On CBS MoneyWatch: 6 things NOT to do on Twitter, Facebook
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

February 17th, 2008

Dear Pamela Jones:

Posted by Paul Murphy @ 9:29 am

Categories: Linux

Tags: SCO Group Inc., IBM Corp., Team Management, Open Source, E-voting, Linux, Management, Government, Operating Systems, Software

As you must know this Stephen Norris take-over at SCO poses a real risk to groklaw - what happens to your business if IBM takes this opportunity to settle?

The basis for such a settlement is obvious: SCO works to open source everything, IBM makes good on costs - the only real question there is what happens with respect to Boies et al.

While I don’t think it likely that this will happen next week - not because IBM can hope to prevail in court, but because IBM’s senior management isn’t ready to make the decision yet - the threat to groklaw is clear. When the case ends, as it inevitably will, your role will end with it - and then what do you do?

As you know I disagree with the tone, emphasis, assumptions, and omissions in almost everything you write but also greatly admire how you’ve built and maintained the groklaw community. Thus I see the specifics of what you’ve done in whipping up anti-SCO sentiment as a disservice to the Linux community (not to mention truth, justice, and the American way) but also see the work, the strategies, and the commitment that’s gone into doing it as setting the standard for future attempts to use the web to further a cause.

And that’s really the spirit in which I’m writing this note: voting reform, expecially electronic voting reform, is a cause to which your skills, your commitment, your community, and your public persona could usefully and effectively be applied.

I know the technology, you know the law; I know where the legal research should start, you’ve got skilled researchers - together we’re the bipartisan dream team for fomenting (e)voting reform.

So lets work together - at the very least lets talk about what needs to be done and how the power you’ve built in groklaw can be used for good - oh, and if the thought of working with me is a little much for you, well if we can agree on a directions I’ll be perfectly okay with seeing you go off to find a more sympatico technical team to work with.

You’ve got my email - use it. Please.

Paul MurphyPaul Murphy (a pseudonym) is an IT consultant specializing in Unix and related technologies. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.


Email Paul Murphy

Subscribe to Managing L'unix via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 48 Talkback(s)
Old post, but a comment anyway
I'm not going to say anything about the proposal in itself; if a community thrives on a goal, and can't subsist once that goal is reached, then it doesn't have to. As far as I know, Groklaw "partners"... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Mitch 74 Posted on: 05/07/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Dear "Paul"  kozmcrae | 02/17/08
nice insults - but you're wrong on all matters of substance  murph_zZDNet Moderator | 02/17/08
SCO v. IBM was a contractual issue (at least according to Court documents)  B.O.F.H. | 02/17/08
nature of the dispute  murph_zZDNet Moderator | 02/17/08
The court documents are out there, read them!  B.O.F.H. | 02/17/08
Yeah, but what a source!  TtfnJohn | 02/18/08
Dear Rudy the Rabbit  junknstuff@... | 02/17/08
Paul is....  junknstuff@... | 02/17/08
translation?  tombalablomba | 02/17/08
Mmmm  junknstuff@... | 02/17/08
Sorry Murph, you are NOT in the same league. But nice try.  D. T. Schmitz | 02/17/08
I appreciate the sentiment  murph_zZDNet Moderator | 02/17/08
Amazing  TripleII | 02/17/08
I quote your talkback as direct support of my point.  TripleII | 02/17/08
Forgot, your source is Maureen O'Gara?  TripleII | 02/17/08
Why settle  murph_zZDNet Moderator | 02/17/08
The courts have already said Novell owns Unix.  B.O.F.H. | 02/17/08
Rewriting History  TripleII | 02/17/08
Bollocks  dave.leigh@... | 02/17/08
Re-instating History  TripleII | 02/17/08
There You Go Again  DannyO_0x98 | 02/17/08
Tally so far  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/17/08
SCO COMING BAAAAACK!  steveballmar@... | 02/17/08
Low hits?  Erik Engbrecht | 02/17/08
If you had the slightest honest interest...  dave.leigh@... | 02/17/08
BTW...  dave.leigh@... | 02/17/08
By being consistent  murph_zZDNet Moderator | 02/18/08
By being bull-headed, you mean.  dave.leigh@... | 02/18/08
Just a contract dispute?  softdrat@... | 02/17/08
RE: Dear Pamela Jones:  none none | 02/17/08
How About Examples or Citations - Like Groklaw Always Does  smartguy2@... | 02/17/08
Dear Pamela Jones: You are right  deaf_e_kate | 02/18/08
Dear rtfa:  murph_zZDNet Moderator | 02/18/08
I did but everyone else has said what  deaf_e_kate | 02/18/08
If IBM settles...  John L. Ries | 02/18/08
that's what I think too -well, not about the day job  murph_zZDNet Moderator | 02/18/08
Are you assuming...  John L. Ries | 02/18/08
No, I'm not  murph_zZDNet Moderator | 02/18/08
RE: Dear Pamela Jones:  jurgen.manycolored@... | 02/18/08
Right, except, of course  murph_zZDNet Moderator | 02/18/08
well, not of course..but  TtfnJohn | 02/18/08
Sure it's about Linux  JesperFrimann | 02/19/08
Nothing to do with Linux  softdrat@... | 02/18/08
Wrong: This is all about Linux  partner50153572@... | 02/18/08
Apparently the law is not your strong suit  partner50153572@... | 02/18/08
Ummmmm, ok!?  Sysadm1n | 02/18/08
RE: Dear Rudy:  shoktai@... | 02/19/08
Old post, but a comment anyway  Mitch 74 | 05/07/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here