On TV.com: Talking with SMALLVILLE'S Lois Lane
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 7th, 2009

Apple to developers: Conform or die

Posted by Ed Burnette @ 2:32 pm

Categories: Apple, General, Programming, iPhone

Tags: Apple iPhone, Developer, Apple Inc., Beta, Ed Burnette

In an email blast to registered iPhone developers this afternoon, Apple warned developers to test their apps with iPhone OS 3.0 beta 5 right away. Beginning immediately, any submission to the App store that doesn’t work right under the latest beta will not be approved. (Gosh, I hope the beta doesn’t have any bugs in it.)

In addition, when the production 3.0 comes out for everyone this summer, existing apps that aren’t compatible face removal from the store at Apple’s discretion. Here’s the full text:

App Store submissions now being reviewed on iPhone OS 3.0

Test your app with iPhone OS 3.0 beta 5 today.

All apps must be compatible with iPhone OS 3.0
Millions of iPhone and iPod touch customers will move to iPhone OS 3.0 this summer. Beginning today, all submissions to the App Store will be reviewed on the latest beta of iPhone OS 3.0. If your app submission is not compatible with iPhone OS 3.0, it will not be approved.

Existing apps in the App Store should already run on iPhone OS 3.0 without modification, but you should test your existing apps with iPhone OS 3.0 to ensure there are no compatibility issues. After iPhone OS 3.0 becomes available to customers, any app that is incompatible with iPhone OS 3.0 may be removed from the App Store.

Begin testing now
iPhone OS 3.0 beta 5 and iPhone SDK 3.0 beta 5 are now posted to the iPhone Dev Center. Start testing today to ensure your application runs on iPhone OS 3.0. Visit the iPhone Dev Center for additional development information including iPhone SDK Release Notes for iPhone OS 3.0 beta 5 and Getting ready for iPhone OS 3.0.

Some developers are already crying foul. Alasdair Allan comments:

It is a burden if you only have one development machine. Applications developed under SDK 3.0 can not be submitted to the App Store review process, even if they were developed under the SDK 3.0 but targeted at 2.x.

That means, if you only have one Mac to develop on, or one iPhone or iPod touch to test on, then you’re effectively locked out from submitting new applications to the App Store until Apple release 3.0 to the public, or possibly only slightly before if we’re that lucky. Effectively this brings a halt to app releases or updates to existing apps already in the store from small developers until much later this year…

Ed BurnetteEd Burnette is a professional developer and author of several articles and books about computing including Hello, Android: Introducing Google's Mobile Development Platform, 2nd Edition. For disclosure of Ed's industry affiliations, click here or to view his full profile click here.

Email Ed Burnette

Subscribe to Dev Connection via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 84 Talkback(s)
I've found a great podcast for you guys
Try Grammar Girl (http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com). I've been listening to it on the way to work.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Ed Burnette Posted on: 05/13/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
What if end users don't want 3.0?  Samic | 05/07/09
It's a free upgrade..... so why wouldn't you want it?  Lerianis | 05/07/09
Not sure that is the case for iPod Touch users  Richard Flude | 05/07/09
Upgrade may not be free  Ed BurnetteZDNet Moderator | 05/07/09
Umm, because I've come to depend on my applications  baileysc | 05/08/09
'Cause It's Not Free  rkinne01 | 05/08/09
Surely you jest  TwighlightShadow1 | 05/09/09
You are not forced to upgrade.  msalzberg | 05/09/09
Apple has complete apathy for developers. nt  T1Oracle | 05/07/09
Dear god, cry me a river  Kaiwai | 05/08/09
Heavy handed approach  Ed BurnetteZDNet Moderator | 05/08/09
maybe  john@... | 05/08/09
Name one...  jasonp@... | 05/08/09
Application Certification  baileysc | 05/08/09
What a joke certfication is  Kaiwai | 05/08/09
And what makes you think Apple's testing will be any better?  baileysc | 05/08/09
Quality...Tough concept for some...  CowLauncher | 05/08/09
Quality?  ShadowGIATL | 05/08/09
Apple isn't worried about the customer  rkinne01 | 05/08/09
And when you come up with something as compelling  mlindl | 05/11/09
Why? I know better than to produce software for tyrants... nt  T1Oracle | 05/08/09
Sounds a lot like Microsoft... I am so with you on this.  HypnoToad72 | 05/08/09
What?!! you can't say that out loud...  ShadowGIATL | 05/08/09
Yeah!  john_gillespie@... | 05/08/09
Congrats to Apple  croberts | 05/07/09
Overly optimistic  Ed BurnetteZDNet Moderator | 05/07/09
Overly pessimistic are we?  Kid Icarus-21097050858087920245213802267493 | 05/08/09
The art of headline writing  Ed BurnetteZDNet Moderator | 05/08/09
C'mon Ed  john@... | 05/08/09
Too much blind faith  T1Oracle | 05/08/09
If Apple was actually responsible  T1Oracle | 05/08/09
iPhone developers always knew they were at Apples mercy  baileysc | 05/08/09
Boohoo  frgough | 05/07/09
Very funny (NT)  seosamh_z | 05/08/09
I'm with you on this one, frgough  John Zern | 05/08/09
Big company's law  Gladiatorcn | 05/07/09
Not a given right to be able to produce software for a platform  Patanjali | 05/07/09
Hopefully you are not biased  Gladiatorcn | 05/08/09
I think you are missing something  baileysc | 05/08/09
Nice totalitarian way of thinking  hiraghm@... | 05/08/09
Message has been deleted.  jinishans | 05/07/09
Will i be allowed to continue in 2.2 until I read good reviews about 3.0..?  jinishans | 05/07/09
Yep.  Bruizer | 05/11/09
RE: Apple to developers: Conform or die  notlehs | 05/07/09
Because..  ravinsp | 05/07/09
Why do people write for Windows?  Ed BurnetteZDNet Moderator | 05/08/09
On the other hand...  msalzberg | 05/08/09
Yeah!  john_gillespie@... | 05/08/09
A majority of those issues...  msalzberg | 05/08/09
Disagree  condelirios | 05/08/09
I hear the initial email draft went something like this...  iTeaBoy | 05/08/09
Funny  medezark@... | 05/08/09
Now it all makes sense  Lunatic59 | 05/11/09
RE: Apple to developers: Conform or die  faiz553 | 05/08/09
So yet more fear, uncertainty doubt.  john@... | 05/08/09
Opinions R Us  Ed BurnetteZDNet Moderator | 05/09/09
I find...  ShadowGIATL | 05/09/09
Apple to developers - Build your app store....  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/08/09
I assume you're joking ...  baileysc | 05/08/09
Defacto Delete Ability....  zenwalker | 05/08/09
Stupid Question that I should already know the answer to  baileysc | 05/08/09
How dare they...  jasonp@... | 05/08/09
RE: Apple to developers: Conform or die  baileysc | 05/08/09
Huh?  msalzberg | 05/10/09
Welcome back Amiga  hiraghm@... | 05/08/09
RE: Apple to developers: Conform or die  XArt | 05/08/09
They'll never do it  BALTHOR | 05/08/09
Apple to developers: Conform or die. Isn't that  John Zern | 05/08/09
Oh...  ShadowGIATL | 05/09/09
Smart people with consciouses don't buy iPhones.  T1Oracle | 05/08/09
Smart people don't..  msalzberg | 05/10/09
Smart people don't ...  Lunatic59 | 05/11/09
Look up the definition.............  msalzberg | 05/11/09
Use, not meaning.  Lunatic59 | 05/11/09
Goodness, you still don't get it...............  msalzberg | 05/11/09
Grammar School.  Lunatic59 | 05/11/09
I've found a great podcast for you guys  Ed BurnetteZDNet Moderator | 05/13/09
Another reason why I'll not buy and develop for an iPhone.  Grayson Peddie | 05/09/09
That's assuming you're ...  msalzberg | 05/10/09
The bottom line: it's Apple's App Store  Fred Fredrickson | 05/10/09
BTW, Ed, it's Comply or Die not Conform or Die  mlindl | 05/11/09
I thought it was Convert or Die. [nt]  olePigeon | 05/11/09
In New Hampshire ...  Lunatic59 | 05/11/09
Avoiding the Vista effect...  Bruizer | 05/11/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here