On TV.com: Which Shows Are About to Get the AXE?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

April 12th, 2007

What if car dealerships said "Seat belts? Oh, those'll cost you extra"?

Posted by David Berlind @ 12:09 pm

Categories: General, Hardware Infrastructure, Personal Technology, Security

Tags:

Without namin' names (I've noticed it on so many systems, it's not worth singling out one company), I'm wondering whether the practice of including a limited subscription to an anti-malware (primarily anti-virus) in new computers is a crappy way to treat customers. On several new systems that I've had a chance to check out, I've noticed copies of one security suite or another (Symantec, McAfee, etc.), all of which depend on regular updates from some central online update server to be effective, but all of which only give you those updates for some limited amount of time like 90 days. After that, you have to subscribe to the update service for some amount of money.  Personally, I think this stinks. I'd rather my system come with no third party protection at all then one that only works for 3 months, after which point, I have to start paying money to keep it working. Imagine for example if your new car came with seat belts that stopped working after three months and you had to insert your credit card into the dashboard to get them working again.

Why does it work this way? Anti-malware companies pay big money to system manufacturers to have their solutions pre-loaded onto systems so that when people buy those systems, they're predisposed to using whatever solution is on that system. I might actually use that solution if it gave me one or two years of protection. But 90 days? Most ISPs now offer free copies of anti-malware software just to keep their own support costs down (and prevent their infrastructures from being a major source of the Internet's woes should some outbreak bring the Internet to its knees).

Security companies who are pre-loading their software in this way need to realize that the ISPs are their competition. They have to incent me to use their software and not to use the thing that comes to me for free. Giving me only 90 days is zero incentive as far as I'm concerned. I'd rather go to the trouble of removing the software from my system (something that invariably leaves artifacts behind but shouldn't) and loading the stuff I get for free than using the pre-loaded crippleware which is ultimately why I'd rather not have to go through that trouble either. Just give me a clean system and if Symantec or McAfee has paid you to put some crippled version of their software in the box, put the installation files (along with a shortcut to them) on the hard drive instead of the installed version with a quick delete option to get rid of it altogether.

David Berlind has been Executive Editor at ZDNet since 1998 and has been a technology journalist since 1991. Although he can't respond to all e-mails, he reads them all. You can reach David at david.berlind AT cnet.com. If you don't want the content of your e-mail to turn up in a blog entry, make sure you say so. To the extent that most e-mail he receives looks to sway his opinion about something, he usually looks to pass those points of view onto ZDNet's audience members for their consideration . For disclosures on David's industry affiliations, click here.
  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 42 Talkback(s)
two solutions -
1) Buy a Mac. The trial software that Apple includes can either
a) be hacked into a full version
b) be removed with one simple drag and drop.

2) Put some open-sourced OS on your computer after backing up or replacing the hard drive.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: nix_hed Posted on: 04/18/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Too bad MS was hit with  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/12/07
In this case  StevoCJ | 04/13/07
M$ doesn't think so. They were able  Update victim | 04/16/07
Software solutions.  Anton Philidor | 04/12/07
False confidence.  Anton Philidor | 04/12/07
Agreed totally Anton...  ju1ce | 04/12/07
Not just the ISPs  jfp | 04/12/07
Pre-Load with NOD32  BitTwiddler | 04/12/07
Ziff Davis Media does something as annoying  xuniL_z | 04/12/07
No. That's not nearly as annoying.  dave.leigh@... | 04/12/07
It could  xuniL_z | 04/14/07
MAILbox.  dave.leigh@... | 04/14/07
For the record: ZDNet Ziff Davis Media  dberlind | 04/13/07
What's the history on that?  slopoke | 04/13/07
i knew it was part of cnet networks  xuniL_z | 04/14/07
Actually I remember when seatbelts were extra.  Michael L Hereid Sr | 04/12/07
They still charge but it is a hidden charge now  katrillionaire@... | 04/15/07
One Word: OnStar  ye | 04/12/07
Bad analogy  Master Dingo | 04/12/07
good points  code_Warrior | 04/12/07
There is one benefit of time-limited software  sinleeh@... | 04/13/07
It only gives false sense of security  laman | 04/16/07
No defs updating  laman | 04/16/07
Insult to Injury  WhoTheyGonnaFoolNext | 04/13/07
Join the minority  epcraig | 04/14/07
moot point  richvball44 | 04/15/07
moot point  richvball44 | 04/15/07
Not just anti-malware  murphym@... | 04/16/07
Not all are Power Users  duanerstevens@... | 04/16/07
These aren't seat belts...  Resuna | 04/16/07
Malware protection programs are not the main problem  sborsher | 04/16/07
I'd like to buy a new puter without ANY  guiri | 04/16/07
two solutions -  nix_hed | 04/18/07
Me Too, Me Too  SJ5 | 04/16/07
included software  merc2dogs` | 04/16/07
Oddly enough, you can buy a new PC bare  intrepi@... | 04/16/07
Easier said than done  laman | 04/16/07
Agreed, agreed!!  laman | 04/16/07
Seatbelts do cost extra  whoozhe@... | 04/16/07
NO Reloading Crap!  Enorton42@... | 04/16/07
Really Bad analogy...  sjoconnor3 | 04/17/07
terrible analogy !  mixalis | 04/17/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Recent Entries

Top Rated

    advertisement

    Archives

    Favorite Links

    ZDNet Blogs

    White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

    Meet Doc