On CNET: Sony still losing on every PS3 it sells
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

August 17th, 2006

Adobe, Linux and DRM

Posted by Ryan Stewart @ 9:40 pm

Categories: Adobe, Flash, Linux, Rich Internet Applications

Tags:

linux_flash.jpgMy fellow ZDNet blogger, David Berlind, has a great post titled The skinny on desktop Linux pros, cons and adoption where he does a good job of spelling out what is hindering Linux as a widely accepted solution and what the future for Linux holds. As David notes, there is a groundswell of Linux adoption across the world, but what is really keeping Linux from the mainstream is the fact that it doesn’t support the DRMed media that the world has become accustomed to.

If Adobe threw its full weight behind Linux, it could make the operating system relevant on the desktopDavid’s post is rather timely because I was just talking with someone today about Adobe software on Linux. I have made no secret that I think Adobe has a lot of potential if they embrace Linux. However David brings up the Digital Rights Management (DRM) issue which is where I think Adobe and Linux users should really be cooperating. David is absolutely correct when he says that one of the major shortcomings of Linux is its inability to handle multimedia. Scoble is also correct when he says that Linux has horrible, horrible fonts. These are two things that Flash could improve immensely if Linux users bought into Adobe’s platform.

Let me be clear. If Adobe threw its full weight behind Linux, it could make the operating system relevant on the desktop. I realize the boldness of the statement, but I’m willing to explain. I want to also be clear that at this stage in the game, it makes no sense for Microsoft to support Linux. There aren’t enough users, Linux is still a threat, and despite the value in a cross-platform solution, it doesn’t jive with Microsoft’s strategy. Now, Adobe is a different story, but there are some hurdles they need to overcome.

The first is DRM. Right now Flash has no DRM. This is both very good, and very bad. It is good because most DRM solutions are implemented very badly. It is a pain to users, especially ones that just want to own the content they pay for. It is bad because the Flash platform has a lot of potential when it comes to multimedia. Video, Audio, everything just works on Flash, regardless of the platform. Think about what iTunes is. It’s a music store and a music player. Why couldn’t that be implemented in Flash? Why couldn’t Flash have a DRM system that allowed you to buy music or video, play it via the Flash Player, on any device you own that runs Flash. Windows? Mac? Linux? PSP? Doesn’t matter, as long as it runs Flash, the DRM works and your stuff plays. If Adobe were to implement DRM well, then instantly Linux has a DRM solution that can handle all types of media.

Linux has some very solid tools, but they are built by geeks, for geeks. That won’t fly with the mainstream.Flash is all about providing experiences. It is a great RIA tool because you can build very rich applications that run anywhere. Linux has some very solid tools, but they are built by geeks, for geeks. That won’t fly with the mainstream. Scoble speaks for a lot of people when he says "What keeps me from using Linux? Three things: readability. Fonts. Aesthetics." With Flash, you can build applications that give you the same type of experience you would have on a Mac, but it runs everywhere. You aren’t bound by the operating system you use because the core experience lies within the applications. With Flash (and DRM) the designers and developers who work so hard have a way to monetize their work. Those who want to give it away for free in true Web 2.0 spirit are more than able to.

Again, I realize that all of these things take time, and to be blunt, throwing a lot of support at Linux isn’t in Adobe’s best business interest right now. There is a lot of risk for very little definitive gain. But they are making sure to bring Flash Player 9 to Linux, and that’s the first step. If they can solve the DRM problem, and make sure that is available for Linux, then little by little Linux gets a platform that behaves like the rest of the world. If pushing Linux adoption is important to the community, then Linux needs to embrace Flash. If they do, then Adobe can help them.

Ryan StewartRyan Stewart, a Rich Internet Application developer and industry analyst, recently joined Adobe's Platform Team as a Rich Internet Application Evangelist. full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Ryan Stewart

Subscribe to The Universal Desktop via Email alerts or RSS.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 45 Talkback(s)
You sure can't read
First off Apple devised Fair Play because Microsoft would not license Plays For Sure to Apple. Microsoft stopped making WMP at v. 8 and will only license the codecs to v 9. There will be no order fo... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Edward Meyers Posted on: 08/20/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
GPL  JulesLt | 08/18/06
RE: GPL  ryanstewart | 08/18/06
The GPL is a minor problem...  bportlock | 08/18/06
Oh Well...  LazLong | 08/18/06
a warning sign?  TakeIT2 | 08/18/06
RE: a warning sign?  ryanstewart | 08/18/06
RE: a warning sign? (better formatting)  ryanstewart | 08/18/06
RE: a warning sign? (one more time)  ryanstewart | 08/18/06
Etcetera abbreviated is etc  jsharsky-3@... | 08/18/06
\r\n problems on linux?  jsharsky-3@... | 08/18/06
RE: a warning sign? (one more time) Pay Up Sucker!  TakeIT2 | 08/18/06
DRM  zoroaster | 08/18/06
I wonder how much cr*p people will put up with ...  bportlock | 08/18/06
RE: I wonder how much cr*p people will put up with ...  ryanstewart | 08/18/06
RE: DRM  ryanstewart | 08/18/06
Linux doesn't Need Flash (Adobe)  D-T-Schmitz | 08/18/06
RE: Linux doesn't Need Flash (Adobe)  ryanstewart | 08/18/06
Linux doesn't Need Adobe  fabior | 08/18/06
Linux has the same problem  ordaj@... | 08/18/06
RE: Linux has the same problem  ryanstewart | 08/18/06
Really only 3 or 4  LazLong | 08/18/06
I see no advantage to Flash implementing DRM  P. Douglas | 08/18/06
Re: I see no advantage to Flash implementing DRM  TakeIT2 | 08/18/06
3rd time was the charm  TakeIT2 | 08/18/06
Flash  Edward Meyers | 08/18/06
RE: Flash  ryanstewart | 08/18/06
Some linux users already have taken it up  Edward Meyers | 08/18/06
DRM is not the main point !  fabior | 08/18/06
RE: DRM is not the main point !  ryanstewart | 08/18/06
Novell pools  fabior | 08/18/06
You didn't look very hard......  linux for me | 08/19/06
On Graphics  Edward Meyers | 08/19/06
Photoshop  30otsix | 08/18/06
Photoshop  cresquin | 08/18/06
Perhaps I misstated the point  30otsix | 08/18/06
Photoshop Again  fabior | 08/18/06
Pantone inks  jplatt39 | 08/18/06
That, and....  jgmsys@... | 08/18/06
DRM Nightmare for Linux  Ratteler | 08/18/06
What's the driver for widespread adoption?  Chad_z | 08/18/06
Since when did the world get used to the DRMed media?  blahblah22 | 08/18/06
Who implements DRM?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/19/06
Open DRM Schemes  Edward Meyers | 08/19/06
Who's in charge?  Anton Philidor | 08/19/06
You sure can't read  Edward Meyers | 08/20/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Top Rated

    advertisement

    Archives

    ZDNet Blogs

    White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

    SmartPlanet

    Click Here