On CBS MoneyWatch: 20 Things to Know About College Freshmen
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

April 23rd, 2008

Ballmer: We don't need Yahoo and we aren't raising our bid

Posted by Larry Dignan @ 6:04 am

Categories: General, Microsoft, Search, Web Technology, Yahoo

Tags: Steve Ballmer, Yahoo! Inc., Microsoft Corp., Portals, Mergers & Acquisitions, Web Technology, Internet, Investment, Finance, Larry Dignan

In Focus » See more posts on: Microsoft-Yahoo

As expected, Microsoft launched its Yahoo counterattack on Wednesday as CEO Steve Ballmer said the company isn’t raising its bid for the portal and would be just fine without a merger.

Whether Ballmer is bluffing or not remains to be seen. Yahoo reported solid first quarter earnings on Tuesday, but didn’t deliver results good enough to force Microsoft to raise its bid. As things stand today, Microsoft is sticking with its $31 a share offer for Yahoo as a Saturday proxy war deadline approaches.

According to Bloomberg, Ballmer said the following at a Microsoft conference in Milan.

“We are offering a lot of money. If Yahoo’s shareholders like it, that’s great. We are prepared to go forward without a merger with Yahoo.”

As for Ballmer’s Saturday proxy war deadline, the CEO added “time is money, we’ve made that clear.”

What should we make of all of this banter? Bluster aside it’s not inconceivable that Microsoft could raise its bid if it could seal the deal. Time is money for Microsoft too, which is increasingly getting lapped by Google on search and online advertising.

However, analysts widely agreed that Yahoo’s results weren’t enough to prod Microsoft to up its bid. Needham analyst Mark May summed up the consensus Wall Street view:

“We believe these results do little to accelerate a resolution to the stalemate with Microsoft. With no change in the original terms, Microsoft’s offer values Yahoo! at ~$30.80/share, or ~8% above current levels. We believe Yahoo!’s board will continue to vigorously oppose a transaction and pursue other alternatives aggressively, and it appears Microsoft is taking a firm stance on valuation.”

Merrill Lynch analyst Justin Post noted that Yahoo’s search monetization growth of 10 percent missed his 20 percent estimate. On the bright side, Yahoo’s traffic is stable indicating that the company could monetize it better via an outsourcing deal with Google. Post reckons that a Microsoft purchase of Yahoo is the most likely outcome and that the portal has some leverage to negotiate a higher price.

But for now the stand off continues.

Larry DignanLarry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and Smart Planet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet sister site TechRepublic. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Follow Larry on Twitter.

Email Larry Dignan

Subscribe to Between the Lines via Email alerts or RSS.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 31 Talkback(s)
Why should Microsoft need Yahoo?
When they have the resources to build another portal (along with anything else Yahoo has/is) bigger and better than Yahoo?

Reason number one: They don't have the expertise. They are better at b... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Ole Man Posted on: 04/24/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
If you Microasoft doesn't need Yahoo go home!  Randalllind | 04/23/08
Not a stupid statement at all  GuidingLight | 04/23/08
My Dad's bigger than your Dad  fr0thy2 | 04/23/08
Oh well  GuidingLight | 04/23/08
Gonna walk, pulling chair from table (oh, durn it the chair cliche)  DannyO_0x98 | 04/23/08
Then the obvious question is...  zkiwi | 04/23/08
Because of the first part  GuidingLight | 04/23/08
Well...  zkiwi | 04/23/08
Good point  John Zern | 04/23/08
Obviously you haven't tried haggling with a merchant before...  transposeIT | 04/24/08
They were just being generous?  Ole Man | 04/23/08
RE: Ballmer: We don't need Yahoo and we aren't raising our bid  Loverock Davidson | 04/23/08
It is a terrible deal  notlehs | 04/23/08
No its not  Loverock Davidson | 04/23/08
"the creativity that Yahoo can offer"  fr0thy2 | 04/23/08
Two Words -  SpikeyMike | 04/23/08
You're forgetting...  zkiwi | 04/23/08
you never gain anything from ms  Quebec-french | 04/23/08
Message has been deleted.  fr0thy2 | 04/23/08
Message has been deleted.  fr0thy2 | 04/23/08
Glad to hear it  John L. Ries | 04/23/08
Message has been deleted.  itanalyst2@... | 04/23/08
It is possible...  John L. Ries | 04/23/08
MS needs to just replace the board  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/23/08
Why would they bother?  zkiwi | 04/23/08
They don't need it bad enough to raise the bid.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/23/08
That's not what Ballmer said (nt)  zkiwi | 04/23/08
Yahoo!'s Days Are Numbered....  PottHead | 04/23/08
So, if they don't and didn't need Yahoo...  zkiwi | 04/23/08
Why should Microsoft need Yahoo?  Ole Man | 04/24/08
Sounds like a dog chasing his own tail  Ole Man | 04/23/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here