On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 21st, 2008

Just as old media once berated and belittled the Internet as a silly fad, now too with cleantech

Posted by Harry Fuller @ 4:02 pm

Categories: Blogroll, air pollution, biofuel, cars & traffic, climate change, energy, federal government, fossil fuel, green tech, petroleum, renewable energy, venture capital

Tags: Food, Biofuel, Business, Clean Technology, Fossil Fuel, Internet, Food & Beverage, Manufacturing, Harry Fuller

That venerable pillar of old, very established business, the Wall Street Journal has gone public with the bitter resentment of old business and fossil fuel for those upstarts who are trying to shift the business model. The editorial attacking VC Vinod Khosla is just one volley in what will become a harsh economic battle for dominance of the world’s enormous energy markets.

That business paper, let us recall it is owned by Rupert Murdoch, accused Khosla of lobbying for corn-ethanol subsidies. That is exactly 180-degrees away from Khosla’s actual statements, of course. Why the mud-slinging? Could it be Khosla’s brash prediction that within five years biofuels, not made from food products, will cost less than fossil fuels? Do the bastions of the status quo really fear Exxon and Chevron will go broke anytime soon, taking their profits and ad dollars with them? Anybody knows that the oil guys could own biofuels, too, if they cared to try, they already have the zillion service stations to distribute from. And I hear they make a tiny profit they could re-invest. Duh. But as with many old-line, hugely profitable businesses, they won’t deign to invest in the next wave. Just like magazine and TV corporations were largely run down by Internet start-ups.

Khosla seems unabashed by the attack from on-high, as the WSJ must picture itself. After all, they’ve been the voice of the mainstream investment community for decades. Last night he was at it again: Khosla talking about the bright future and strong potential for biofuel from waste products and new bio-stock. And how it can change the old way of doing business. He’s really saying Exxon could be the next Kodak or Polaroid or morning newspaper if they don’t get with it. Oh maybe that’s it, the WSJ is a little sensitive about the dwindling newspaper business, felled by digital technology where Khosla made his first billions.

Harry FullerA newsman since 1969, Harry Fuller has worked for CBS, ABC, CNBC Europe, CNET and was founding news director at TechTV. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Harry Fuller

Subscribe to GreenTech Pastures via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 6 Talkback(s)
NAIVE? ABOUT BIG OIL?
The big, highly profitabe companies do NOT want the business paradigm to change. Those fossil fuel companies have no interest in seeing biofuel work or nuclear become more widspread or wind, or whate... (Read the rest)
Posted by: atowhee Posted on: 05/23/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Oil vs Bio, etc.  dancac | 05/22/08
they are, but...  kckn4fun | 05/22/08
NAIVE? ABOUT BIG OIL?  atowhee | 05/23/08
And this has what to do with computers?  Vesicant | 05/22/08
Righty Boy here  geek49203_z | 05/22/08
Just an editorial  coffeeshark | 05/23/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here