On TechRepublic: 10 dying IT skills
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 5th, 2008

Fuel cell breakthrough? Gentlemen, start your engines...

Posted by Harry Fuller @ 5:02 pm

Categories: Blogroll, Europe, air pollution, biofuel, cars & traffic, conservation, energy, engineering, environmental health, fossil fuel, green tech, petroleum, renewable energy, research

Tags: Fuel Cell, Methanol, Catalyst, Methanoliacs, Fuel Cells, Emerging Technologies, Harry Fuller

“Since 1965, methanol has been the only racing fuel used by the Indianapolis 500. Methanol also is an ideal hydrogen carrier fuel for fuel cell technology applications.” That’s a direct quote from the Methanol Institute website. Now how’d you like to have that under the hood of your old beater?

Methanol, known commonly as wood alcohol, can be made from almost any raw material that contains carbon. The production process requires a catalyst. The Methanoliacs’ website says it requires nickel. That’s not so bad. Nickel being relatively inexpensive.

But the catalytic needs don’t end there. Using methanol in fuel cells to produce electricity requires a second catalyst. In the past this has been platinum. And that precious metal makes gold look cheap. Prices now are over $1900 per ounce.

Now comes some research from Europe that promises an even more efficient catalytic process using cheaper materials. The need for platinum is not eliminated but greatly reduced. And it is more than just the composition of the platinum allow that the research deals with. Says a summary report, it is the actual form of the platinum crystals: “if the platinum alloy is structured amorphously, its electrical conduction properties are enhanced and it undergoes less corrosion (advantages for the medium in which it has to operate). Moreover, it has an operational capacity in the order of 80-100 times greater than platinum in a crystalline structure. Amorphous materials are those with a disordered molecular structure.”

This will NOT lower the price of the platinum, of course, but it means far more economical catalysts can be made far more efficient. Perhaps a truly significant step toward realizing the long-awaited promise of widely useful fuel cells.

Harry FullerA newsman since 1969, Harry Fuller has worked for CBS, ABC, CNBC Europe, CNET and was founding news director at TechTV. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Harry Fuller

Subscribe to GreenTech Pastures via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 8 Talkback(s)
Methanol vs Ethanol at Indy
Methanol was nasty stuff. It burns the skin -- remember Robbie Gordon bailing out of his car a few years ago and rolling on the ground? That was methanol, burning his skin while not on fire. If you... (Read the rest)
Posted by: geek49203_z Posted on: 05/22/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Here's a better idea  frgough | 05/06/08
Here's a better idea  OrsonX | 05/06/08
Platinum????!!!!!?!?!!!  Hameiri | 05/06/08
Using food to make fuel is morally wrong.  People | 05/07/08
I agree, this isn't ethanol though.  TripleII | 05/07/08
Not disagreeing  jcrew77 | 05/08/08
Correct. I don't know what I was thinking. (nt)  People | 05/07/08
Methanol vs Ethanol at Indy  geek49203_z | 05/22/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads