On CBS MoneyWatch: Why Debit Cards Are Dangerous
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

November 27th, 2009

The high carbon-cost of search . . .

Posted by Tom Foremski @ 4:48 pm

Categories: Business strategy

Tags: Google Inc., Bandwidth, Index, SVW, Internet, Tom Foremski

Search is the most important Internet application and it is vital to the health of the Internet and to online commerce.

But looking more closely at search, and how the index is compiled, I’m beginning to realize it is highly inefficient and places a huge burden on the Internet.

I’d love to know how much processing power and how much bandwidth is used by the dozens of spiderbots crawling the web and compiling their own index.

If I look at my server stats, the amount of resources spiderbots take is huge. SVW is visited by 16 spiderbots daily and they consume 45% of my bandwidth (they return only 6% of total user traffic.)

Not every site will receive as many spiderbot visits but it would still represent a very large burden. It’s a huge inefficiency at the heart of the Internet.

And with that comes the carbon cost of the energy required to run the servers and communications networks — all to service an inefficient search industry.

What if there were a single search index held in common and administered by a non-profit that everyone could access? Surely that would negate the need for anyone to crawl the web and access the same data to construct their own search index?

The energy savings globally would be massive. And it would free-up resources, resulting in a faster Internet and one that has room to expand, without needing to invest in any new servers or communication lines.

Google founders originally believed that search should be in the public domain. Google could still be Google because its value lies in its unique ability to analyze the search index and rank the results, and serve up ads.

Surely it would be more efficient to have a single search index held in common than to have the current system where as much as 1/2 of bandwidth is consumed to create multiple indexes of the same data?

And it wouldn’t affect the business of the search engines, in fact, it could result in a platform that spurs innovation, allowing smaller companies to create new algorithms and improve search — the single most important application on the Internet.

- - -

Please see:

What if the search-index was run by a non-profit? GOOG founders once supported that idea

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 11 Talkback(s)
I find it hard to believe...
that spiders are eating up 45% of your bandwidth. Either you have no traffic on your site, or no bandwidth or your numbers are flawed.

Search is probably one of the most important function of the Internet (IMHO). It should be expected to consume bandwidth accordingly. ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: bjbrock Posted on: 11/29/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Well compared to having to actually drive somewhere, or call a human being  DonnieBoy | 11/27/09
Oh my  Climatechangefraud.com | 11/28/09
RE: The high carbon-cost of search . . .  shollomon | 11/27/09
All you have to do....  bjbrock | 11/29/09
God, and you get paid to think?  trance2tec | 11/27/09
OMG another blogger goes The Green Religion.  The Flintstones | 11/27/09
Easily resolved  Saurondor. | 11/28/09
http://www.climatechangefraud.com/  Climatechangefraud.com | 11/28/09
RE: The high carbon-cost of search . . .  Richard B | 11/28/09
re: high cost  Climatechangefraud.com | 11/28/09
I find it hard to believe...  bjbrock | 11/29/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here