On CBS.com: Enter For Chance to Tour Set of MEDUM
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

July 24th, 2007

AMD 690G versus Intel G965 PC shootout

Posted by George Ou @ 3:59 am

Categories: AMD, Apple, Consumer electronics, Desktop, Energy efficiency - green, Fun Stuff, Hardware, Intel, Microsoft, Processors, Servers, Storage, Vista

Tags: Game, Chipset, Result, PC, Power Consumption, Video, Motherboard, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Graphics, Watt

The integrated graphics market is one of the least glamorous platforms in desktop computing, but it is probably one of the most important since 90% of the PC market is dominated by integrated graphics.  Not only is the chipset itself a valuable prize to AMD and Intel, but the chipset also determines which CPU gets put in to the system.  This article will compare AMD’s latest 690G integrated graphics chipset to Intel’s G965 integrated graphics chipset.

The AMD 690G launched back in March 2007 and the Intel G965 is more than a year old with its successor the G35 due later this quarter.  That leads to the question of why bother with this comparison since the Intel G35 is due in a month or two.  The reason I’m doing releasing this now is because there is a lot of contention over which CPU is more energy efficient, which chipset does better at gaming, and which chipset is better at playing back video.  The results of this test will also give us a general idea of what to expect with Intel’s G35 chipset and it also gives much needed coverage for AMD’s integrated graphics chipsets since many people are still under the false impression that AMD doesn’t have a motherboard chipset.

As soon as I can get my hands on a G35 chipset or updated drivers that resolve some of the problems, I will post a follow up to this shootout.  I’ll also be able to quickly test the upcoming energy efficient AMD BE-2350 low-power processors and some of Intel’s newer Core 2 CPUs which have been refined.

Hardware and Software configuration:

AMD 690G platform Intel G965 platform
MSI K9AGM2-FIH motherboard Intel DG965WH motherboard
Size = MicroATX Size = ATX
X2 5600+ 2.8 GHz dual-core CPU E6600 2.4 GHz dual-core CPU
Two 512 MB DDR2-533 DRAM Two 512 MB DDR2-533 DRAM
ATI X1250 integrated graphics Intel GMA 3000 integrated graphics
330 Watt SeaSonic Power Supply 330 Watt SeaSonic Power Supply
Seagate 160 GB SATA 7200 RPM Seagate 160 GB SATA 7200 RPM
Vista x86 32-bit Vista x86 32-bit
ATI Catalyst 7.7 display driver Intel Graphics driver v15.4.3
Default Vista DVD CODEC Default Vista DVD CODEC
Windows Media Player 11 for DVD playback Windows Media Player 11 for DVD playback


Feature and price comparisons

AMD 690G platform Intel G965 platform
MSI K9AGM2-FIH 690G motherboard has integrated HDMI digital video output in addition to VGA analog output.  However, the digital HDMI out isn’t going to fix the terrible video playback quality. Intel DG965WH motherboard lacks built-in HDMI and requires an add-on card.  While the card may only cost $10 or less to large manufacturers and PC makers, end-users who build their own computers will have a hard time finding those SDVO ADD2 add-on boards.  Some of the newer G35-based Motherboards being released this quarter will come with HDMI ports.
The AMD 690G only has 4 SATA ports with RAID 0, 1, and 1+0 support.  Neither of these RAID types are suitable for storage servers but is more than sufficient for most PC users. The Intel G965 motherboard has one of the finest integrated storage RAID controllers on any motherboard.  It has 6 SATA ports that support RAID 0, 1, 1+0, and 5.  Its storage performance numbers are extremely good.
AMD X2 5600+ costs $150 Intel E6550 costs $185 (replacement for E6600 which has FSB1333 and newer manufacturing process)
Low cost motherboard at $70. Modest cost motherboard at $115

<Next page - AMD versus Intel on Energy efficiency>

Pages: 1 2 3 4

George Ou is Technical Director of ZDNet. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 47 Talkback(s)
configuration, Configuration and Configuration
ATI cards has more than one deinterlace mode and the 3-2 pulldown detection is off by dhefault. You can change them the Catalyst Control Center / Avivio Video... (Read the rest)
Posted by: h14350 Posted on: 08/09/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Intel is best for Linux  icheyne | 07/24/07
You're right, but I think AMD and ATI is improving  georgeou | 07/24/07
AMD & Nvidia is the combo to go with  Robert Crocker | 07/24/07
AMD & ATI better for future linux...  Narg | 07/25/07
Good comparison  nucrash | 07/24/07
Neither won, they both need some major improvements  georgeou | 07/24/07
Though Intregrated Rules the market...  nucrash | 07/24/07
True  georgeou | 07/24/07
About power consumption differences  WiredGuy | 07/24/07
Something to consider  nucrash | 07/24/07
Agreed - but the diffeence is so small  WiredGuy | 07/24/07
Sorry to say this, but Intel for low end  nucrash | 07/24/07
Again, that's MicroATX versus ATX  georgeou | 07/24/07
They used a very expensive meter that graphed power versus time  georgeou | 07/24/07
Roughly the same?  justanitguy | 07/25/07
Did you read the rest of the page where AMD used 6 watts more in idle?  georgeou | 07/25/07
Video playback results  jay_tcb | 07/24/07
No version of HQV declares pass or fail  georgeou | 07/24/07
Gotcha, but then why use the screen shots you did?  jay_tcb | 07/25/07
I typed those in for illustration purposes  georgeou | 07/25/07
Now I'm confused  jay_tcb | 07/25/07
I typed in those pass fail words  georgeou | 07/26/07
Here's what I'm confused about  jay_tcb | 07/26/07
Nothing deliberate, just a mistake that I mixed present and past  georgeou | 07/27/07
Integrated graphics is for casual gamers - the solitare players  CobraA1 | 07/24/07
Forget my rant about games - what's with the video?  CobraA1 | 07/24/07
That's what I would like to know  georgeou | 07/25/07
Two Words hold all the answers  nucrash | 07/25/07
Agree in part  Drakaran | 07/25/07
A question I would have  Freebird54 | 07/26/07
$30 video card won't do much better  georgeou | 07/25/07
Aack, you're right - I was looking at a card after rebate  CobraA1 | 07/25/07
I've seen this before...  Narg | 07/25/07
Post your results then, don't just make accusations  georgeou | 07/25/07
integrated graphics is that it is essentially a free video card...  Redsheep | 07/25/07
These boards will all autodisable  georgeou | 07/25/07
George, well written article and well balanced  thetruthhurts | 07/26/07
Testing  yagijd | 07/26/07
Nobody uses x64 because they might have a printer or scanner with no driver  georgeou | 07/26/07
Drivers  yagijd | 07/26/07
Don't make shallow generalizations  georgeou | 07/27/07
Irrevelent Intel Propaganda  vankuvr@... | 07/26/07
Their highend didn't look much better on video  georgeou | 07/26/07
configuration, Configuration and Configuration  h14350 | 08/09/07
It's all about the drivers  abellini117@... | 07/27/07
AMD has 65nm proccesors, you used the 90nm  hen770@... | 07/27/07
This was AMD's choice to use the 90nm  georgeou | 07/27/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

Top Rated

    Archives

    ZDNet Blogs

    White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

    SmartPlanet

    Click Here