Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: The Steve Jobs Premium
Next Post: Facebook’s Heiliger on buying servers, data management
Posted in:
With the demand and buzz for social network features, or community offerings, these established CMS/Portal vendors recognize the demand, and see opportunity dollars falling through the cracks. I've started conversations with several of the big players to gauge where they are headed. Of course, the conversations don't end up on this blog (unless they give me permission, or publish first) but it's quite obvious where things are headed.In other words, social networking will become a generic enterprise feature at some point. These CMS players can develop their own community suites (and hire staff that understands the social types), acquire white label networks or just hang back. Of those options door No. 2 sounds like the most logical outcome.
Also see: Podcast: Churchill Club on Web 2.0 in the enterprise
Millennials: Will they really reinvent IT?
However, it's early in this effort and it's unclear how it will play out. For instance, Owyang notes that the CMS vendors may not be able to combine social features with their legacy apps. I'd add another: It's unclear whether workers will actually use enterprise social networking features. Clearly, these CMS meets social networking systems won't be as cool as Facebook and it's highly likely the meld of legacy apps will create a clunky experience. Meanwhile, participation isn't guaranteed. If folks don't use these apps there's no community. Participation has thrown a monkey wrench into many great enterprise software waves--just ask CIOs about all those dormant knowledge management systems installed a few years ago.
posted by Larry Dignan
June 30, 2008 @ 8:27 am
Previous Post: The Steve Jobs Premium
Next Post: Facebook’s Heiliger on buying servers, data management
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.