On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

September 28th, 2007

Chevron fuels debate over conservation, alternative energy

Posted by Heather Clancy @ 10:16 am

Categories: Blogroll, conservation, energy, fossil fuel, petroleum, renewable energy, solar, water, wind

Tags: Alternative Energy, Chevron Corp., Research & Development, Business Operations, Heather Clancy

I’ll be the first to admit, much to the detriment of my profession, that I don’t usually look at the advertising in print magazines. But a splash spread by Chevron in The Week caught my eye.

The ad was for a Web site Chevron has started at www.willyoujoinus.com. I decided to blog about it briefly, despite a brief internal moral dilemma about whether or not an oil company could really be an unbiased source about alternative energy. In short, it can’t. Unless it’s willing to consider those alternatives itself.

Basically, the site aggregates various stats about the state of global climate change, resource needs and various energy options. They’ve created an interactive game called Energyville, in conjunction with The Economist Group, that lets you choose different energy sources for a fictional city. It provides you with feedback on the economic or environmental impact of those various choices. It also introduces the idea that your city will suffer several acts of energy terrorism (fodder for an internally separate blog entry).

The bottom line, from Chevron’s point of view, is that your city will need petroleum to survive. It lets you choose from many different energy options (including biomass, wind, solar, hydrogen and others), but advises against some of them for various reasons. Mostly to do with cost.

Apparently the site is part of Chevron’s big ad campaign being launched today called “The Power of Human Energy,” which is intended to get more of the public thinking about energy issues and conservation/consumption habits.

Generally speaking, I applaud the company for fueling the debate. (Pun intended.) But I shudder to think of how much it is spending and can’t help wondering whether it might not be more useful to put that money toward research and development investments in alternative energy sources.

Heather ClancyHeather Clancy is an award-winning business journalist in the New York area with more than 20 years experience covering the high-tech industry. See her full profile and disclosure of her industry affiliations. See her full profile and disclosure of her industry affiliations.

Email Heather Clancy

Subscribe to GreenTech Pastures via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 2 Talkback(s)
I see the Oil companies are using
similar tactics to the cigarette companies... before they were finally beaten by dedicated doctors and lobbyist's. I am sorry but I cannot agree with Chevron or any other major oil corporation. They a... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Linux User 147560 Posted on: 09/28/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
energy conservation  ncoltun@... | 09/28/07
I see the Oil companies are using  Linux User 147560 | 09/28/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads