On BNET: 5 classic computer pranks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

November 9th, 2005

The incumbent's conundrum

Posted by Phil Wainewright @ 1:56 am

Categories: Microsoft

Tags:

Clayton Christensen’s book The Innovator’s Dilemma explains in detail why established market leaders get caught out by disruptive innovations. What you might call the incumbent’s conundrum is knowing when to flip from supporting your existing successful products to investing in the technologies that will one day make them obsolete.

Most incumbents get this completely wrong. Microsoft has now become the latest example, as its own CTO Ray Ozzie let slip in an internal memo he recently sent to Microsoft employees:

"We should’ve been leaders with all our web properties in harnessing the potential of Ajax, following our pioneering work in OWA (Outlook Web Access)."

Should’ve, but didn’t. At the time, Microsoft was intent on making sure that as few as possible users deserted the desktop environment in favor of web-based applications. Following up that "pioneering work" would have directly contradicted company strategy. Microsoft had no incentive to do anything that would hasten a switch to web-based interfaces — which is why it ignored a succession of insiders who tried to argue the case. The trouble is, other companies had no such incentive, and Microsoft has ended up following them rather than leading.

Now that Microsoft has got itself on the back foot, things will go from bad to worse for the software giant, I’m afraid. With no track record of serious investment in web-centric business models, the company has no pool of internal expertise in that area that it can draw on. That means its efforts to regain lost ground will continue to be stymied, while it will continue to waste money and resources attempting to defend its established products in areas where they have already lost the initiative (for example, attempting to supplant PDF as a format for document exchange).

Microsoft’s decline will be much like IBM’s from 1985-1995, when Microsoft itself was the principal agent of disruption. You’d think, given that experience, Microsoft would know better, but maybe no company is strong enough to battle its own incumbency.

Phil WainewrightPhil Wainewright is a commentator and strategist on emerging software industry trends. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.


Email Phil Wainewright

Subscribe to Software as Services via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 32 Talkback(s)
Push Too Early
Push had the right idea at the wrong time. Trying to push out whole apps on a 10Mps node was, well, stupid. The problem was bandwidth. Now that virtually everyone has a broadband connection at home, a... (Read the rest)
Posted by: clarence45_20@... Posted on: 11/17/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
You are ASSuming  Roger Ramjet | 11/09/05
You could be right  ebrke | 11/09/05
Remember when "Push" was the next big thing?  archerjoe | 11/09/05
Push Too Early  clarence45_20@... | 11/17/05
Microsoft reinvents itself every 5 years  DonDodge | 11/09/05
Common tactic?  IT_User | 11/10/05
don't think so!  Power User | 11/10/05
Specifically,  michael_t | 11/10/05
and you missed out xbox  f3773t | 11/10/05
I'll take that bet...  Chad_z | 11/17/05
Yes, bad to worse: here's why  phil wainewrightZDNet Moderator | 11/09/05
Yes, bad to worse: here's why (take 2)  phil wainewrightZDNet Moderator | 11/09/05
Continuous innovation is what counts  DonDodge | 11/09/05
I need applications that work, not innovation  Justin James | 11/09/05
Old Skool thoughts  tombalablomba | 11/11/05
"Innovation" != "Progress"  Justin James | 11/11/05
If george jumps of a bridge, do you?  tombalablomba | 11/13/05
Requirements are already met  techboy_z | 11/10/05
One more on the list...  Anton Philidor | 11/11/05
That's interesting  rapson | 11/10/05
Oh please  BFD | 11/10/05
An accident waiting to happen  Reged | 11/10/05
... and all cleaned up  Reged | 11/10/05
Horse puckey. You're leaving out the greatest equalizer in all of this.  Nobody_really | 11/10/05
Oh please, pundits have made this claim for a decade...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/05
Nobody believed them when they predicted IBM's downfall either.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 11/10/05
Congratulation on your high ranking ....  Reverend MacFellow | 11/11/05
I'm Not Convinced  P. Douglas | 11/10/05
XAML?  tombalablomba | 11/11/05
The Great Follower  educationtalk | 11/11/05
The incumbent's other conundrum  jbroche18 | 11/11/05
Buy innovation  eslorence@... | 11/12/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More