On TechRepublic: 10 biggest failures in IT history
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

July 1st, 2008

Microsoft's search plan: It's about semantics and possibly for naught

Posted by Larry Dignan @ 2:23 pm

Categories: General, Google, Microsoft, Search, Semantic Web, Web Technology, Yahoo

Tags: Google Inc., Natural Language, Microsoft Corp., Powerset, Larry Dignan

Microsoft’s search plan apparently revolves around semantics. The software giant picked up Powerset, a natural language search provider for an undisclosed sum.

Will it be enough to close its yawning Google (and even Yahoo) search gap? Probably not, but Powerset could give Microsoft a little leapfrog ability (Techmeme). And boy could Microsoft use some leapfrog love in search.

Rumors about Powerset’s exit strategy have been percolating for weeks and given Microsoft’s standing in search the deal seems like a no-brainer. Whatever Microsoft paid it doesn’t even register as a rounding error in the P&L.

According to Microsoft’s Satya Nadella, senior vice president of search, portal and advertising, Powerset’s team remains in tact and will add to the natural language technologies Microsoft Research has been cooking up.

In many respects, the acquisition is a talent grab and Powerset is happy to oblige. Nadella writes:

We’re buying Powerset first and foremost because we’re impressed with the people there. Powerset CTO and cofounder Barney Pell is a visionary and incredible evangelist. When he introduced our senior engineers to some of the most senior people at Powerset — Search engineers and computational linguists like Tim Converse, Chad Walters, Scott Prevost, Lorenzo Thione, and Ron Kaplan — we came away impressed by their smarts, their experience, their passion for search, and a shared vision.

Makes sense. It sure beats plastering “we’re hiring search folks” ads all over the Web.

Also see: Powerset’s search: Does it deliver?

Taking Powerset for a spin

Microsoft’s big point is that search needs to evolve so queries get answered on the first click. For that to happen you need some natural language love. Nadella says “these problems exist because search engines today primarily match words in a search to words on a webpage. We can solve these problems by working to understand the intent behind each search and the concepts and meaning embedded in a webpage.”

Sound familiar? You bet. That’s the same “intent” spiel that Google and Yahoo use every quarter, every presentation and every press conference about search.

Simply put, Microsoft gets some talent to throw at closing its search gap. And there’s something to be said for that. However, Microsoft can reinvent search, but it’s still running up a natural Google monopoly. The analogy here is Windows: Microsoft didn’t have the best operating system on the planet. It just had the best positioned one. In search, the tables are turned in Google’s favor. I don’t see how Powerset will change that equation.

Larry DignanLarry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and Editorial Director of ZDNet sister site TechRepublic. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Email Larry Dignan

Subscribe to Between the Lines via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 33 Talkback(s)
Exactly, Cobra - MSFT HAS the Technology Already!
I've said it repeatedly - xBox + xBox Online & Store + Windows Media DVR + SilverLight = all-in-one Internet/Cloud Computing/Gaming/Home Entertainment Center that both Google and Apple c... (Read the rest)
Posted by: drprod@... Posted on: 08/13/08  (Edited: 08/13/08 @ 02:59) You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Still, it is VERY easy to change your search provider, or even try the  DonnieBoy | 07/01/08
Wow! I'm agreeing with you for the second time!  P. Douglas | 07/01/08
There's a glass ceiling called mankind  fr0thy2 | 07/02/08
Hate makes fools of us all.  deowll | 07/02/08
You know fr0thy2.....  xuniL_z | 07/02/08
Other than you being overly obvious here, I totally disagree  xuniL_z | 07/02/08
"The cost of Windows on a preloaded machine is not enough to worry about"  fr0thy2 | 07/02/08
MS costs money and **ix is  High Plains | 07/02/08
You are inaccurate on both counts......  xuniL_z | 07/02/08
Tire Patches  JohnMinn | 07/03/08
RE: Huh?!?!  Mr_Wizard | 07/02/08
I guess you could use some semantic search  fr0thy2 | 07/02/08
On the other hand....  xuniL_z | 07/02/08
"What gap? The MS search gives me everything Google's does!"  bmerc | 07/02/08
I take it you advertise  myztry | 07/03/08
RE: Microsoft's search plan: It's about semantics and possibly for naught  yegor.kuznetsov@... | 07/02/08
RE: Microsoft's search plan: It's about semantics and possibly for naught  sy97jgu | 07/02/08
Autonomy rules, even by Gartner "forgot the headline"  sy97jgu | 07/02/08
Nothing could make me use a Microsoft search engine.  scoobyJ | 07/02/08
RE: Microsoft's search plan: It's about semantics and possibly for naught  puppadave | 07/02/08
Microsoft's facination with...  bjbrock | 07/02/08
Sort of agree  deowll | 07/02/08
Natural Language, yes, but for EMAIL, not for Search!!!  DaveMorris | 07/02/08
I missed the problem with outlook.  deowll | 07/02/08
Why not both...?  InnocentBystander | 07/03/08
PowerSet is hype  LBiege | 07/02/08
Microsoft & Semantics?  cosmicfoole@... | 07/02/08
Microsoft doesn't need a search engine.  CobraA1 | 07/02/08
Exactly, Cobra - MSFT HAS the Technology Already!  drprod@... | 08/13/08
MS or not, a semantic search engine will wipe out the others  hgeorgescu@... | 07/03/08
And just exactly who needs it?  TtfnJohn | 07/03/08
Larry -- paging Larry...  TtfnJohn | 07/03/08
RE: Microsoft's search plan: It's about semantics and possibly for naught  jamalystic | 07/07/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here