Between the Lines


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: MSN’s new home page; Nice, but it won’t lure new users
Next Post: EU showdown over Oracle-Sun; Objections seem imminent

New York AG files antitrust charges against Intel; alleges bribery, coercion

Posted in:

The New York Attorney General's office today accused chip maker Intel of engaging in "a worldwide, systematic campaign of illegal conduct," including paying kickbacks and threatening computer makers, and filed federal antitrust charges against it. (PDF of Complaint) In a statement, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo said that e-mails revealed that Intel has scored  exclusive agreements with computer makers to use its microprocessors by resorting to "rebates" and threats, such as cutting off payments, funding a competitor or ending joint development ventures. In a press release, Cuomo said:
Rather than compete fairly, Intel used bribery and coercion to maintain a stranglehold on the market. Intel’s actions not only unfairly restricted potential competitors, but also hurt average consumers who were robbed of better products and lower prices. These illegal tactics must stop and competition must be restored to this vital marketplace.
Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy told the Wall Street Journal that the company will defend itself against the charges and that "Neither consumers who have consistently benefited from lower prices and increased innovation, nor Justice, are being served by the decision to file a case now." Cuomo's office said the company also tried to erase traces of its practices by "eliminating crucial but flagrantly objectionable provisions from written agreements or by camouflaging language about illegal guaranteed market shares with terms like 'volume targets.' " The AG's office noted specific instances of the illegal practices involving Intel and Dell, HP and IBM. Among the allegations: The AG's office also offered examples of instances where PC makers agreed to go along with Intel's practices, specifically a 2006 deal between HP and Intel that involved payment of $925 million to HP to increase Intel's shares of HP's sales at AMD's expense and a collaboration between Intel and Dell to market microprocessors and servers at prices below cost to "deprive AMD of strategically important competitive successes." However, the AG positions the PC makers as victims here, not collaborators. For example, the AG's office offers these examples, unveiled as part of its 20-month investigation:

posted by Sam Diaz
November 4, 2009 @ 9:11 am

Previous Post: MSN’s new home page; Nice, but it won’t lure new users
Next Post: EU showdown over Oracle-Sun; Objections seem imminent


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.