On CHOW: How to avoid dirty looks at cafes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

September 11th, 2007

Microsoft awarded patent for watermarking form of DRM. But can it really work?

Posted by David Berlind @ 6:24 pm

Categories: Entertainment, General, Security, Web technology

Tags: Patent, Digital-rights Management, Microsoft Corp., Technology, Bray, David Berlind

In Focus » See more posts on: DRM

According to InfoWorld:

Microsoft has won a patent for a digital-watermarking technology that could be used to protect the rights of content owners even when digital music is distributed without DRM protection….Forensic digital watermarking technology like the technology Microsoft has patented doesn’t encrypt files the way DRM technology does or prevent people from unauthorized use. However, it can be used to prove who owns the content of the digital file by encoding a file with a unique digital signature. That means illegally traded songs could be tracked back to the original purchaser, allowing authorities to identify illegal sharers and serving as a deterrent.

First, I’m not sure who the spin doctors are that got a hold of this one. But the idea that a watermarking technology of this sort is not DRM (as the story implies) is simply BS. DRM stands for digital rights management and you don’t have to read too far into the story to figure out that the technology in question is every bit as much about managing digital rights as other bit-scrambling DRM technologies are (what I’ve often referred to as C.R.A.P.)

That said, next comes the question of whether such watermarking technologies even work (or, has Microsoft come up with one that works where others have not)? As I said in a blog I posted last year, Sun’s Director of Web Technologies Tim Bray assured me in 2005 that watermarking technologies are easily defeated. Bray’s no slouch when it comes to software engineering — it’s hard not to take his assessment seriously.

David Berlind has been Executive Editor at ZDNet since 1998 and has been a technology journalist since 1991. Although he can't respond to all e-mails, he reads them all. You can reach David at david.berlind AT cnet.com. If you don't want the content of your e-mail to turn up in a blog entry, make sure you say so. To the extent that most e-mail he receives looks to sway his opinion about something, he usually looks to pass those points of view onto ZDNet's audience members for their consideration . For disclosures on David's industry affiliations, click here.
  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 51 Talkback(s)
Personal watermarks probably the best option
The best way to enforce this would be personal watermarks, I think. When you purchase the media, you would have to enter your personal id code the first time you open the file, therefore embedding th... (Read the rest)
Posted by: laura.b Posted on: 09/14/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
watermarking doesn't seem like an incredibly unreasonable compromise...  voyager529 | 09/11/07
watermarking is fine  chrome_slinky@... | 09/12/07
Depends on how it is done  TripleII | 09/12/07
Here's a question  voska | 09/12/07
Depends.  frgough | 09/13/07
Tag, you're it!  Ole Man | 09/12/07
The only people who could possibly object to this  mrjonno | 09/12/07
That's the problem  rapson | 09/12/07
Not True  Ole Man | 09/12/07
Not just lawyers. You left a out a few...  James T. Kirk | 09/12/07
What does licensing have to do with this?  laura.b | 09/14/07
Copyright law disagrees with you  voska | 09/12/07
Sounds like a reasonable compromise to me!  bka1959 | 09/12/07
Every cd/dvd I've ever bought  mrjonno | 09/12/07
You just don't give up...  James T. Kirk | 09/12/07
Copyright doesn't remove ownship  voska | 09/12/07
I can ensure you where I come from  mrjonno | 09/12/07
Well the watermark may sound like a good idea...  mrlinux | 09/12/07
Blank media  James T. Kirk | 09/12/07
Sorry for the confusing post...  mrlinux | 09/12/07
Patenting 101  laura.b | 09/14/07
Easily?  TripleII | 09/12/07
Depends on how easy it is...  mrlinux | 09/12/07
I agree  TripleII | 09/12/07
Watermarking != DRM  TripleII | 09/12/07
Watermarking form of DRM  voska | 09/12/07
Copy protection != copyright protection  jabster17 | 09/12/07
Watermarking is personalized DRM  FileNotFound | 09/14/07
Tracking is not the same as restricting  laura.b | 09/14/07
If I get my Fair Use Right back I'm all for it!  bka1959 | 09/12/07
In other word to keep honest people honest....  mrlinux | 09/12/07
I have movies older than 7 years  voska | 09/12/07
I have audio cassettes from 1981  jabster17 | 09/12/07
I have a VHS from 1984  laura.b | 09/14/07
Chicken or the Egg?  bka1959 | 09/12/07
What degrades in 5-7 years?  laura.b | 09/14/07
What's DRM for?  voska | 09/12/07
Copy Protection!  bka1959 | 09/12/07
What happens  roaming | 09/12/07
What happens? S**T Happens!  FileNotFound | 09/14/07
Flawed  agalli74 | 09/13/07
Err how about the police investigate  mrjonno | 09/13/07
Investigate a stolen iPod?  FileNotFound | 09/14/07
Don't know what its like in the US  mrjonno | 09/14/07
We apparently have more crime than you do. LOL  laura.b | 09/14/07
Dude it's simple, CYA . If it's lost  bka1959 | 09/13/07
Dude it's simple, CYA . If it's lost  bka1959 | 09/13/07
Trying reporting it stolen  laura.b | 09/14/07
RE: Microsoft awarded patent for watermarking form of DRM. But can it really work?  goldenpirate@... | 09/13/07
There is no easy way for them to watermark...  mrlinux | 09/13/07
Personal watermarks probably the best option  laura.b | 09/14/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Top Rated

    advertisement

    Archives

    Favorite Links

    ZDNet Blogs

    White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads