<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
    <title>A Developer's View</title>
    <link>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
    <language>en</language>
            <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/zdnet/carroll" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
        <title>Curing what ails Microsoft</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~3/365830339/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1868#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>John Carroll</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1868</guid>
        <description>Microsoft's biggest problem lies in its inability to maintain consistency across product categories, both from a user interface standpoint, and increasingly, from an API and technology standpoint.  What Microsoft needs is more sharing within Microsoft combined with a more concerted effort from the center to impose discipline, from an API and user interface standpoint, across its product lines.&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
  &lt;img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=7fd0f9e2cecb12a61b74bc4db9273d09" height="1" width="1"/&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=7fd0f9e2cecb12a61b74bc4db9273d09" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~4/365830339" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1868</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1868</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>Countering an Apple-favoring .NET critic</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~3/364872414/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1867#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>John Carroll</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1867</guid>
        <description>I've been investigating Apple Cocoa API as I plan to complement my Windows and UNIX development skills with skills in Mac development.  That doesn't mean I am willing to accept weak attacks what I consider to be a superior development platform:  .NET.&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
      &lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=301ab5e2316c621e2b04eb4e51d57d19"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=301ab5e2316c621e2b04eb4e51d57d19"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
  &lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=301ab5e2316c621e2b04eb4e51d57d19" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~4/364872414" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1867</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1867</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>Linux, user interfaces and copying Apple</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~3/363116842/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1866#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>John Carroll</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1866</guid>
        <description>Bob Sutor of IBM thinks that Linux needs to make innovative user interfaces, pointing to Apple as proof that charting your own path is beneficial.  Apple, however, has certain aspects of its business that simply do not apply to Linux, making it harder for the business-focused operating system to achieve much market traction with a trend-breaking user interface.&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
  &lt;img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=42e7d7ef54246108d4e1ef53f46f65bc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=42e7d7ef54246108d4e1ef53f46f65bc" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~4/363116842" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1866</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1866</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>DVB-H and government overreach</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~3/359547150/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1865#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>John Carroll</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Wired &#038; Wireless]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1865</guid>
        <description>Germany is facing difficulties finding a workable business model for the mandatory DVB-H mobile video broadcasting standard.  Perhaps the problem is that governments are trying to impose technology standards ahead of time -- a strategy that, from an economics standpoint, is questionable.&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
  &lt;img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=ac36f746fd638781a50143aa3679362c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=ac36f746fd638781a50143aa3679362c" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~4/359547150" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1865</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1865</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>The Microsoft middle ground</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~3/358565669/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1864#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>John Carroll</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1864</guid>
        <description>Microsoft occupies a middle ground between the vertically-integrated control of an Apple and the bazaar-like atmosphere of the open source world.  Microsoft abandons that middle ground at their own peril.&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
      &lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=2fc55390e67951ecc961c8e678fd9c9a"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=2fc55390e67951ecc961c8e678fd9c9a"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
  &lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=2fc55390e67951ecc961c8e678fd9c9a" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~4/358565669" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1864</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1864</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>Should Microsoft become more Apple-like?</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~3/355476751/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1863#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>John Carroll</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Zune]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1863</guid>
        <description>About a week and a half ago, Mary Jo Foley wrote a piece where she argued that Microsoft was planning to get more &amp;#8220;Apple-like&amp;#8221; in the PC and phone space, based on various statements from Microsoft executives. I intended to write a response that following Monday, but work intervened, which is all for the better, [...]&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
  &lt;img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=cc2ca596820880c6331290144a300195" height="1" width="1"/&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=cc2ca596820880c6331290144a300195" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~4/355476751" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1863</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1863</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>Source code and managed runtimes</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~3/351765621/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1862#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>John Carroll</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1862</guid>
        <description>Managed runtimes and self-describing code has changed Microsoft's approach to source code protection.  We have access to more Microsoft source code than ever before, and that is likely to remain the case so long as Microsoft emphasizes .NET as its platform of the future.&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
  &lt;img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=385914e63f712623ddbc772a46cb14da" height="1" width="1"/&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=385914e63f712623ddbc772a46cb14da" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~4/351765621" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1862</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1862</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>The LA earthquake</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~3/351002192/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1861#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>John Carroll</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1861</guid>
        <description>The quake in Los Angeles wasn't that big a deal, proof of which comes from the fact that, within an hour, I fired up my webcam and posted my thoughts, in video form, to CNN.  Don't you just love the Internet?&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
      &lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=f04364ad6ac067996bb7f167b5dbdca4"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=f04364ad6ac067996bb7f167b5dbdca4"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
  &lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=f04364ad6ac067996bb7f167b5dbdca4" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~4/351002192" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1861</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1861</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>Government, markets and regulation</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~3/344806303/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1860#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>John Carroll</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Policy]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1860</guid>
        <description>Problems in the housing market in the United States provide some interesting lessons about government regulation in general, lessons that have equal applicability to the intersection between Information Technology and government.&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
  &lt;img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=8e76d6d7a5abbaf705a78f59ceb0747e" height="1" width="1"/&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=8e76d6d7a5abbaf705a78f59ceb0747e" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~4/344806303" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1860</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1860</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
        <title>Free the XBOX 360!!!</title>
        <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~3/343713983/</link>
        <comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1859#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>John Carroll</dc:creator>
        
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[XBOX]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[XBOX 360]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wii]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1859</guid>
        <description>It's good that Microsoft has begun to allow home users to create XBOX 360 games that they can sell through XBOX Live.  Microsoft, however, could do so much more with their TV-attached creation if only they were willing to let third parties take it beyond traditional TV-oriented services.&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
  &lt;img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=d7e8243112b45da6ef15c142feada148" height="1" width="1"/&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=d7e8243112b45da6ef15c142feada148" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/carroll/~4/343713983" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1859</wfw:commentRss>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/carroll/?p=1859</feedburner:origLink></item>
    </channel>
</rss>
