On TV.com: Who's Absent From LOST's Final Season?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

April 5th, 2006

Apple's Boot Camp is just the start

Posted by Ed Bott @ 6:37 am

Categories: Apple, Microsoft

Tags:

Apple has formally introduced a utility called Boot Camp that lets owners of Intel-based Macs run Windows XP:

Boot Camp simplifies Windows installation on an Intel-based Mac by providing a simple graphical step-by-step assistant application to dynamically create a second partition on the hard drive for Windows, to burn a CD with all the necessary Windows drivers, and to install Windows from a Windows XP installation CD. After installation is complete, users can choose to run either Mac OS X or Windows when they restart their computer.

It’s a time-limited beta, but Apple’s press release promises that the feature will be formally available in the upcoming OS X Leopard release.

I’m not a big fan of dual-booting, which represents a crude solution to compatibility problems. If you own a Mac, you bought it because you want to use your Mac applications. It’s an enormous hassle to shut everything down and boot into an alien operating system to perform a task that can’t be accomplished in the native environment. And while you’re running Windows on your Mac, you’ve lost all access to your familiar Mac desktop and programs. I’m also skeptical that drivers written for Windows XP will work seamlessly on this unfamiliar hardware platform. When you add it all up, this is a feature that diehard enthusiasts might experiment with, but it won’t be particularly useful in the real world.

Now, what would really be interesting is if Apple or a third-party software maker could create a virtualization layer that allowed Windows and native Windows programs to run in an alternate process under the Mac OS. If I knew I could install a software layer like VMWare or Virtual PC and toggle instantly between the Windows environment and the Mac OS, with the ability to share data files and a Clipboard, I’d be sorely tempted to buy an Intel-based Mac.

Ironically, Microsoft might not even mind. Every one of those virtual PCs would require a license for its copy of Windows, sending a big ka-ching to Redmond and making it possible for any Mac owner to become part of the Windows family. It’s all part of Bill Gates’ original, 1970s-vintage mission statement for Microsoft: "A computer in every home and on every desktop, running Microsoft software."

Want to take bets on how soon it will happen?

Update 5-Apr-2006: Well, that was fast. According to Walt Mossberg in The Wall Street Journal, a Virginia-based company called Parallels, Inc. will release a beta version of its Windows VM package for Macs later this week. Mossberg says the program will be called Parallels Workstation for OS X and will cost $49, plus the cost of Windows itself.

Ed BottEd Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Ed Bott

Subscribe to Ed Bott's Microsoft Report via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 38 Talkback(s)
Since when
does license have to be a written contract?

Xerox gave Apple engineers three days of access to the PARC
facilities in return for selling them one million dollars in pre-IPO
Apple stock ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Len Rooney Posted on: 04/13/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Probably soon.  Anton Philidor | 04/05/06
WINE  hawkeyeaz1 | 04/05/06
DarWINE  sauron202 | 04/06/06
Xen / Put a fork in it  D. T. Schmitz | 04/05/06
The Big Shift  Harry Bardal | 04/05/06
Translation, please?  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 04/05/06
The Big Shift II  Harry Bardal | 04/05/06
Same facts, different view  Webmoron | 04/06/06
YOUR logic flawed  dlmeyer@... | 04/06/06
Who can argue with that?  Webmoron | 04/06/06
Big Brass Ones!  handydan918 | 04/06/06
I'm a Mac user...  MacGeek2121 | 04/06/06
Virtualization  not applicable_z | 04/05/06
Apple is a hypocrite  Guy0510 | 04/05/06
Cheese for switchers  Len Rooney | 04/05/06
OSX on regular intel chips  jahruler@... | 04/06/06
Wrong market  A.Sinic | 04/06/06
agreed  shryko | 04/06/06
no hurry at all  Bryn | 04/06/06
Spoken like someone who  Len Rooney | 04/07/06
Spoken like a true believer sipping the  kiddpeat | 04/07/06
Another informed opinion?  Len Rooney | 04/08/06
Definition  baggins_z | 04/06/06
ummm  shryko | 04/06/06
This arguement is so boring  steve@... | 04/06/06
Who here thinks Apple makes money...  DCMann | 04/06/06
Your wish is granted.  crash89 | 04/06/06
Like Chickens in the Hen House - Afraid of Whats Coming?  CFCodeman | 04/06/06
Kind of a jaded view there....  DCMann | 04/07/06
Kind of jaded facts  Len Rooney | 04/08/06
Jaded facts? You might want to read up on Xerox-Apple history  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 04/08/06
I guess you mean  Len Rooney | 04/10/06
OK, which is it?  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 04/10/06
Why is it  Len Rooney | 04/12/06
Why is it that you backed away from your original statement, Len?  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 04/13/06
Since when  Len Rooney | 04/13/06
You said Eithernet  Len Rooney | 04/08/06
To apple or not to apple; that is the question!  mwward | 04/08/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads