On TechRepublic: 10 biggest failures in IT history
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 3rd, 2007

Using Google to replace Sharepoint, LimitNone's gShare bridges MS-Office/Google Apps divide

Posted by David Berlind @ 11:33 am

Categories: General, IT Management, Office 2.0, Software Infrastructure, Web technology

Tags: Google Inc., Google Apps, Document, Microsoft Office, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Corp., Spreadsheet, David Berlind

In Focus » See more posts on: Google Office

Over the last couple of weeks, I have spent a lot of my time writing about Google Apps as though it could be a replacement for Microsoft Office. I still believe that for many companies and users, it either is, will be, or can be such a replacement. There are a great many users who only require the most basic of functionality out of their productivity software but who also end up with something like Microsoft Office if for no other reason than compatibility with the other people they interact with. With the events company that Doug Gold and I started last year (Mass Events Labs), a lot of documents get exchanged not just amongst ourselves, but also with organizations external to us and Office is always the common dominator. Documents are Word-based. Spreadsheets are Excel-based. Presentations are PowerPoint-based. But the usage of Microsoft Office is strictly for inter-organizational file interoperation. Not because of any of the special features in Office.

If you're really looking for frictionless, look no further than Google Docs and Google Spreadsheets.

In my day job, I can't remember the last time I used a complicated feature in Microsoft Office. 100 percent of the text documents I now originate are originated in e-mail (for different inboxes, I use Outlook and Thunderbird), Wordpress (ZDNet's blogging infrastructure), Twiki (the internal wiki used by CNET Networks), or one of Mass Events Labs MediaWiki-based wikis. I can't remember the last time I originated a document in Word. But some percentage of the press releases I receive come in Word format. Still, other attachments from vendors are often in PowerPoint. The rest are straight e-mail or PDF. If it wasn't for the few PowerPoint presentations I assemble each year, or the occasional need to create a spreadhseet, my installation of Microsoft Office would be relegated to reading documents and nothing else. At Mass Events Labs where we could end up with as many as five people collaborating on information, I've setup Google Apps to be our collaborative document backbone.

But Google Apps, like many other Web apps, doesn't yet have the offline problem solved (like Zimbra, I think it will, but for now, it doesn't) and for some users and organizations, being able to collaborate on documents and spreadsheets, even when in a disconnected mode, is imperative. Like me in my jobs at CNET and Mass Events Labs, the need for inter-organizational interoperability equates to having Microsoft Office on our systems and it is for this reason that Office ends up being the default offline tool. 

In Microsoft's world, the way you get normally get people to collaborate on Office documents is through a Sharepoint Server. You could do it by passing documents around in e-mail and using the Track Changes feature of Word. But relative to approaches like Sharepoint where one copy of a shared document is centrally stored and checked in or out for changes (and the controls for doing so are integrated into Microsoft Office), things can get out of hand when a document is shared via e-mail. Multiple copies that are completely out of synch with each other end up as attachments in various inboxes and the effort required to resolve the differences can easily wipe out any gains in organizational productivity that were expected from the collaborative context in the first place. On the other hand, when compared to e-mail, Sharepoint isn't exactly a frictionless solution. It's not frictionless to implement, nor is it frictionless to use. Even though it's probably less efficient in the long run, e-mail feels more efficient. It involves fewer moving parts and, from a process perspective, can take less time to open, edit, close, and distribute a document. 

But if you're really looking for frictionless, look no further than Google Docs and Google Spreadsheets. As I've written before, compared to what's there in the mainstream now, Google Docs and Spreadsheets is like pure collaborative oxygen. I need no local software. No specific operating system.  No system administrators. For you to begin collaborating with someone else, all you need is a browser. Google takes care of the rest to the point that when you make a change to a document, that change simply shows up seconds later on anybody else's screen (anybody else who currently has the document open). We could argue about whether the process of checking documents in and checking them out makes more sense in terms of avoiding conflicting changes. But I think that's secondary to the friction that Google has removed from both the end user experience as well as the implementation part. 

So, where am I going with this? Well, suppose you're sold on the frictionless approach to collaboration that Google has taken, but are still in a world where you can't easily ween yourself (and your users) from Microsoft Office. Maybe Office is the key to interorganizational document interoperation. Maybe it's just what you're users want to use because they're used to using it. Maybe it has those special features that you need that aren't available in other productivity offerings (browser-based or not).  Maybe you want to migrate to something lighter weight like Google Apps over the long run but it will be a migration nevertheless. The old and new systems will have to run in parallel and interoperate.

As a result of what I've been writing over the last couple weeks, one company — LimitNone — contacted me with a solution called gShare that bridges the MS-Office/Google Apps divide. If I had to sum it up in two sentences, they would go like this: On the one hand, it's for companies looking to use Microsoft Office as the offline client for Google Apps. On the other hand, it's also for companies that, for a variety of reasons, want to rip out Sharepoint and replace it with a substitute that integrates equally well into Office, but that's powered by Google. Although my next step is to test it out, from the datasheet that LimitNone sent me, gShare has some features that sound very cool:

  • You can highlight any cells or text (contiguous or non-contiguous) in a spreadsheet or document (relatively speaking) and export the cells or text to Google as a new Google spreadsheet or document.
  • When exporting to Google, you can specify collaborators and viewers for the newly created spreadsheet or document. Collaborators and viewers are instantly notified via email.
  • Once the Google spreadsheet(s) or document(s) are updated, users can click a "synchronize button" to synch those changes with the locally stored spreadsheet(s) or document(s) as though they were manually entered inside Excel or Word.
  • gSHARE also stores your spreadsheets and documents online so they can be accessed from any machine connected to the Internet, provided that the appropriate Microsoft Office products are installed. As part of this service, gSHARE provides automatic backups, versioning and the ability to revert to previous versions stored on the Googles servers.

gShare also support programmatic workflow and provides dashboards that help users manage the metadata that results from collaboration (eg: you can see the last time documents were synched, you can roll-back a synch, and cells in spreadsheets that change from one synch to the next get highlighted). To get a copy of this datasheet — appropriately titled Google and Microsoft Living together in harmony — LimitNone is mistakenly requiring potential customers to leave some contact information on its Web site. It's a very 90's-esque tactic that drives me nuts. Perhaps this blog entry will convince them to make the document more freely available.

Not having used gShare yet, I can't vouch for how well it works. But, at the very least, for the George Ou's of the world who can recite all the reasons it makes sense to have a full-bodied office suite (as well as the reasons something like Google Apps makes no sense), gShare appears to allow users to dip a toe in both worlds, have their cake, and eat it too. 

David Berlind has been Executive Editor at ZDNet since 1998 and has been a technology journalist since 1991. Although he can't respond to all e-mails, he reads them all. You can reach David at david.berlind AT cnet.com. If you don't want the content of your e-mail to turn up in a blog entry, make sure you say so. To the extent that most e-mail he receives looks to sway his opinion about something, he usually looks to pass those points of view onto ZDNet's audience members for their consideration . For disclosures on David's industry affiliations, click here.
  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 72 Talkback(s)
SharePoint Alternative HyperOffice
Another Sharepoint Alternative worth considering is HyperOffice. For one, they've been eying the "SharePoint Alternative" arena for lon... (Read the rest)
Posted by: pankajunk Posted on: 06/16/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Society for the improvement of metaphors...  Anton Philidor | 05/03/07
Cake logic  raylinkz@... | 05/09/07
has it too  yu_forum@... | 05/18/07
COO  Anton Philidor | 05/03/07
I agree.  nomorems | 05/03/07
Link now available  Jonathan Sapir | 05/03/07
GShare is fantastic  dave.schafer@... | 05/03/07
gSHARE  spaget | 05/03/07
I call BULLSHAT!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/03/07
Sorry No_Ax, you are alone.  nomorems | 05/03/07
No Ax again yells shrilly into the void...  mosborne | 05/04/07
I'm calling your bullshat and raising you 1.  dberlind | 05/03/07
Wrong button, David.  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/03/07
Yeah, but it's not worth redoing.  dberlind | 05/03/07
'Especially since it's No_Ax. Not worth it (or IT)! (NT)  nomorems | 05/03/07
*Gack*  broper | 05/03/07
That is ALWAYS the answer for NBM folks. Wait till the next version!  nomorems | 05/03/07
Is Schwinn a competitor of GM?  Jonathan Sapir | 05/04/07
No but the title of this post suggests you can replace  xuniL_z | 05/07/07
Is this a comparison, or is it what is starting to seem  xuniL_z | 05/03/07
Sounds like you are a Microsoft sales employee.  nomorems | 05/03/07
Apples vs Oranges  netuzer | 05/04/07
Well, the story is apples and oranges to begin with....  xuniL_z | 05/05/07
Apples to fruitbaskets  pointzerotwo | 05/07/07
Yeah yeah...!  alokgovil | 05/03/07
Check this blog's tagline  dberlind | 05/03/07
"Go with the fashion without using much brains"  nomorems | 05/03/07
What parts of Office do people actually use, then  John Zern | 05/03/07
I'm sorry, where does the text you quote appear?  dberlind | 05/03/07
Don't expect a reply. You called him and MS states 'don't reply if wrong'  nomorems | 05/03/07
I'm changing my name to nomorons  John Zern | 05/04/07
Where did you get the impression I was quoting?  John Zern | 05/04/07
Microsoft will find some way to market this to increase MS Office sales.  nomorems | 05/03/07
Making money its what its about (and a good thing)  mrjonno | 05/04/07
IF all there is to business..  mdsmedia | 05/04/07
But, screwing your customers for the biggest short term gain, will get you  DonnieBoy | 05/04/07
Wait Donnie.  xuniL_z | 05/04/07
So, okay to screw customers if it meets your short term financial needs???  DonnieBoy | 05/04/07
WHAT are you talking about? And what about YouTube  John Zern | 05/04/07
Google won't have any trouble incorporating YouTube, there is no culture  DonnieBoy | 05/04/07
Donnie,  xuniL_z | 05/05/07
Me thinks......  xuniL_z | 05/05/07
Making money is still what its about  mrjonno | 05/04/07
But, Google has nothing to lose here. They don't even have to make money on  DonnieBoy | 05/04/07
You've never been inside either company  John Zern | 05/04/07
I have been to both companies, most recently Google. The difference is  DonnieBoy | 05/04/07
Quit lying DonnieBoy  John Zern | 05/04/07
In all fairness DB, here's why I called your bluff  John Zern | 05/04/07
You know, not every business is a member of the stock market ...  nomorems | 05/04/07
Must be the industry  John Zern | 05/04/07
Oh the irony  xuniL_z | 05/04/07
This is all very interesting, and must have Microsoft terrified.  DonnieBoy | 05/04/07
Do you only read these anti Microsoft articles and not  xuniL_z | 05/04/07
Now, that is funny, Microsoft has google on the ropes with Sharepoint!!  DonnieBoy | 05/04/07
What is REALLY funny  xuniL_z | 05/04/07
Spew all the garbage you want, but the wold is changing. MS has a wealth of  DonnieBoy | 05/04/07
Didn't answer the question  ITguy5678 | 05/04/07
The point is not what one individual might or might not use, the point is  DonnieBoy | 05/04/07
The point?  ITguy5678 | 05/04/07
Well, if it makes you feel better, YES, we do use it, the colaboration is  DonnieBoy | 05/04/07
Ok, so Microsoft has absolutely no  xuniL_z | 05/04/07
Yes, people will still be printing documents for some time to come, but  DonnieBoy | 05/04/07
You reply w/o even reading the post obviously.  xuniL_z | 05/04/07
Long term / short term  ITguy5678 | 05/04/07
Go ahead, write a book, spew all the gargage you want. I  DonnieBoy | 05/04/07
Slight correction...  baporopat@... | 05/04/07
What about Groove?  Leon Tribe | 05/06/07
Stuck in the middle  donkeytroe | 05/07/07
Does the pricetag of 2.5 Million for Google help?  xuniL_z | 05/07/07
Oh wait. That's just for the limited functionality apps, then you have to..  xuniL_z | 05/08/07
Should we really give all our secrets to...  hdn.de | 05/08/07
SharePoint Alternative HyperOffice  pankajunk | 06/16/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Top Rated

    advertisement

    Archives

    Favorite Links

    ZDNet Blogs

    White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

    SmartPlanet

    Click Here