On TV.com: CALIFORNICATION'S Hank Needs to Get Hurt
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

April 10th, 2008

Why Symantec bought Appstream (not)

Posted by Phil Wainewright @ 2:35 pm

Categories: Managed services, On-demand, Rich Internet Applications, Software licensing

Tags: Software-as-a-service, Symantec Corp., AppStream Inc., On-demand, Software As A Service (SaaS), Security, Emerging Technologies, Phil Wainewright

Of course we all know the real reason why Symantec is acquiring AppStream — a move announced yesterday at its user conference in Las Vegas. Virtualization is hot and Symantec is big in systems management. AppStream helps round out its offerings for packaging and streaming virtualized software. It’s as simple as that.

symantec logoJust for a moment, though, let’s imagine Symantec is following a much broader vision — one that positions it to wrest control of the on-demand desktop from right under Microsoft’s nose. I know this is the stuff of fantasy — it could only happen if Symantec were serious about SaaS. Sadly, Symantec’s track record on this score is lamentable.

A year ago at SaaScon 2007, the company proudly unveiled its overarching strategy for capturing the SMB market for SaaS with the announcement of … an online backup service. For a moment there, I thought I’d been transported back to 1998 and the early days of application service providers. There was talk at the time, admittedly, of this being just the first in a portfolio of SaaS offerings, and indeed, the range today also includes online archiving. But at a dollar-a-month per GB — more than six times the price of storage at Amazon S3 — it’s hardly going to set the world on fire.

It would be much more exciting to round out the offering with, say, pay-as-you-go hosted Microsoft Office, delivered as a service for a low monthly subscription. An Appstream partner in the UK, Fasthosts, introduced such a service in February and, despite some initial squeals of protest from Microsoft, is still selling it today — with a bargain-basement starting price of £5 (around $10) per user per month.

Granted, such offerings still reek of ASP-dom, even though it would spark a few interesting headlines were a company the size of Symantec were to start offering MS Office on the same model as Fasthosts’ more limited experiment. But where this desktop streaming capability becomes especially strategic is the potential to deliver any client-side application as a cloud-managed service. I discussed this upside when I first wrote about AppStream last March:

“… solutions like AppStream could become a saving grace for the future of SaaS in which ever-richer functionality, as well as cached data, is downloaded and stored on the client. So long as it’s managed from the network and the user doesn’t have to tangle with the technology, that seems like a neat compromise to me. Indeed, it could even mean that I could log into and use any PC or other device wherever in the world I sat down in front of one, and I could have my apps and data streamed down to me just for that session.”

This kind of serviced client concept is one that I first ascribed to Symantec back in early 2006 when it unveiled plans for a product codenamed Genesis — and which at the time I felt would help position it to battle Microsoft for control of the on-demand desktop. In its final guise as Norton 360, however, Genesis hasn’t lived up to its early billing as a fully on-demand offering.

Indeed, it’s clear from looking back over the past couple of years that Symantec has consistently dropped the ball on SaaS. That’s why I’m confident its acquisition of Appstream — despite the undoubted potential — won’t in the end have any great impact on the SaaS world, either.

Phil WainewrightPhil Wainewright is a commentator and strategist on emerging software industry trends. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.


Email Phil Wainewright

Subscribe to Software as Services via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 6 Talkback(s)
Uhm....
The point is, just in case you don't know, that the Application runs on the Client.

Beyond that it's a (not so) basic question of various competing things as to where you put the processing pow... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Keith Mallen Posted on: 04/14/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
WGA has made all these 3rd party guys obsolete!  Ballmer1 | 04/10/08
are you kidding me  dirtfarmer | 04/11/08
RE: Why Symantec bought Appstream (not)  fujifilm9 | 04/12/08
Uhm....  Keith Mallen | 04/14/08
I'm not sure  Keith Mallen | 04/12/08
Here we go....  Keith Mallen | 04/13/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here