On CBS MoneyWatch: Deal or no deal? 8 lousy 'bargains'
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

July 23rd, 2008

PaaS embraces client access licensing

Posted by Phil Wainewright @ 5:37 am

Categories: Business models, Platform as a service, Software licensing

Tags: Software-as-a-service, Enterprise Software, PaaS, Extranet, Coghead, Software As A Service (SaaS), Cloud Computing, Business Services, Pricing, Emerging Technologies

Back in the early days of application service providers (ASPs, the doomed precursors of SaaS), software licensing was a huge barrier to growth, simply because conventional enterprise software licenses assume you already know who all your users are going to be, and expect you to pay up front for all of them. Enterprises encountered similar problems with their early extranet deployments. The licensing that vendors offered simply didn’t cater to the new opportunities opened up by the Web.

Platform as a service (PaaS), which provides hosted infrastructure for developing and deploying custom SaaS applications, is now going through the same rite of passage. Yesterday, Coghead became the latest PaaS vendor to introduce a subscription that recognizes a separate class of casual or less frequent user. Until yesterday, the price per logged-in user was around $10 per month. Now Coghead has added the option of an unlimited user subscription (confusingly named the ‘Limited User’ option) for an additional $50, which allows any number of either anonymous or authenticated users to access the application via specified access points (eg a widget or an API).

The approach is different from that taken by Bungee Labs, another PaaS provider, which charges according to the actual compute resources used. As I mentioned when I discussed this in April, Bungee’s approach can lead to jaw-droppingly low costs for occasional users, but it does have the disadvantage of being less predictable than Coghead’s approach. Paul McNamara, Coghead’s CEO, told me last week that a utility pricing scheme had been rejected because of this uncertainty: customers “don’t want this to be like cellphone bills in the 1990s.” On the other hand, the fixed pricing means that Coghead has to somehow put caps on usage “in case someone wants to create a YouTube on Coghead,” as McNamara told me.

Phil WainewrightPhil Wainewright is a commentator and strategist on emerging software industry trends. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.


Email Phil Wainewright

Subscribe to Software as Services via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 5 Talkback(s)
RE: PaaS embraces client access licensing
Amy?s right, businesses buy the application, not the platform. Any ISV needs to have a flexible licensing and billing model that they can change on a dime, based on their customers? changing needs. We... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Shel Symonds Posted on: 07/24/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
At least they offer SSL  mr1972 | 07/23/08
RE: PaaS embraces client access licensing  Yves Hiernaux | 07/23/08
Customer-friendly pricing  phil wainewrightZDNet Moderator | 07/24/08
It's the Combination of PaaS and SaaS Pricing that Counts  amywohl | 07/24/08
RE: PaaS embraces client access licensing  Shel Symonds | 07/24/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More