On CHOW: Should that woman be drinking?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

September 2nd, 2006

Are Maps mashups patentable?

Posted by Denise Howell @ 10:47 pm

Categories: Collaboration, Licenses, Live Web, Mashups, Patent

Tags:

In Focus » See more posts on: Software Patents

Someone asked me today whether they could file a patent application concerning their Google Maps mashup.  Not being a patent lawyer, I haven’t the foggiest, but it’s an interesting question.  I don’t see anything in the API Terms that would specifically preclude patenting a maps app.  (Commercial use of the API seems to be ok, though a bit of confusion about this is apparent when you search on the issue:  "The Service may be used only for services that are generally accessible to consumers without charge."  See also Jeremy Zawodny, Yahoo! Maps API, now for commercial use too.)

wikipatents
I assume that under the right circumstances the answer to my question is probably yes, but I’d enjoy hearing the thoughts of those more in the know.  Regardless, I can think of no better subject matter for inclusion in WikiPatents, "a public community that reviews US patents and pending patent applications. The public can add prior art references for a given patent, vote on the relevancy of both original and user-added references, and make comments about how the prior art is related to a patent. Users may also vote on various market and technical merits of patents and patent applications" — something I discussed briefly with Dan Farber in his podcast this week.

[Updated September 3, 2006 @ 8:53 am:]  The related, perhaps controlling, question is the extent to which incorporation of another’s patented work (even where, as here, it’s done with permission) might preclude the patentability of the new work due to issues with prior art, novelty, originality, etc.  In the comments, Dave Leigh also hits on why this question struck me as intriguing to begin with, and why I first took a look at the terms of the Google Maps API.  It seems like the ability to patent something based on an open API would be contrary to at least some of the motivations behind the API’s liberal terms of use, so I wondered if this was something Google (or others providing APIs?) has tried to limit explicitly and contractually.

Denise HowellDenise Howell is an appellate, intellectual property and technology lawyer who enjoys broad industry recognition for her expertise on the intersection of emerging technologies and law. See her full profile and disclosure of her industry affiliations.

Email Denise Howell

Subscribe to Lawgarithms via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 9 Talkback(s)
NO!!!
The fact that so many high profile Patent Trolls are now losing their battles with seemingly solid patents (MercExchange vs. Ebay, NTP vs RIM/Blackberry, Forget/JPEG vs Patent Office) either in the Su... (Read the rest)
Posted by: wildranger Posted on: 09/07/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Can vs. Should  dave.leigh@... | 09/03/06
re Can vs. Should  Denise HowellZDNet Moderator | 09/03/06
So who has the patent rights on map mashups?  jeb0 | 09/03/06
Why should anybody?  dave.leigh@... | 09/03/06
Why should anybody do what?!  jeb0 | 09/04/06
Why should anybody have the patent rights to map mashups?  dave.leigh@... | 09/05/06
OK  jeb0 | 09/05/06
Re: OK  dave.leigh@... | 09/05/06
NO!!!  wildranger | 09/07/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Top Rated

    Archives

    ZDNet Blogs

    White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

    Meet Doc