On CHOW: Gifts for everyone
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

October 19th, 2006

Virtual Vista Q and A

Posted by Ed Bott @ 5:49 am

Categories: Licensing, Windows Vista

Tags:

In Focus » See more posts on: Vista

I'm still trying to understand the confusing new licensing terms that affect how and when you can run Windows Vista within a virtual machine. In the interests of clarity, I sent a list of questions to Microsoft and received answers from Microsoft Director Scott Woodgate. I have corrected a few minor typos in both the questions and answers.

These answers contain two surprising pieces of information. One is that Microsoft fully intends that a virtual machine is locked to the hardware on which you first run it. This strikes me as a bizarre restriction on virtual machines, which are encapsulated in files that can be easily moved from one physical machine to another. Indeed, portability is one of the key advantages of VMs. Locking a virtual machine to a single physical device (with the right to move it once and only once) is somewhat like saying that you are not allowed to move your physical PC from the room in which you first installed it.

The second bit of news here is that MSDN subscribers will have the right to run any version of Windows Vista, including Home Basic and Home Premium, in a virtual machine for development purposes. They will also be allowed to make as many copies of those virtual machines as they like, again for development purposes. That certainly makes the $699 MSDN Operating Systems subscription an attractive option for anyone whose work involves development and testing.

Q: If I run Windows Vista Ultimate, and I install virtualization software on my PC, am I allowed to install and activate Windows Vista Ultimate within a virtual machine on that computer with no additional fee?

A: No.  A separate license is required for every installation of Windows Ultimate.  In this case two licenses would be required.

Q: Am I allowed to access a virtual copy of Windows Vista Ultimate via Remote Desktop?

A: Yes. Given a copy of Windows Vista Ultimate installed on my home computer virtually or otherwise, I am able to access my copy remotely as the primary user of the operating system.

Q: If I have a fully paid for copy of Windows Vista Business or Ultimate Edition, can I install and activate it under Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 running on Windows Server 2003?

A: Yes and no.

  • Yes. A retail copy of Windows can be transferred one time to another device.  A retail [copy] can be moved one time to a server running Windows Server 2003 and Microsoft Virtual Server 2005. In this case the originally installed version must be deleted so only one license is activated at one time.
  • No. An OEM copy of Windows is licensed for the device it is installed on.  An OEM copy of Windows cannot be moved from the laptop/desktop that it came on to another device.  This is not new and has been in effect for many years.

Q: If I have a fully paid for copy of Windows Vista Business or Ultimate Edition, can I install and activate it under Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 running on Windows XP?

A: Yes. I’m assuming you have a Windows XP machine and you buy a retail copy of Windows Vista Business or Windows Vista Ultimate and then install it on the XP in a virtual machine.

Q: If I have a fully paid for copy of Windows Vista Business or Ultimate Edition, can I install and activate it under VMware running on any version of Linux?

A: Yes.  I’m assuming you have a Linux machine and you buy a retail copy of Windows Vista Business or Windows Vista Ultimate and then install it on the Linux machine under VMWare.

Q: If I create a virtual machine using Windows Vista Business or Ultimate Edition, can I run that VM on another computer running Windows Vista Ultimate Edition?

This is the same answer as the question above asking about Virtual Server 2005 and Windows Server 2003

  • Yes. The retail copy of Windows can be transferred one time to another computer running any operating system.
  • No. The OEM copy of Windows that comes with new machines can not be moved to another machine. This is not new and has been policy for many years.

Q: Is it legal to make a copy of a virtual machine running any version of Windows Vista?

A: This question is not clear. Only Windows Vista Business, Ultimate and Enterprise are licensed for installation in virtual machines.

Q: If a software developer purchases a retail copy of Windows Vista Home Basic Edition and installs it in a virtual machine so that he can perform compatibility testing with it, is he in violation of the license agreement? AND  Will the license agreements that come with MSDN subscriptions have different terms for use with virtual hardware?

A: Developers with MSDN subscriptions are able to run ALL versions of Windows Vista (including Home Basic and Home Premium) in virtual machines for development purposes. In addition, they are also able to make as many copies of those virtual machines as they wish for development purposes.  Developers generally do not purchase retail software for development purchases.

Ed BottEd Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Ed Bott

Subscribe to Ed Bott's Microsoft Report via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 77 Talkback(s)
Thanks!
Nuff said. (Read the rest)
Posted by: Ole Man Posted on: 10/30/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
They can EULAgize all they want....  bmgoodman | 10/19/06
Also thinking aloud ...  error@... | 10/19/06
One VM case not covered  mosborne | 10/19/06
Eactly my question!  mtgarden | 10/19/06
Just wondering  error@... | 10/19/06
No, its a volume license / corpoarte version  mtgarden | 10/19/06
Technically, that's not legal  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/19/06
Agreed  mosborne | 10/19/06
Let me clarify  mtgarden | 10/19/06
The OEM license on the PC itself is irrelevant  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/19/06
Ok, mtgarden  mosborne | 10/19/06
When you upgrade an OEM license...  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/19/06
I do have an OEM copy of XP  error@... | 10/19/06
It's not validation that's the problem  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/19/06
You are correct  error@... | 10/19/06
Different OEM types  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/19/06
Should be no problem  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/19/06
But it is OEM, not retail  error@... | 10/19/06
Not what I asked  mosborne | 10/19/06
These two questions are not equivalent  error@... | 10/19/06
Disagree  mosborne | 10/19/06
I have to admit  error@... | 10/19/06
I think I finally understand the license  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/19/06
Would MS allow manufacturers to pre-install in VM's?  error@... | 10/19/06
But Edd Why  OldMarine | 10/20/06
I don't get it either  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/21/06
Bad Business Choices  Cardhu | 10/22/06
My apologies, I missed the OEM part  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/19/06
Very bad news  HankH | 10/22/06
From the list above....  bportlock | 10/19/06
I think the idea is to prevent sharing a machine via thin client  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/19/06
License per device, not per person  CarlS | 10/19/06
You've got a point  dave.leigh@... | 10/19/06
Clear to me..  vdeswert | 10/20/06
Message has been deleted.  nightman45 | 10/19/06
MSDN Sounds good  BFD | 10/19/06
Can't do that  aemc | 10/19/06
Actually, the price is not all that bad  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/19/06
I don't think the EULAs will stand in court.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/19/06
Declaring the EULA null and void ...  error@... | 10/19/06
Contract Law  DannyO_0x98 | 10/20/06
forbid MS from enforcing their interpretation?  Ole Man | 10/21/06
Rapidly becoming moot  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/19/06
That's why DMCA is such terrible ...  mwagner@... | 10/20/06
rather than the courts  Ole Man | 10/21/06
It doesn't matter ...  mwagner@... | 10/20/06
The major question STILL was not asked!  BitTwiddler | 10/19/06
Nothing to clarify on Section 15  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/19/06
Not only that, retail copy can be sold only once.  osreinstall | 10/19/06
yes there is  mrati2ud | 10/20/06
I don't know. I am asking.  osreinstall | 10/20/06
What is a new machine?  wolfendbd | 10/21/06
A new machine in my book is when no original part exists anymore.  osreinstall | 10/21/06
See # 52  Ole Man | 10/21/06
Not quite Ole Man  osreinstall | 10/21/06
Even More Troublesome  pietasterkid | 10/24/06
Perfectly Clear In First EULA  Ole Man | 10/21/06
Let me provide an analogy  Richard Flude | 10/19/06
And people think the GPL is confusing!  dave.leigh@... | 10/19/06
Something has seriously gone wrong...  jbrinkman1966 | 10/20/06
It's A Strategy ...  Cardhu | 10/22/06
Windows Vista  bb1040 | 10/20/06
Retail ripoff  Robert Crocker | 10/20/06
Nope  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/20/06
Question, Ed  Ole Man | 10/21/06
No...  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 10/21/06
Re: Retail ripoff  cnfrisch | 10/20/06
Message has been deleted.  Ole Man | 10/21/06
Unfair to CN  TripleII | 10/21/06
I agree with Triplell  Cardhu | 10/23/06
You're Right Of Course, Triplell & Cardhu  Ole Man | 10/24/06
It's Human Nature For Tempers To Flare ...  Cardhu | 10/24/06
Thanks!  Ole Man | 10/30/06
sPillingg chker Malfunction  BALTHOR | 10/20/06
Forgot One  Ole Man | 10/21/06
I Can't Believe ...  Cardhu | 10/22/06
Who cares  whoozhe@... | 10/24/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline