On mySimon: ABS Illusion Yoke Sequin Shift Dress
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

August 3rd, 2007

Social Network Dead-Ends

Posted by Mitch Ratcliffe @ 11:23 am

Categories: Business & Technology

Tags: Social Networking, Network, Mitch Ratcliffe

For all the hype of the Summer of Facebook, the direction social networking is headed will lead only to dead ends. A discussion of social networking at the AlwaysOn Stanford Summit the other day demonstrates that, for the most part, social network providers only want to keep their members on the inside of their walled gardens.

Social activity doesn’t exist in narrow parameters, and no one wants to do more to manage their relationships, despite the assertion by Ning cofounder Gina Bianchini that people will want to have to have identities for different [millions of] social networks.” Making socializing into work isn’t how you make it popular. Managing isn’t what makes life fun.

Moreover, making socializing into an activity that enriches others doesn’t add to the attraction of social networks. Consider that if I currently earn Amazon affiliate revenue when I mention books that are purchased through my personal blog, I lose that revenue when I share books using the Visual Bookshelf application in Facebook—the app provider now earns my affiliate revenue.

The whole approach to friending, which typically grants carte blanche access to a person’s information or to a Facebook application provider, treats personal data as though it was the least valuable feature of the social environment. Instead, it is the most precious thing, something that we struggle to share selectively throughout our lives. Simple categories of access to personal information, suggested by social network providers, such as “friend,” “family” and “colleague,” will not suffice, either, because we don’t have uniform relationships with our friends, family members or coworkers.

Here’s the rule of social success: Our personal data shouldn’t become someone else’s asset. Instead, we need to be able to turn it into value for ourselves. Yes, a network provider can claim some of that value for facilitating the interaction, but not all of it.

Social networks as they are conceived today are cul-de-sacs where our personal data goes to die, returning minimal value before it becomes the property of a company or part of the public record.

Mitch RatcliffeMitch Ratcliffe is a veteran journalist, media executive and entrepreneur. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.


Email Mitch Ratcliffe

Subscribe to Rational Rants via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 7 Talkback(s)
some good points
Computerized social networks are still a very young technology. It's great to see
the stuff that has popped up recently with sites like MySpace and Facebook. I think
Mitch, as well as the pe... (Read the rest)
Posted by: justwait Posted on: 08/11/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Too Much Work  ParrotHeadFL | 08/06/07
great article  tubr0 | 08/06/07
Yes, we have lives  ParrotHeadFL | 08/07/07
...and no replacement for community.  TakeIT2 | 08/06/07
Definitely a "Dead End"  danm50 | 08/07/07
It is not a dead end  T1Oracle | 08/08/07
some good points  justwait | 08/11/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement
Click Here

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and