On TV.com: 2009's Most PIRATED TV Show
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

July 10th, 2006

Are Tape Backup systems obsolete?

Posted by George Ou @ 2:45 am

Categories: Infrastructure, Networking, Servers

Tags:

One of the most tedious and complex jobs in the world of IT is data backup.  Not only is it complex, but the use of mechanical Tape loaders make the system very prone to breakage and the Tapes themselves are not very durable and must be discarded on an annual or at least on a biannual basis.  Conventional IT wisdom has always dictated that Tape Backup is the only way to economically backup large amounts of data, but does this still hold true in the age of ultra-cheap hot-swappable Hard Drives?

Let’s take a state-of-the-art Tape backup system like the HP Storageworks 1/8 Ultrium 960 Autoloader.  I chose this particular device because it represents one of the most cost effective Tape Backup solutions with very high performance and capacity at a relatively low price.  Each Ultrium 960 Tape has a true capacity of 400 Gigabytes and the HP Autoloader is capable of housing 8 Tapes at a time with a read/write throughput of 80 megabytes per second.  The lowest price I found for Ultrium 960 Tape was $68 per Tape and the HP Autoloader was $5000.

Now we look at what it would take to do the exact same thing using Serial ATA hot-swappable Hard Drives.  400 GB SATA Hard Drives cost $142 and it would probably cost an extra $800 for a server that could house all the extra drives internally compared to something that would act as the server for the Tape Backup Autoloader.  We won’t count the SATA controllers because the Tape Backup system would need a fast SCSI controller anyways so it would be a wash in this respect.

If we tried to build two 8 by 400 GB backup sets which is 6.4 terabytes, the Tape Backup solution would come out to $6088 and the SATA Hard Drive based solution would be $2272.  If we didn’t actually need that big a backup set, the Hard Drive based solution would be even more economical since the $5000 Autoloader isn’t needed.  In order for the Tape Backup system to become more economical, I calculated that it would require more than 56 Tapes to break even.  That would be a massive 28 by 400 GB backup set which is massive even for large enterprises.  Furthermore, Hard Drives are rapidly dropping in price and 300 GB Hard Drives are already in the sub $100 range.  The other factor that comes in to play is that Hard Drives last 2 to 4 times longer because Tapes are suppose to be rotated ever year while most larger hard drives have a 5 year warrantee so it can be argued that even the media itself is cheaper since you don’t have to replace them as often.

Furthermore, Hard Drive based solutions are MUCH faster than any Tape Backup solution.  Having 8 SATA Hard Drives can operate at the same time and have an aggregate throughput of about five times faster than a single Ultrium 960 Tape.  While an Autoloader can hold 8 Tapes, only one Tape can be read or written to at a time.  Autoloaders are also mechanically complex and they break down often and they’re very difficult to manage.  Note that in order to fully saturate the capacity of 8 Hard Drives, you must have a 10 Gigabit Ethernet adapter on the server.  Fortunately the cost of these adapters have come down to around $1000 but you’ll still need a 10 Gigabit capable switch to plug it in to.

The other HUGE factor is the fact that you don’t need to "rewind" a Hard Drive since it is random access.  This actually permits the use of bit-level backup solutions that let you maintain a synchronized copy of a file system without copying the entire file.  Windows Server 2003 for example would also allow you to implement a single-point storage system where replicas of files are only stored once on a file system.  The combination of all these factors can increase backup and restore performance several times.

Most modern backup software will permit the use of Hard Drive based solutions.  Off-site storage services don’t care if you hand them a container with a Tape or a Hard Drive.  The only issue with Hard Drives is that you must put them in a thick-padded shock absorbent container but with proper care they should last much longer than Tapes [Update: Reader Adunlap posted this link where to get the padded casing].  So are the days of the Tape out numbered?  Only time will tell and it takes a long time to change conventional wisdom.

George Ou is Technical Director of ZDNet. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 125 Talkback(s)
RE: Are Tape Backup systems obsolete?
I realize this is a pretty old post. I stumbled onto it from Digg's archive. I have to disagree with some of the numbers here though. You can get an LTO-4 tape drive from Quantum for under $2,000. The... (Read the rest)
Posted by: jkieth Posted on: 04/16/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Linux Server Hack #38  D-T-Schmitz | 07/10/06
Rsync over ssh  barsteward | 07/11/06
one important thing to note  tombalablomba | 07/10/06
Tapes are very sensitive to other factors  georgeou | 07/10/06
DIY is always cheaper  Roger Ramjet | 07/10/06
Why TSM  mark.aggleton@... | 07/10/06
Business Finance 101  fondy | 07/10/06
Buying through IBM  Roger Ramjet | 07/10/06
re: Business Finance 101  chris_x | 07/10/06
re: business finance 101  carmenvb | 07/13/06
Then that's your own fault  georgeou | 07/10/06
Depends on what we are talking  nucrash | 07/10/06
Rotation  pughjl@... | 07/10/06
Under protected  wolf_z | 07/10/06
I disagree  kckn4fun | 07/10/06
Were are not as bad..  Patrick Jones | 07/10/06
home storage  jshaw4343 | 07/10/06
However..  Patrick Jones | 07/10/06
more than just disaster recovery  jshaw4343 | 07/10/06
And..  Patrick Jones | 07/10/06
Weekend Backups @ Home  airforcedad21144@... | 07/10/06
Who says you wouldn't rotate and off-site the hard drives?  georgeou | 07/10/06
or wiped out by...  richvball44 | 07/11/06
Reality check?  medwards@... | 05/15/07
And the firm you work for is?  Cornhead | 12/29/06
Maybe...but  bidemytime | 07/10/06
Off-site is not a problem  vince@... | 07/10/06
A terabyte is nothing....  jinko | 07/10/06
Off-site is not a problem  leharrell | 07/10/06
Firewire GOOD, but for smaller jobs  georgeou | 07/10/06
Did you miss the "hot-swap" and off-site part?  georgeou | 07/10/06
I did miss that  bidemytime | 07/10/06
The only reason you keep that many tapes is because they can't be trusted  georgeou | 07/10/06
Then I guess you and I just disagree  bidemytime | 07/10/06
Now two sets, but 1/2 the number of disks  georgeou | 07/10/06
Ahhhhhh...  bidemytime | 07/10/06
No, you just have less redundancy  georgeou | 07/10/06
Yeah, but...  bidemytime | 07/12/06
I totally agree  marco.romero@... | 07/10/06
What are you talking about?  georgeou | 07/10/06
Its your choice, all options are valid  assafiomar@... | 07/11/06
One Change...  jcs26 | 07/10/06
problem with external drives  mseachrist | 07/10/06
Not quite...  jcs26 | 07/10/06
Or consider NTFS mount points  CTSTechs.com | 07/14/06
duration?  richvball44 | 07/11/06
You just figured this out?  kckn4fun | 07/10/06
Swapping Disks  Edj_z | 07/10/06
And more  Richard Flude | 07/10/06
In any case, it's WAY better than Tape reliability  georgeou | 07/10/06
It's not just about "price"....  jinko | 07/10/06
Autoloaders are a mechanical nightmare  georgeou | 07/10/06
Check your insurance  bv@... | 07/10/06
True, but...  jcs26 | 07/10/06
hard drive backups are great  afisk | 07/10/06
Forget hard disk, go optical...  MV_z | 07/10/06
400GB HD / 8.5GB Dual-Layered DVD Disc...  Grayson Peddie | 07/10/06
Umm... sure  nucrash | 07/10/06
DVD changer/writer  gibsonmh@... | 07/11/06
Kiss your Cost Savings Good Bye  nucrash | 07/11/06
Are you kidding?  fknight@... | 07/11/06
Power usage, reliability of cheap SATA arrays  Chas_ | 07/10/06
Probably wouldn't use RAID for backup  WiredGuy | 07/10/06
Your comments on RAID is not correct  georgeou | 07/10/06
Your comments about SCSI are not correct  nucrash | 07/10/06
Not sure where we disagree  georgeou | 07/10/06
Your point #2, not #1  nucrash | 07/11/06
So you think SATA can't be used in RAID?  georgeou | 07/11/06
Yes and No....  nucrash | 07/11/06
10 GB Ethernet Adapter???  nucrash | 07/11/06
Great point on partial stroking!  georgeou | 07/11/06
SATA AUTOMAID  jeanne@... | 07/10/06
Other Factors  alanrbriggs | 07/10/06
Tape Backup  roelofs@... | 07/10/06
Wrong debate  georgeou | 07/10/06
Something left out  Endoscopy | 07/10/06
Depends on how you look at it...  ju1ce | 07/10/06
What makes you think hard drives are smaller?  georgeou | 07/10/06
What makes me think they are smaller?  ju1ce | 07/10/06
Don't fret George...  ju1ce | 07/10/06
Ultrium 960 is huge for tape  georgeou | 07/10/06
Hahah...  nucrash | 07/11/06
Small companies OK Large need tape  tombat | 07/13/06
Are disk backup best practices published?  mmay | 07/10/06
Excellent question  georgeou | 07/10/06
Experience to date  Edj_z | 07/11/06
Level of redundancy depends on need and budget  georgeou | 07/11/06
Real life  slow_descent | 07/10/06
Useful to a certain extent  georgeou | 07/10/06
Tapes (shudder)  TonyMcS | 07/10/06
I've been recommending it to clients  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/10/06
Terabyte drives are old news.  B.O.F.H. | 07/10/06
Wrong, there is no terabyte drive yet, those are multiple drives  georgeou | 07/10/06
George, there are 1TB disks!  B.O.F.H. | 07/10/06
LaCie Big Disk = 2x 500 Gb  Julien Collot | 07/10/06
But we are talking Price  nucrash | 07/11/06
There are NO 1 TB disks yet, the procuct he points to is two merged disks  georgeou | 07/11/06
Still proving my point though  nucrash | 07/11/06
Tape backup will be good for 5 years  KeithCash | 07/10/06
Actually, it's even less desireable there  georgeou | 07/10/06
Hardware Vs Software  psx2sg@... | 07/10/06
That's what the offsite one is for  georgeou | 07/10/06
Tape backup obsolete ?  ohansky | 07/11/06
Combine both and get the best outcome  assafiomar@... | 07/11/06
....or do you ?  Edj_z | 07/11/06
You are misleading folks  kg806 | 07/11/06
Ask a question, but don't accuse me of misleading  georgeou | 07/11/06
Other options  dave.leigh@... | 07/11/06
$142 is for the equivalent though,  nucrash | 07/11/06
Combining Tape and Disks Works Well  delwinf | 07/11/06
Don't use RAID for backup  georgeou | 07/11/06
Other points you might like to know...  nucrash | 07/11/06
Hard drives prone to failure - BUT dont let that stop you  kokuryu | 07/11/06
Hard drives are 10 times more reliable than tape  georgeou | 07/11/06
Speaking About Backups  chalsall | 07/11/06
Major catastrophies  d.s.williams | 07/12/06
Transporting of Backups  burtoni | 07/12/06
Oh wouldn't it be nice....  nucrash | 07/12/06
Tape systems depend on size  tombat | 07/12/06
The tape you're talking about is very small  georgeou | 07/12/06
The real bennifit is in the restore.  D-cat | 07/12/06
Sure Disk is ok for your house but cache in the enterprise  tombat | 07/13/06
Redundancy isn't a bad thing  D-cat | 07/13/06
Tapes are durable...  gentrythornton | 09/11/08
RE: Are Tape Backup systems obsolete?  jkieth | 04/16/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

Top Rated

    advertisement

    Archives

    ZDNet Blogs

    White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads