On TV.com: Who's Absent From LOST's Final Season?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

April 8th, 2009

Gmail for iPhone, Android: Updated and lookin' good

Posted by Jennifer Bergen @ 3:00 am

Categories: Apple, Google, iPhone 3G, iPhone original, iPod touch

Tags: Message, Apple iPhone, Google Gmail, Mobile, Labels, E-mail Providers, Cloud Computing, E-mail, Internet, Online Communications

Google announced an updated version of Gmail for iPhone and Android-powered phones on Tuesday in the official Gmail blog. The new version is not a standalone app; it simply runs in your Web browser — and quite speedily, might I add. That being said, Google has introduced many new features that will surely make any Gmail user happy.

If you’ve ever been checking your e-mail on your phone, and have lost service, it might be frustrating to be unable to view the message you were just reading, or the directions to a party you had saved in your e-mail. The new Gmail for mobile allows you to open recently read messages and write e-mail even with no connection.

“You’ll notice that it’s a lot faster when performing actions like opening an e-mail, navigating, or searching. And if the data network drops out on you…, you’ll still be able to open recently read messages and to compose over a flaky, or non-existent, network connection,” said Google mobile engineer Joanne McKinley in a blog post.

One of the largest improvements is a new floating toolbar, or “floaty bar.” Gone are the days when you had to select a message, and then scroll all the way up to archive it. When you select a message, a floaty bar shows up near the top of the screen and gives you options to delete, or archive the message. You also can choose “more,” which lets you mark the message as read or unread, add or remove a star, or report spam.

The way you see the actual message, AKA the appearance, has also been revamped. Labels are now easier to read and look more like the labels you see in your computer’s Gmail.

Gmail for mobile only supports iPhone and iPod touch OS 2.2.1 or above. All Android-powered phones are supported. New features and improvements will continue to be added. Go to gmail.com from your mobile browser to try the new version.

Jennifer BergenJennifer R. Bergen is a journalist and blogger living in New York City. See her full profile and disclosure of her industry affiliations.


Email Jennifer Bergen

Subscribe to The ToyBox via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 47 Talkback(s)
I agree - Won't use it on iPhone
Particularly once we get global search and cut/paste in version 3.0 of iPhone software, there really is no reason to use it on the iPhone. In fact, the web browser based email loses all of the OS inte... (Read the rest)
Posted by: BillDem Posted on: 04/09/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
RE: Gmail for iPhone, Android: Updated and lookin' good  Geuseppi | 04/08/09
Same from the Android side...  mrlinux | 04/08/09
The only thing they need to add....  storm14k | 04/08/09
There are severe deficiencies with the GMail app in Android  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
Tried it today  oncall | 04/08/09
I agree - Won't use it on iPhone  BillDem | 04/09/09
I thought the days of coding to a browser were gone?  NonZealot | 04/08/09
Coding to what browser?  storm14k | 04/08/09
How does it know to exclude other browsers?  NonZealot | 04/08/09
It's simple:  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
Yes, I understand technically how it is done  NonZealot | 04/08/09
3 cheers  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
Bzzt, you fail multiple times, again  NonZealot | 04/08/09
You're not coding to the browser so much  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
The web is resolution dependent now?  NonZealot | 04/08/09
Yes it is resolution dependant  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
You truly don't get it  NonZealot | 04/08/09
Why do you find that unacceptable?  oncall | 04/08/09
So it is okay to tailor a site for the marketshare leading product?  NonZealot | 04/08/09
@NZ  oncall | 04/08/09
@oncall: Wow, I totally agreed with your post!!  NonZealot | 04/08/09
@sirtrollsalot  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
@adhominem attacker  NonZealot | 04/08/09
Actually I get it but obviously you don't, troll  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
You prove you don't get it  NonZealot | 04/08/09
@sirtrollsalot  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
@adhominem attacker thus proving he's lost the argument  NonZealot | 04/08/09
If the original site works best for you  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
Don't have those links on Opera  NonZealot | 04/08/09
I see what you're driving at now  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
Changing user agent worked  NonZealot | 04/08/09
The issue is with Google, not Apple  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
And BTW  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
Troll  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
Ever heard of web standards?  techconc | 04/08/09
Ever heard of web standards?  techconc | 04/08/09
What is the difference between these 2 statements  NonZealot | 04/08/09
Wow... Iris Browser got 100/100  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
Why is it too bad?  NonZealot | 04/08/09
What I am especially curious about  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
Fair question, I'll check it out (nt)  NonZealot | 04/08/09
It is looking for webkit  NonZealot | 04/08/09
@NZ... don't jump to conclusions yet  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
@NZ about Agent Strings...  techconc | 04/08/09
@techconc: I tested Opera with spoofed user agent  NonZealot | 04/08/09
Strawman argument...  techconc | 04/08/09
As above  NonZealot | 04/08/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads