On Metacritic: BioShock 2: Is it a disappointment?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 28th, 2008

Handicapping Windows 7's effect on Vista upgrades

Posted by Larry Dignan @ 7:57 am

Categories: General, IT Management, Microsoft, Software Infrastructure

Tags: Microsoft Windows 7, Microsoft Windows Vista, Kernel, Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Windows Vista (Longhorn), Operating Systems, Software, Larry Dignan

There is an off chance that the recent disclosures about Windows 7 could give folks a little more comfort in their decision to upgrade to Vista once you wade through the various crosscurrents coming from Microsoft.

Based on various nuggets emanating from the D6 conference, various leaks and interviews we know the following about Windows 7 (Techmeme, all ZDNet Windows 7 content, News.com’s D6 coverage).

  • It’s not a huge upgrade;
  • Windows 7 will be based on the Vista driver model;
  • The kernel is Windows Server based;
  • And Windows 7 is due in late 2009.

Aside from that last one, which could make you at least ponder waiting for a 2010 upgrade, there’s little to prevent you from upgrading to Vista. That point is critical because as Dwight Silverman notes one of the big Windows 7 side effects is pondering your upgrade plans to Vista.

Why? If you wait for Windows 7 you’re still going to make the leap you would make today in regards to hardware investment. With Microsoft’s contention that the drivers will be the same you don’t have to worry about the breakage that came with Vista.

Windows chief Steven Sinofsky told News.com:

Windows Vista was about improving those things. We are going to build on the success and the strength of the Windows Server 2008 kernel, and that has all of this work that you’ve been talking about. The key there is that the kernel in Windows Server 08 is an evolution of the kernel in Windows Vista, and then Windows 7 will be a further evolution of that kernel as well.

As long as we’re talking evolution and not revolution customers will be a little more relaxed about moving to Vista. Sure, you could wait for multi-touch capability, but companies aren’t going to give a hoot about that feature.

From everything Microsoft has said Windows 7 will be an easier upgrade–from Vista. It’s not clear about the path from XP to Windows 7 should you wait.

Meanwhile, Vista will be the base of Windows 7, a fact that indicates that your OS investment won’t disappear in two years. Each individual situation will be different as will the arithmetic behind a move to Vista, but Microsoft is certainly doing its best to allay worries for those Windows fence sitters.

Larry DignanLarry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and Smart Planet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet sister site TechRepublic. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Follow Larry on Twitter.

Email Larry Dignan

Subscribe to Between the Lines via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 42 Talkback(s)
64-Bit OS vs. 32-Bit OS
That's a valid question. Although a Vista x64 user myself, however, I wouldn't even think of going back to a 32bit system. I agree that there are some applications that do not run properly with Vist... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Ross Snowden Posted on: 06/19/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Not a good enough reason  ccrashh2@... | 05/28/08
If your plan for Vista was to wait a year (or until SP1)  Michael Kelly | 05/28/08
Even assuming perfect driver migration.  TripleII | 05/28/08
It's really not that difficult  DonBurnett | 05/29/08
Awaiting the big bang.  johnfenjackson@... | 05/28/08
Packaging  johnfenjackson@... | 05/28/08
Remove eye candy  dvm | 05/28/08
a lot more than just eye candy  DonBurnett | 05/29/08
Nothing is ever good enough  Narg | 05/28/08
Windows 7 = Vista Final  Zoli Erdos | 05/28/08
RE: Handicapping Windows 7's effect on Vista upgrades  mypl8s4u2 | 05/28/08
Nonsense  Thack | 05/29/08
I agree  timiteh | 05/30/08
Take XP and add two...  bjbrock | 06/04/08
rehashed  atari8bit@... | 06/05/08
RE: Handicapping Windows 7's effect on Vista upgrades  ralphdb@... | 05/28/08
RE: Handicapping Windows 7's effect on Vista upgrades  james@... | 05/29/08
RE: Handicapping Windows 7's effect on Vista upgrades  michaels.perry@... | 05/29/08
RE: Handicapping Windows 7's effect on Vista upgrades  PC Programmer | 05/29/08
RE: Handicapping Windows 7's effect on Vista upgrades  beatlez969 | 05/29/08
Vista or Office?  frip | 05/29/08
That didn't make much sense  JohnMcGrew@... | 05/29/08
RE: Handicapping Windows 7's effect on Vista upgrades  golfnutzgg@... | 05/29/08
RE: Handicapping Windows 7's effect on Vista upgrades  apaul43 | 05/29/08
which drivers does it break  DonBurnett | 05/29/08
64-Bit OS vs. 32-Bit OS  ted@... | 05/29/08
not true prove this..  DonBurnett | 05/29/08
I was going to say...  JCitizen | 05/31/08
Not Supported By Vista  cpt_slog@... | 06/18/08
64-Bit OS vs. 32-Bit OS  Ross Snowden | 06/19/08
Reading these comments have me baffled  DonBurnett | 05/29/08
SORRY but we have TESTED from the first release......  carlsf@... | 06/04/08
Office 2007 compatibility  beoz | 06/04/08
RE: Handicapping Windows 7's effect on Vista upgrades  safabert | 05/29/08
Not very different = not much better  Andy Goss | 05/30/08
Handicapping USERS want the XP PRO navigation and interface....  carlsf@... | 06/04/08
There are a lot of users that like XP...  bjbrock | 06/04/08
Vista Training???  Boykin01 | 06/05/08
Productivity.  cynic8 | 06/05/08
Wait for Windows 7 SP2  wynnb | 06/05/08
RE: Handicapping Windows 7's effect on Vista upgrades  atari8bit@... | 06/05/08
RE: Handicapping Windows 7's effect on Vista upgrades  ceh4702 | 06/06/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads