On TechRepublic: Why Android beats iPhone
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

November 2nd, 2006

Microsoft changes Vista license terms

Posted by Ed Bott @ 11:00 am

Categories: Licensing, Microsoft, Windows Vista

Tags:

In Focus » See more posts on: Vista

There's good news out of Redmond today for anyone planning a Windows Vista upgrade in 2007. Bowing to intense feedback from the enthusiast community, Microsoft has modified the license terms for retail versions of Windows Vista to allow end users to transfer a retail license from one computer to another, or to upgrade an existing computer without fear that they'll be locked out until they purchase a new license.

The new license terms say: “You may uninstall the software and install it on another device for your use. You may not do so to share this license between devices.”

That's a welcome step back from the sneaky change that had been embedded in the previously published license agreement, which restricted users to a one-time reassignment of a retail license. A subsequent attempt to spin this change as a "clarification" of the existing license terms only made the avalanche of negative feedback worse.

In sheer numbers, this change won't affect many people, but those who are affected represent some of the most vocal and enthusiastic members of the Windows community. I spoke with Shanen Boettcher, General Manager of Windows Vista Product Management, who acknowledged having received "lots of e-mail and other feedback" on this issue.

Here are the practical implications of the change:

  • If you purchase a new computer with Windows Vista preinstalled, or if you build your own PC using an OEM version of Windows, this change doesn't affect you. Your copy is locked to that PC and cannot be transferred to another.
  • If you purchase a retail copy of Windows Vista and install it on a PC, you can install that same copy on another PC, provided you remove it from the original PC. In this scenario, you may be unable to activate the new copy over the Internet, but you will be able to activate over the phone.
  • You can perform an unlimited number of upgrades to an existing computer running a retail version of Windows Vista. If those upgrades are significant enough to cause the computer to look like a new PC, you'll be required to reactivate within 30 days.
  • This change should resolve one issue associated with the use of Windows Vista in virtual machines as well. Under the newly worded license, you should be able to move a virtual copy of Windows Vista to a new physical hardware without violating the terms of the license agreement, provided that you remove the virtual machine files from the old hardware.

One detail about the new license-enforcement terms remains a mystery. How does Microsoft determine when an upgraded PC crosses over the threshold and goes beyond the specified "tolerance level"? In Windows XP, the algorithm used by Windows Product Activation was documented in a Technical Market Bulletin published around the same time Windows XP was released to manufacturing. For Windows Vista, Boettcher says, the algorithm has changed significantly. "The algorithm in Windows Vista has gotten a bit more intelligent and lenient," he told me. "Different components are assigned different values, with the hard drive and motherboard being the highest-weighted components."

Earliler this week, Mary Jo Foley published excerpts from a draft document on Volume Activation 2.0 that appears to confirm this change. That section (which refers to "retail activation") is not included in the final version of the document posted on Microsoft's website.

Boettcher argues that the algorithm has changed from its XP predecessor and that it's subject to change in the never-ending battle with software pirates. For Windows Vista customers, he says, the details are irrelevant: If you upgrade an existing PC, you'll be allowed to reactivate under the new license terms, and you'll have 30 days to do so, which is a significant improvement over the three-day grace period allowed when Windows XP goes "out of tolerance."

Update 3:30PM PST - The Windows Vista Team Blog has this mea culpa:

Our intention behind the original terms was genuinely geared toward combating piracy; however, it’s become clear to us that those original terms were perceived as adversely affecting an important group of customers: PC and hardware enthusiasts.  You who comprise the enthusiast market are vital to us for several reasons, not least of all because of the support you’ve provided us throughout the development of Windows Vista.  We respect the time and expense you go to in customizing, building and rebuilding your hardware and we heard you that the previous terms were seen as an impediment to that — it’s for that reason we’ve made this change.  I hope that this change provides the flexibility you need, and gives you more reason to be excited about the upcoming retail release of our new operating system.

I'll have more to say about the new Windows Vista license terms and some encouraging changes in WGA next week.

Ed BottEd Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Ed Bott

Subscribe to Ed Bott's Microsoft Report via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 73 Talkback(s)
The Purpose In Using Windows
Is paying for a system that prevents doing
what you are paying to do, and then, if you
pay again, and hold your mouth right, don't
blink, and act real nice, you MIGHT, just
might be ab... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Ole Man Posted on: 01/23/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
OK, Ed  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/02/06
Net Gain?  Harry Bardal | 11/02/06
Threats of switching are hollow.  enduser_z | 11/02/06
Small Change?  raven1_z | 11/02/06
The Roman Empire ???  GrosserGnu | 11/02/06
errr... yeah....  startx.jeff | 11/02/06
So MS won you back with this?  enduser_z | 11/02/06
Why would such a small change push them over the edge?  ebrke | 11/03/06
Threats  greatmag123 | 11/03/06
I wouldn't be too hasty...  Media-Ted@... | 11/03/06
What a load of Bull...  Banitsa | 11/04/06
Good job!  tic swayback | 11/02/06
Are you kidding???  Media-Ted@... | 11/03/06
No, I don't think he was kidding  Badgered | 11/06/06
Errare humanum est........To err is human.  Elnitido52 | 11/06/06
Last Straw  morndue | 11/02/06
Um...  petteyg359 | 11/02/06
Sanity Prevails - Finally  MagicSoul | 11/02/06
The coupon is for OEM versions.  ShadeTree | 11/03/06
Oh yeah, until they employ the "changable"  Media-Ted@... | 11/03/06
Hmmm, there is intelligent life in Redmond  maldain | 11/02/06
Maybe  rdhalsteatzd | 11/02/06
Regarding staying with XP  msdead | 11/03/06
air tight non-disclosure  A-USA-Smith | 11/06/06
Windows Vista  Daemeon.Reiydelle@... | 11/02/06
But where does that leave me.  rdhalsteatzd | 11/02/06
vista license  bobnew607 | 11/02/06
The New Pirates  gerar | 11/02/06
Thanks!  Media-Ted@... | 11/03/06
want e-mail and some games  A-USA-Smith | 11/06/06
Something is amiss here....  techboy_z | 11/02/06
No loophole that I can see  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 11/02/06
What if  petteyg359 | 11/02/06
Well...  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 11/02/06
Superman...please help us  gerar | 11/02/06
concentrate instead on innovating  A-USA-Smith | 11/06/06
Thanks, Ed  dram56 | 11/02/06
Your not from around Earth are you?  msdead | 11/03/06
Good job Ed  georgeou | 11/02/06
I don't see how this is going to foil pirated...  sykandtyed | 11/02/06
"So the only ones affected will be legit users"  Ole Man | 01/23/07
It will not end.  joetronics@... | 11/02/06
Hey, maybe you're right!  cyberian_z | 11/02/06
Yeah, while you're enjoying your new FORD  Media-Ted@... | 11/03/06
You Haven't Noticed?  Ole Man | 01/23/07
Pat yerself on the back, ED  Yodaddy | 11/02/06
Back to Plan A!!!  Tankerhank | 11/02/06
Too little... too late....  dlusby@... | 11/02/06
that's a load of bull  kevintxu | 11/03/06
Get your hobb-nailed boots before the price  Media-Ted@... | 11/03/06
Vista License Terms  Odessia@... | 11/02/06
Of course you need separate licenses  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 11/03/06
no  pastorharrysilva | 11/07/06
The new terms allow unlimited transfers  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 11/08/06
Micro$oft's greed is the most significant factor  cyberian_z | 11/02/06
Actually I think MS re thought this because  Michael L Hereid Sr | 11/03/06
Re: MircoSoft's greed is the most significant factor  AJane | 11/03/06
If MS is as greedy as you say  Michael L Hereid Sr | 11/04/06
Good Boy!  Ole Man | 01/23/07
withdrew not because of complaints  A-USA-Smith | 11/06/06
So you don't think that  Michael L Hereid Sr | 11/10/06
I have a hard time understanding this post  Cardhu | 11/11/06
**** Microsoft  DonYan | 11/03/06
Yeah, but ressurrection is a 8itch  Media-Ted@... | 11/03/06
One twist I see...  msdead | 11/03/06
Good news  tech.paul@... | 11/03/06
What about those who buy their "OEM" license over the counter at retail?  ewodrich | 11/05/06
OEM license not released yet  Ed BottZDNet Moderator | 11/06/06
this is my concern  pastorharrysilva | 11/07/06
Sad News For You  Ole Man | 01/23/07
BEST SOLUTION - Just Don't Buy Vista  samiz | 11/06/06
What about prohibitions on VM environments?  rlawler | 11/14/06
The Purpose In Using Windows  Ole Man | 01/23/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline