On Metacritic: Give us your Oscar picks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

April 17th, 2008

Red Hat delivers its state of desktop Linux address: There's no money in targeting consumers

Posted by Larry Dignan @ 6:25 am

Categories: General, Linux, Open Source, Red Hat

Tags: Linux Desktop, Red Hat Inc., Desktop Linux, Linux, Desktops, Open Source, Operating Systems, Software, Hardware, Larry Dignan

Red Hat outlined a good chunk of its desktop Linux plans in a blog post, but noted that it has no intention of delivering a traditional consumer product.

In a blog post, Red Hat delivered what could be called a state of its desktop Linux plans and outlined its goals for 2008 and 2009. It plans to dish out its client technology to the Linux community, generate revenue through its products and use desktop software to compliment its middleware and server lineup.

What’s missing? A traditional desktop product for consumers. That’s not too surprising since it’s unclear whether there’s money in it–consumers are unlikely to pay support–and it makes more sense to allow others like Ubuntu (all resources) take the lead on desktop applications for the masses. If Ubuntu got traction, Red Hat could always acquire the company.

Also see: My kid hates Linux

But it really comes down to money. Red Hat’s desktop team writes:

As a public, for-profit company, Red Hat must create products and technologies with an eye on the bottom line, and with desktops this is much harder to do than with servers. The desktop market suffers from having one dominant vendor, and some people still perceive that today’s Linux desktops simply don’t provide a practical alternative. Of course, a growing number of technically savvy users and companies have discovered that today’s Linux desktop is indeed a practical alternative. Nevertheless, building a sustainable business around the Linux desktop is tough, and history is littered with example efforts that have either failed outright, are stalled or are run as charities. But there’s good news too. Technical developments that have become available over the past year or two are accelerating the spread of the Linux Desktop.

Red Hat makes a perfectly valid point: As a public company, it’s almost impossible to take a detour to target consumers on the desktop. Instead, Red Hat is focusing on its bread and butter: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop, Fedora and Red Hat Global Desktop, which targets emerging markets. Red Hat also noted that its Global Desktop rollout has been delayed for almost a year as the company wrestles with business issues.

The takeaway: Desktop Linux is a tough business.

Larry DignanLarry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and Smart Planet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet sister site TechRepublic. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Follow Larry on Twitter.

Email Larry Dignan

Subscribe to Between the Lines via Email alerts or RSS.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 153 Talkback(s)
here should have been hear.
NT (Read the rest)
Posted by: mrlinux Posted on: 04/23/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Because of the subtle differences...  bjbrock | 04/17/08
True, Ubuntu is a force to be reckoned with. And, Ubuntu Server is  DonnieBoy | 04/17/08
Give me SuSE. I'm stuck...  bjbrock | 04/17/08
...  Linux User 147560 | 04/17/08
SuSE has always been the best!  joethemacfan | 04/17/08
I agree, Ubuntu is a joke, I found Suse better  markbn | 04/17/08
Just curious since I haven't tried SUSE  storm14k | 04/17/08
And, that is the beauty of Linux. There are different distributions for  DonnieBoy | 04/17/08
Your statement is a much bigger joke  yschoo1@... | 04/17/08
Suse 10.2 vs K/Ubuntu Feisty  markbn | 04/17/08
No Different than Windows Desktop/Server...  mrlinux | 04/23/08
RE: Red Hat delivers its state of desktop Linux address: There's no money in targeting consumers  Loverock Davidson | 04/17/08
You know its not 1999 anymore...  Stuka | 04/17/08
I'm aware of that but linux isn't!  Loverock Davidson | 04/17/08
...  Linux User 147560 | 04/17/08
Nope  Loverock Davidson | 04/17/08
yep...  bmerc | 04/18/08
We no when you are lying Loverock Davidson ....  mrlinux | 04/23/08
here should have been hear.  mrlinux | 04/23/08
Just curious  Michael Kelly | 04/17/08
Killed the cat  Loverock Davidson | 04/17/08
Come on, Loverock!  GuyAlanDye | 04/17/08
How much more proof do you need?  Loverock Davidson | 04/17/08
I'm also trying to work out...  odubtaig | 04/17/08
pffffffff  tripolitan | 04/17/08
That is laughable!  Loverock Davidson | 04/17/08
...  Linux User 147560 | 04/17/08
...  Linux User 147560 | 04/17/08
Don't worry about the flames  Michael Kelly | 04/17/08
Always listen to the guy from the 90's...  handydan918@... | 04/17/08
Don't bother  jorjitop | 04/17/08
Tried all the "major distros"...  yschoo1@... | 04/17/08
That's not difficult at all  markbn | 04/17/08
balance of terror  catseverywhere@... | 04/18/08
Non Unix Users Expect Linux to be XP  cpushrink1@... | 04/18/08
Don't feed the Troll - please..  fireman949 | 04/17/08
But it's more clicks for the author  Ole Man | 04/17/08
Is that how this thing works?  fireman949 | 04/18/08
Some of the ZDNet authors have confirmed  Ole Man | 04/18/08
Are you suggesting Larry Dignan is LoverRock  softwareFlunky | 04/18/08
Is Larry Dignan the one and only ZDNet author?  Ole Man | 04/19/08
You're right about those individuals..  yschoo1@... | 04/17/08
Another one who refuses to see the truth  Loverock Davidson | 04/17/08
What Relevant Points Have you Pointed out?  cpushrink1@... | 04/18/08
Loverock, don't tell me you were the class clown...  hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 04/19/08
Huh  Liveware Problem | 04/18/08
most likely your technically elite... surely  pcguy777 | 04/18/08
Hmmm...  zkiwi | 04/17/08
What do you mean?  Loverock Davidson | 04/17/08
What do you mean?  ArnoldZiffle | 04/17/08
That's just it  yschoo1@... | 04/17/08
Re: what are Trolls, really?  hkommedal | 04/20/08
So basically  Loverock Davidson | 04/17/08
Your Obvisouly inexperienced.  cpushrink1@... | 04/18/08
i tried to install the ubuntu cd i just ordered in the mail... FAILURE  pcguy777 | 04/18/08
First off, if the failed install of Linux wiped your Windows  cpushrink1@... | 04/18/08
First Do your Research  starcannon99022@... | 04/21/08
LOL!  none none | 04/17/08
Anytime  Loverock Davidson | 04/17/08
Re: Anytime  none none | 04/17/08
Salt  AndyCee | 04/18/08
Here's a question I've been meaning to ask?  odubtaig | 04/17/08
This is a technology blog.  peter_erskine@... | 04/17/08
Linux is for the technically elite. case closed  pcguy777 | 04/18/08
The Good, The Bad, The Ugly  starcannon99022@... | 04/21/08
And the case begins to crumble...  storm14k | 04/21/08
Where did you get that from?  IMHOYAAAH | 04/17/08
I have no idea  alaniane@... | 04/17/08
I forgot to look at the author of the  alaniane@... | 04/17/08
Forgive me, everyone ... I forget, is LD serious ...  daboochmeister | 04/18/08
And Your Point Would Be?  greybeardtechie | 04/18/08
Red Hat focuses on it's corporate business clients  JonathonDoe | 04/17/08
Maybe later they'll support a RH Enterprise Workstation desktop  Spats30 | 04/17/08
This is the most.....  yschoo1@... | 04/17/08
It does make sense to go after the low hanging fruit first.  DonnieBoy | 04/17/08
RedHat handicapped by their history  Chad_z | 04/17/08
RE: Red Hat delivers its state of desktop Linux address: There's no money i  mattflaschen | 04/17/08
One way MS got where it is today...  bjbrock | 04/17/08
backwards  Stuka | 04/17/08
then & now  viztor | 04/18/08
Hmmm, selling service contracts  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/17/08
Pretty much right  Stuka | 04/17/08
Re: Pretty much right  none none | 04/17/08
Right  Stuka | 04/17/08
You're absolutely correct  yschoo1@... | 04/17/08
Distro's and Key Players The Actual Point  cpushrink1@... | 04/18/08
Only one small bone to pick  Ole Man | 04/19/08
The mainstream distros do need to consolidate  Michael Kelly | 04/17/08
Re: Hmmm, selling service contracts  none none | 04/17/08
I've yet to see the operating system  Michael Kelly | 04/17/08
Mhhh...not really...  storm14k | 04/17/08
It's the liability  michael.r.felkins@... | 04/17/08
Not always.  odubtaig | 04/17/08
I've got a better question.  odubtaig | 04/17/08
Bread and butter?  techboy_z | 04/17/08
Re: Consumer Desktop.  Arm A. Geddon | 04/17/08
Well Duuuuh!  Ole Man | 04/17/08
At least the third point is wrong  markbn | 04/17/08
Incomplete, not wrong  Ole Man | 04/17/08
Its still true  storm14k | 04/17/08
Sorry I can't agree with you..  yschoo1@... | 04/17/08
Answer for the 3 people above: statement was wrong  markbn | 04/17/08
That was some great hogwash  Ole Man | 04/18/08
If thinking that makes you happy  markbn | 04/18/08
Well, thank you, oh Great One!  Ole Man | 04/18/08
shocked  markbn | 04/18/08
Yes you may!  Ole Man | 04/19/08
Sorry, Marky, I should have classified  Ole Man | 04/19/08
I did not post any "personal" attack  markbn | 04/19/08
BTW, definition of "wrong"  markbn | 04/19/08
Thank you again, oh wise one (Marky)  Ole Man | 04/20/08
You are welcome Ollie  markbn | 04/20/08
redhat have no desktop product, this is just bleating  stevey_d | 04/17/08
"... with an eye on the bottom line ..."  Anton Philidor | 04/17/08
Desktop Linux is Dead  jpr75_z | 04/17/08
Long live BeOS!!  Arm A. Geddon | 04/17/08
It may well do, as Haiku. (NT)  odubtaig | 04/17/08
RE: Desktop Linux is Dead  gigabot71 | 04/17/08
Would you care to try Ubuntu 8.04 beta, honey and..  yschoo1@... | 04/17/08
hehehe, would love to  rtk | 04/18/08
You may want to take another look  starcannon99022@... | 04/21/08
RE: Red Hat delivers its state of desktop Linux address: There's no money in targeting consumers  john.gruber@... | 04/17/08
RE: Red Hat delivers its state of desktop Linux address: There's no money i  Exile_z | 04/17/08
Right on in every accounts...  yschoo1@... | 04/17/08
Red Hat needs to take a page from others, change the paradigm.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/17/08
Cannot Compete!  Windows Defender | 04/17/08
Go to Dell.com and  yschoo1@... | 04/17/08
Try Xandros; Too bad BeOS  maxtheitpro | 04/17/08
Here in-lies the problem with Linux  ItsTheBottomLine | 04/18/08
If they were competing...  storm14k | 04/17/08
I use what works  starcannon99022@... | 04/21/08
RE: Red Hat delivers its state of desktop Linux address: There's no money i  deus4679 | 04/17/08
RE: I thought Linux was FREE - apparently NOT!  netzd | 04/17/08
Unfortunately Windows Support does not come with the software  cpushrink1@... | 04/18/08
Nice idea except...  storm14k | 04/21/08
RE: Red Hat delivers its state of desktop Linux address: There's no money i  bwchato | 04/17/08
Red Hat has never been a Desktop Linux Company  tracy anne | 04/18/08
Actually they were about 10 years ago  starcannon99022@... | 04/21/08
RE: Red Hat delivers its state of desktop Linux address: There's no money i  jack-daniels@... | 04/18/08
no support is free. I think Windows support costs far more than Linux  stevey_d | 04/18/08
Man that stinks, but I'm glad your not my ..  ItsTheBottomLine | 04/18/08
Even if he was...  storm14k | 04/21/08
you must be .00001 percent of all users  pcguy777 | 04/18/08
Would be funny if...  storm14k | 04/21/08
I agree  starcannon99022@... | 04/21/08
The truth is, Fedora cant compete with Ubuntu & Linux Mint on the desktop  xunil skcor | 04/18/08
Truth is of little importance  Ole Man | 04/20/08
Starting to see codec licenses  starcannon99022@... | 04/21/08
I'm holding out for Linux Magumba  BALTHOR | 04/18/08
Red Hat has to make money...  gmureddu@... | 04/19/08
Endusers are not OS installers  starcannon99022@... | 04/21/08
I Don't Get It..  escapepod | 04/21/08
It was a quickie, very short-lived  Ole Man | 04/21/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here