On TechRepublic: Weirdest error messages of all time
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 7th, 2007

TJX's failure to secure Wi-Fi could cost $1B

Posted by George Ou @ 6:23 pm

Categories: Desktop, Infrastructure, Mobile/Wireless, Networking, News, Security, Servers

Tags: Security, WEP, WLAN, Server, Wi-Fi, Encryption, Wireless, Key, TJX, George Ou

The news of the TJ Maxx data breach has rocked the retail and banking industry, and many estimate that it will cost hundreds of millions or even a billion-plus dollars in financial damage. It was already widely reported back in March that the TJ Maxx breach was probably due to an insecure wireless network, but the Wall Street Journal is now reporting that it happened outside of a St. Paul, MN, Marshalls discount store in July 2005 (Marshalls is owned by TJX Cos.)  WSJ is reporting that investigators believe that the hacker used a laptop and a telescope-shaped antenna.

Joseph Pereira of the WSJ writes:
The $17.4-billion retailer's wireless network had less security than many people have on their home networks, and for 18 months the company — which also owns T.J. Maxx, Home Goods and A.J. Wright — had no idea what was going on. The hackers, who have not been found, downloaded at least 45.7 million credit- and debit-card numbers from about a year's worth of records, the company says. A person familiar with the firm's internal investigation says they may have grabbed as many as 200 million card numbers all told from four years' records.

[Update 4:45AM - While Pereira cited research firm Forrester's estimate, Boston.com quotes a $1.35 billion dollar estimate from Forrester.  Others like Dark Reading are reporting that the fine could be as high as $4.5B.

IPLocks, a compliance and database security company, is basing the estimate on the accumulated costs of fines, legal fees, notification expenses and brand impairment, according to Adrian Lane, the company's chief technology officer. He added that $100 per lost record is an average figure for major data breaches, but they calculated expenses particular to TJX and came out with the same figure.

The Ponemon Institute, a think tank focused on record privacy and data protection, expects the TJX breach costs to be even higher. They cite costs in the range of $182.00 per record, based on research from November 2006 of the cost of breaches incurred in 31 separate incidents. For TJX, this translates to $8.6 billion.]

WEP was originally demonstrated to be broken back in 2001 and it was broken even worse by a factor of 20 in early 2005 and then broken again by another factor of 20 last month by German researchers. WEP 104-bit encryption can now be cracked in under a minute on an 802.11g network using active ARP-replay packet-injection techniques. Since the TJX breach started around mid 2005, the attackers could have easily cracked the network within half an hour using second-generation of WEP cracking tools.

What's most alarming about this is that most of the major retailers during that time were running WEP and many are STILL running some form of WEP. There's no reason to believe the same attackers didn't try this sort of attack on many other retailers and are still actively attacking networks today. Many businesses and organizations, including hospitals, are STILL running WEP or some other useless form of security.  Some are running a slightly better enterprise version of WEP, which uses per-session per-user dynamic keys that supposedly rotate every hour, but even that's worthless since the third-generation of WEP cracking tools can break WEP in under a minute.

When I worked as a security consultant for major retailers and organizations during 2004 to 2005, I knew this was a time bomb waiting to go off because the vast majority of businesses and retailers were running bad wireless LAN security with blatantly weak security. Many businesses refused to fix their security and refuse to this day, through a combination of ignorance and denial. Some businesses and retailers listened and upgraded their security to WPA; others flat-out refused. I actually had one client go the extra mile to buy all-new WPA-capable equipment, only to be told in the end that they would only implement WEP because that was the "standard" their corporate head quarters used.

Getting people to upgrade their security and educate them was hard enough as it was, but the fact that many security professionals and security training courses are still recommending the worst kinds of wireless LAN security exacerbated the situation. I've done my best to spread the word about wireless LAN security, and even published a 10-article Guide to enterprise wireless LAN security, which is basically a free eBook. It is essential that businesses and organizations implement the kind of security I describe in my enterprise guide.

For homes and small home offices, wireless LAN security can be summed up in a single paragraph. All you need to do is use WPA-PSK security with a RANDOM alphanumeric pass-phrase that has a MINIMUM of 10 characters. I estimated that a truly random alphanumeric 10-character WPA-PSK pass-phrase using modern single-core computers will take one thousand PCs working in parallel 500 years to crack. If your hardware doesn't support WPA mode, you can almost always get a free software/firmware upgrade to support it. If the hardware can't be upgraded, businesses can't afford a breach in their data security and they must buy WPA-compliant gear regardless of the cost. Cost shouldn't ever be used as an excuse to have poor security and it won't help you in court when you're getting sued. WPA-compliant access points and wireless cards can be acquired for less than $50 per device.

<Next page - How TJX diverted attention and got help of media>

 

Pages: 1 2

George Ou is Technical Director of ZDNet. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 80 Talkback(s)
Righ on target.
I think Gerge was reading a little to fast. Wired is inheriently more secure than wireless. While I appreciate the concern, that users will here that encryption is usless, That is really not what is... (Read the rest)
Posted by: singerap Posted on: 06/06/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
$1 billion?  Mitch RatcliffeZDNet Moderator | 05/07/07
I'm not reporting that, others are  georgeou | 05/07/07
People like me?  Mitch RatcliffeZDNet Moderator | 05/07/07
You can start with the WSJ article I linked to  georgeou | 05/07/07
So, no responsibility?  nizuse | 05/08/07
Gratuitous hate won't improve your clarity  fuzzy2k | 05/08/07
Chill out, that's an inside joke  georgeou | 05/08/07
Sorry  fuzzy2k | 05/08/07
No problem, I should have sent that in email  georgeou | 05/08/07
He said "could", not "will".....  linux for me | 05/09/07
Shocking  D. T. Schmitz | 05/07/07
I don't know, maybe it is necessary  georgeou | 05/07/07
Just the facts ...  orcmid | 05/07/07
Multi-factor is a scam that falls under "snake oil" in security  georgeou | 05/07/07
Some one tell my bank that as well  nucrash | 05/08/07
No, I'd rather use my own smartcard/keygen  georgeou | 05/08/07
Multi-factor authentication  dancac | 05/08/07
Compounded Cluelessness  orcmid | 05/08/07
Standardised processes may not create high quality  Patanjali | 05/09/07
You're right, consistently low quality  georgeou | 05/09/07
Don't get me started about ISO certification  High Sierra | 05/15/07
I like the thinking, but let's improve shall we  nucrash | 05/08/07
Default insecure is standard  Marty R. Milette | 05/08/07
People have no Idea how un secure our info is  masonfcobb1@... | 05/08/07
Employers are free to use SSNs as identifiers  orcmid | 05/08/07
Figuring out the damages  Larry DignanZDNet Moderator | 05/08/07
The lawsuits and fines will pile up  georgeou | 05/08/07
Why hasnt anyone asked why TJX's External Auditor's never caught this?  TSGlassey | 05/08/07
That's not how auditing works  georgeou | 05/08/07
Uhhhhh - No George - that's exactly how Auditing works...  TSGlassey | 05/10/07
I've seen how auditing works, and I'm not impressed  georgeou | 05/10/07
TJX management bears the responsibility.  micallefman@... | 05/08/07
Heres the problem, SOX doesn't say you can't use WEP  georgeou | 05/08/07
Correct George  micallefman@... | 05/14/07
The costs of the damages may actually never be known...  TSGlassey | 05/08/07
1 Billion should just be the initial fine...  enduser_z | 05/08/07
I agree, $100 per record should be the minimum fine  georgeou | 05/08/07
Sorry, need to fix math  georgeou | 05/08/07
was the cc data itself encrypted?  JetJaguar | 05/08/07
Doesn't matter, they failed Access Control and Host hardening  georgeou | 05/08/07
Failing Host Hardening is another Audit Issue!  TSGlassey | 05/10/07
Their hosts were compromised because their authentication was leaked  georgeou | 05/10/07
The 0th flaw in wireless security  dpnewkirk | 05/08/07
That kind of cynicism is wrong and harmful  georgeou | 05/08/07
Seeing choice when you actually have choice  dpnewkirk | 05/09/07
Righ on target.  singerap | 06/06/07
Yet another reason why retailers should not be allowed to keep CC data.  Been_Done_Before | 05/08/07
Why store the CC numbers anyhow ?  mikew_z | 05/08/07
Sloth, laziness, greed, incompetence, etc.  ejhonda | 05/08/07
Why not?  enduser_z | 05/08/07
Even if they didn't store it, it's still a big problem  georgeou | 05/08/07
WPA questions...?  techboy_z | 05/08/07
In most cases, you can't...  Marty R. Milette | 05/08/07
WPA is for making access points private  orcmid | 05/08/07
Public APs don't have security.  georgeou | 05/08/07
Don't trust your network  Sxooter_z | 05/08/07
That's the wrong attitude for it  georgeou | 05/08/07
You completely missed my point  Sxooter_z | 05/09/07
VPN shouldn't be a substitute for link-layer security  georgeou | 05/09/07
and one more thing  Sxooter_z | 05/09/07
Sorry, that's completely wrong  georgeou | 05/09/07
Last post, honest.  Sxooter_z | 05/09/07
His solution sucks and it's wrong  georgeou | 05/09/07
Such eloquence!  Sxooter_z | 05/09/07
btw  Sxooter_z | 05/09/07
VPN doesn't fix basic access control  georgeou | 05/09/07
Again, you missed his point  Sxooter_z | 05/10/07
absolutely untrue  zoroaster | 05/08/07
oops...  zoroaster | 05/08/07
Uh, if that was a response to "don't trust the network"  Sxooter_z | 05/09/07
Heres a sad truth, law enforcement problem  masonfcobb1@... | 05/08/07
Hm....I agree  Krazyken39 | 05/09/07
it might be that only WEP works  ttocsmij | 05/08/07
Then replace the hardware...  burkhartmic | 05/08/07
WEP is still better than...  burkhartmic | 05/08/07
Your son will figure it out.  gordon@... | 05/09/07
A lot more information on Wireless Security  gordon@... | 05/09/07
Hope they all go bankrupt  High Sierra | 05/15/07
i actually think $1B seems low...  merenguegod@... | 05/15/07
It's the fines and replacement costs  georgeou | 05/30/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

Top Rated

    advertisement

    Archives

    ZDNet Blogs

    White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

    Enterprise Applications

    • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
    • New Online Dashboard
    • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline