On mySimon: Hunter Wellies Rain Boots For Men
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

September 5th, 2006

Vista Mythbusters #2: Dual-core and 64-bit support

Posted by Ed Bott @ 2:22 pm

Categories: Vista Mythbusters, Windows Vista

Tags:

In Focus » See more posts on: Vista, Vista

This is the second in my series on Vista myths. A pair of questions keep popping up in the Talkback section whenever I write about Windows Vista, so let's deal with them right now.

Myth: Some versions of Windows Vista won't support dual-core CPUs or 64-bit processors.

Reality: Every Vista version supports dual-core processors, and every version is available in a 64-bit native version as well.

Part of the confusion rests with the specifications for some fairly exotic hardware. If you have a PC with multiple physical CPUs - that is, two or more chips installed on the motherboard - you'll need Windows Vista Business, Enterprise, or Ultimate to take advantage of both CPUs. If you install Vista Home Basic or Home Premium, the OS will only recognize one CPU. That's similar to the way Windows XP works today - if have a dual-CPU machine, you need to install XP Professional to use both CPUs.

So what about dual-core CPUs? That's different. All Vista versions, even the lowly Home Basic, support multiple cores on a single chip, with no additional configuration required.

Update 13-November: Don't just take my word for it. Before dual-core chips reached the market, Microsoft publicly declared that its definition of processor encompasses physical CPUs, not individual cores:

On October 19, 2004, Microsoft announced that its server software that is currently licensed on a per-processor model will continue to be licensed on a per-processor, and not on a per-core, model. This policy will allow customers to recognize more performance and power from Microsoft software on a multicore processor system without incurring additional software licensing fees.

 

The story with 64-bit Windows is a little more complicated. Today, Windows XP Professional is available in separate 32-bit and 64-bit versions that are functionally identical but must be purchased separately. In Vista, every version will be available in both 32- and 64-bit versions. A Microsoft spokesperson tells me they're still working out the details, but the current plan is to include 32-bit versions in retail packages; if you want to install a 64-bit version, you'll have to call and request that the alternative media be sent to you. The same spokesperson says Microsoft may include both 32-bit and 64-bit DVD media in the Windows Vista Ultimate box. For $399, that sounds like the right thing to do.

Previously in this series:

Vista Mythbusters #1: It's not a hardware hog

Ed BottEd Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Ed Bott

Subscribe to Ed Bott's Microsoft Report via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 143 Talkback(s)
Sometimes - you are just like Mike Cox
Sometimes you say some decent stuff when you talk technically, though I don't agree with your anti-MS bias. But this post was just pure garbage - and you know it. This was just pure baseless rant. All emotion and no facts.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: DevGuy_z Posted on: 02/25/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
This dual core processor talk always confuses me  kesgardner | 09/05/06
No need to e-mail a screen  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 09/05/06
Well, I looked at the System Summary section...  kesgardner | 09/05/06
Should give you processor specs  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 09/06/06
just take a look  info@... | 09/06/06
I did some further checking  kesgardner | 09/06/06
indeed its hypertreading  galileon | 09/06/06
Galileon, thanks...  kesgardner | 09/06/06
No Dual Processors with Pentium 4  mustang_z | 09/06/06
The mystery may be solved  kesgardner | 09/06/06
And, the biggest Vista myth of all??  DonnieBoy | 09/05/06
The biggest myth of all - Donnieboy  TonyMcS | 09/05/06
Message has been deleted.  DonnieBoy | 09/05/06
Linux Am Be Good, Then?  ZappBrannigan | 09/06/06
VicFung  VicFung | 09/06/06
Tony, slapping DonnieBoy with truth and facts  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/06/06
Hello Pot!!!!  Spoon Jabber | 09/06/06
Yes, but...  mustang_z | 09/06/06
I agree!  mustang_z | 09/06/06
You are a Windows using Dinosour Tony  slim-01 | 09/07/06
Completely unnecessary and pointless. Cut and dried.  Cayble | 09/05/06
Linux is ready for prime time, the problem is applications and hardware  DonnieBoy | 09/05/06
Here we go again  Michael L Hereid Sr | 09/05/06
The reason  pkrdk | 09/06/06
NEW reason  ddagolfr | 09/08/06
Hilarious!!! You crack me up!!!  NonZealot | 09/05/06
So what is Linux's biggest issue?  corticus | 09/06/06
WinNT4 Ready for Prime Time!  ZappBrannigan | 09/06/06
Applications, Hardwae, GUI, EULA, and  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/06/06
Sure are grinding that nonexistant axe these days  Sabz5150 | 09/06/06
He Knows Little About The Workings Of Anything  itanalyst | 09/06/06
You mean there's more???  UncleBubba | 09/06/06
not ready for desktop?  Dave P. | 09/09/06
Pretty amusing  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 09/10/06
Race car is ready for Daytona, the problem is engine, tranny and chassis.  osreinstall | 09/06/06
without the software it is useless.  balsover | 09/06/06
You think Linux isn't "grown up" because it won't play your games??  dave.leigh@... | 09/05/06
A little out of date  pkrdk | 09/06/06
Thunderbird/Open Office = Outlook/MSOffice  technodolt | 09/06/06
Yep. Sure is. And...?  dave.leigh@... | 09/06/06
That other 20%  A.Sinic | 09/06/06
Get real.  dave.leigh@... | 09/06/06
With respect  Linux User 147560 | 09/06/06
While I agree...  gildedlink | 10/11/07
You may have to run a limited use of Windows for about 1 1/2 years  slim-01 | 09/07/06
And the reason Linux is safe ...  mwagner@... | 09/06/06
Linux apps for home users....  brendthess | 09/06/06
Let's go fishing! For RED HERRINGS!  Linux User 147560 | 09/06/06
There is a nice free program called MyMoney that is like Quicken  slim-01 | 09/07/06
Thanks for the info  Linux User 147560 | 09/07/06
Your actually ahead of me  slim-01 | 09/07/06
Never checked out linux huh?  devlin_X | 09/11/06
not necessarily..  gildedlink | 10/11/07
Any Linux fans actually running Vista??  tech.paul@... | 09/06/06
That's not silly.  dave.leigh@... | 09/06/06
Windows users understate Linux because the had a friend of a friend...  slim-01 | 09/07/06
this argument is ridiculous  adthom | 09/18/06
not ridiculous at all..  gildedlink | 10/11/07
all of this is very amusing!  christoph1176@... | 06/08/07
Sometimes - you are just like Mike Cox  DevGuy_z | 02/25/08
Packaging & Marketing...  LazLong | 09/05/06
Isn't that what the segmentation is?  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 09/05/06
Yes, But I think you missed my point.......  LazLong | 09/05/06
And you miss everyone else's point.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/06/06
Yes, You're Joe Average User  itanalyst | 09/06/06
Apparently, the other 95% of users are too...  ajole | 09/07/06
The world will be running Linux shortly just as they are on the Internet  slim-01 | 09/07/06
Adding of course..  gildedlink | 10/11/07
Segmentation  Endoscopy | 09/06/06
Actually, that's not true  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 09/06/06
Nope  pkrdk | 09/06/06
Corporate networking  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 09/06/06
64 vs 32 Bit  brossyg@... | 09/06/06
Depends on your hardware  erniescar99 | 09/06/06
32 vs 64-bit  brossyg@... | 09/06/06
why 64 bit?  diane wilson | 09/06/06
Should be faster  mustang_z | 09/06/06
64 bit OS is a waste of time if hardware and software support not in sync.  wessonjoe | 09/06/06
Not true with all OS's 64 bit Linux is much faster than 32 bit version  slim-01 | 09/07/06
You also need a 64 bit motherboard and capture card.  osreinstall | 09/07/06
what gui did you run on linux?  galileon | 09/06/06
No doubt that dualcore and multiprocessor systems will be supported  Sabz5150 | 09/06/06
above (all)  louisob6 | 09/06/06
How Long Will They Support It?  duclod | 09/06/06
No. They won't!  mwagner@... | 09/06/06
How many cores does Vista support  David_Leon | 09/06/06
hahaha  galileon | 09/06/06
Very good question...anyone with an answer?  ladyirol | 09/06/06
Without a Unix style file system Vista was obsolete before they started  slim-01 | 09/07/06
limits  register@... | 09/06/06
Myth Making  Harry Bardal | 09/06/06
Clap, Clap!  ladyirol | 09/06/06
Vista Mythbusters #0: Vista is not XP sp3 ... happy  michael_t | 09/06/06
I most strongly agree that Microsoft and their market share....  Yodaddy | 09/06/06
Why would they do that?  osreinstall | 09/06/06
Beacuse it would be TOO hard for these soft-brained  michael_t | 09/06/06
I think you have a hard head  osreinstall | 09/07/06
64 bit is NOT only bigger memory  michael_t | 09/08/06
I was referring to address space  osreinstall | 09/08/06
Your nickname is very suited for a MS user  slim-01 | 09/07/06
I reinstall a lot of other people's OSs.  osreinstall | 09/07/06
U need to start messing with other peoples' machines  michael_t | 09/08/06
Ypu need to quit posting mindless MS rants.  osreinstall | 09/08/06
tsk tsk  christoph1176@... | 06/08/07
Well the indiference of MS in 64-bit h/w was matched only  michael_t | 09/06/06
Good thing  HerbieHightower | 09/07/06
Quite right: I am sitting back enjoying my coffee while  michael_t | 09/08/06
That is totally illogical  davids@... | 04/21/07
In the 90's there were no consumer PC's running 64 bit processors  balsover | 09/06/06
There were PLENTY of 64-bit engineering workstations for people who needed  michael_t | 09/08/06
That's a crock.  HypnoToad | 09/09/06
Its hard because they are trying to keep from breaking everything  ajole | 09/07/06
These are really very beautiful thoughts ... happy  michael_t | 09/08/06
Microsoft only sees innovation after everyone else does.  HypnoToad | 09/09/06
I think that's a reasonably fair comment  davids@... | 04/21/07
"Functionally Identical"  YaBaby | 09/06/06
I'm thinking what he intended was....  Yodaddy | 09/06/06
Bad advice.  YaBaby | 09/07/06
Sigh  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 09/06/06
until you try to install a driver  balsover | 09/06/06
No, it doesn't  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 09/06/06
Unless the operation is trying to do updates...  ajole | 09/07/06
Sigh indeed  YaBaby | 09/07/06
It simply means that both can run the same  michael_t | 09/06/06
Win 64 bit vs Linux 64 bit  slim-01 | 09/07/06
huh!!!!  Linux Geek | 09/06/06
No, you don't have to pay  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 09/06/06
You will say anything!  osreinstall | 09/07/06
ZDNet fix your javascript now!  osreinstall | 09/07/06
Uh... this time it wasn't ZDnet's  Linux User 147560 | 09/07/06
No, it was ZDNet.  osreinstall | 09/07/06
This is worse than I thought.  osreinstall | 09/07/06
Hmm  Linux User 147560 | 09/07/06
Interesting...  Linux User 147560 | 09/07/06
64 bit driver support  tester_guy | 09/07/06
This is why Linux users get mad at lazy hardware vendors  slim-01 | 09/07/06
Force people to listen?  ccutright | 07/21/07
Speed is the issue on multiprocessor multicore  mighetto | 09/08/06
Your post is incoherent  davids@... | 04/21/07
DRM?  kcredden | 09/09/06
64 bit Vista and Dual Core Processors  clyman6232@... | 01/26/07
Is it really such a secret?  davids@... | 04/21/07
OS Reinstall  djrkw | 02/04/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement
Click Here

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here