/19/07
Thanks for editing  Larry DignanZDNet Moderator | 10/19/07
You're fairly safe...  Cardinal_Bill | 10/19/07
Excuses  Hari Seldon | 10/19/07
It's a form of...  Cardinal_Bill | 10/19/07
No, It is not a form of censorship  GuidingLight | 10/19/07
Uhmmm...  Cardinal_Bill | 10/19/07
I do view that differently, I suppose  GuidingLight | 10/19/07
Here we agree...  Cardinal_Bill | 10/19/07
No, its excersing the right of OWNERSHIP.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/21/07
Why is it abusive to use 100% of your allocated bandwidth?  t_mohajir | 10/19/07
100% bandwidth  seanferd | 10/25/07
Sucks for thieves  n00bnation | 10/19/07
You might not realize....  crash89 | 10/19/07
You definitely have the right nick.  James T. Kirk | 10/19/07
the point is, we ARE paying for it...and it doesn't always mean stealing  vince@... | 10/19/07
Almost ALL major ISPs are snuffing file sharing ...  George Mitchell | 10/19/07
Ohh...  Cardinal_Bill | 10/19/07
I find it ironic ...  George Mitchell | 10/19/07
Precisely!  seanferd | 10/25/07
what a lousy lede  vince@... | 10/19/07
Free the market  Omch'Ar | 10/19/07
Access=Dollars  Grover 22 | 10/20/07
Illegal?  Cardinal_Bill | 10/20/07
RE: Comcast's network controls: File sharing isn't Comcastic  RuralWisp | 10/22/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here