On CBS.com: Get More On Amazing Race Eliminated Team
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

December 4th, 2008

Schwartz: Three reasons you need JavaFX

Posted by Ed Burnette @ 5:03 am

Categories: General, Java, Programming, Sun

Tags: Developer, Java Platform, Sun Microsystems Inc., JCP, Audience, JavaFX, Ed, Jonathan, Microsoft Obviously, Java

[Ed] Q. Over time, should we expect to see a de-emphasis of regular Java APIs like Swing in favor of JavaFX?

[Jonathan] No, because there is no one hammer for all nails. We’re interested in trying to serve as diverse and as rich a set of developers as possible. Some of our developers don’t care about user interfaces at all, others believe everything needs to be based on JavaScript, and others want a more robust or interactive 3D interaction environment. So we want to appeal to them all; we don’t want to try to dictate the answer to all their problems.

[Ed] Q. JavaFX was developed outside the JCP/JSR process. Does Sun still believe in the JCP like it once did?

[Jonathan] We believe in the JCP as a vehicle for establishing standards. The JCP, given its very nature, has been a tough place to innovate. So, we’re going to certainly work with other JCP members on trying to build standards around the innovations that we’re all creating. I mean, all the members of the JCP are very innovative inventive companies. I think the JCP is best seen as a means of establishing standards rather than a means of kind of up-ending history with disruptive innovations.

[Ed] Q. What’s the take-away message for developers regarding today’s launch?

[Jonathan] The take-away message for developers is two things: First, the proof is in the pudding. Go download NetBeans with the new JavaFX and go give it a whirl, and you’ll get a sense pretty quickly for what you’re able to do that you wouldn’t be able to do with other technologies or even with the historic Java platform.

The second message is a different one for developers, one I think that many have already picked up on in the past few years, which is: Audience is everything. You have to own your own audience if you want to own your own business. Browsers have become hostile, I don’t think that’s news, and the Java platform with JavaFX specifically enables you to own your own audience. To the extent you want to build your own social network, you don’t want to have to navigate through someone else’s default settings to build an audience. Whether you’re building a new network service, a new social service, or a utility service, owning your own audience is core to creating opportunity and that’s what we want to enable developers to do.

Next: Will we see it on the (fill in your favorite device here)? >

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Ed BurnetteEd Burnette is a professional developer and author of several articles and books about computing including Hello, Android: Introducing Google's Mobile Development Platform, 2nd Edition. For disclosure of Ed's industry affiliations, click here or to view his full profile click here.

Email Ed Burnette

Subscribe to Dev Connection via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 28 Talkback(s)
I'm not sure of that...
... look at Enron. (Read the rest)
Posted by: 914four Posted on: 12/05/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
What does it matter, Sun is history  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/04/08
Java won't die with Sun.  Anton Philidor | 12/04/08
Are you certain that is true  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/04/08
Yes it is  Ed BurnetteZDNet Moderator | 12/05/08
because M$ has a helping hand in this  Linux Geek | 12/04/08
I wouldn't count Sun out yet...  914four | 12/05/08
He's delusional  PB_z | 12/04/08
RE: Schwartz: Three reasons you need JavaFX  super_J | 12/04/08
Um actually not so much...  Johnny Vegas | 12/04/08
sliverlight is a "hidden, proprietary" MESS.  Rick S._z | 12/04/08
Ooooh better tighten your foil hat  Johnny Vegas | 12/04/08
No Silverlight for me... JavaFX sounds great.  BillDem | 12/05/08
And it will grow hair...  914four | 12/05/08
Distribution numbers  Ed BurnetteZDNet Moderator | 12/05/08
Java is already dead  jackbond | 12/04/08
Re: Java is already dead  super_J | 12/04/08
Number one because no one wants the jobs?  PB_z | 12/04/08
number one ...  super_J | 12/04/08
actually it's number 2  markbn | 12/04/08
RE: Schwartz: Three reasons you need JavaFX  viruserZDNet Moderator | 12/04/08
I don't even need Java...  BrooklynTree | 12/04/08
No one does any more  Johnny Vegas | 12/05/08
Until...  914four | 12/05/08
The last company on a 'death watch' was Apple  SunnyGuy53 | 12/04/08
Microsoft has too much cash to go under  Ed BurnetteZDNet Moderator | 12/05/08
I'm not sure of that...  914four | 12/05/08
RE: Schwartz: Three reasons you need JavaFX  bcswartz | 12/05/08
Sun is history? doesn't matter...  maguilar2k | 12/05/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline