On MovieTome: 10 Awesome Alien Movies
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 24th, 2009

Twenty years after major eco-disaster: not fully recovered

Posted by Harry Fuller @ 11:48 am

Categories: Blogroll, conservation, environmental health, fossil fuel, green tech, law & politics, ocean, petroleum, research, state government, tidal, water

Tags: Exxon Mobil Corp., Trustee Council, Web Site Development, Internet, Harry Fuller

It’s been twenty years since the Exxon Valdez dumped 40 million litres in Port William Sound (PWS), Alaska. Just now Exxon is finally paying out its fines to the residents of the area.

As long as much of the world in dependent on oil, we wil continue to have oil spills. We’ve learned a lot about clean-up and long-term effects. We now know about how to use microbes to bio-degrade the crude oil.

Here’s the website of the trustee council handling the disbursal of money from Exxon and work to monitor and work on continuing clean-up.
Exxon, BTW, has spent close to $3 billion in clean-up and reparation payments. Wanna bet who footed the bill for that? Every time you fill ‘er up, you’re subsidizing the spill costs.

The trustee council has issued a 20-year report, “the area has not fully recovered. In some areas, Exxon Valdez oil still remains and is toxic. Some injured species have yet to recover to pre-spill levels. This long-term damage was not expected at the time of the spill.”

NOTHING BAD GOES AWAY QUICKLY

The report continues, “This Exxon Valdez oil is decreasing at a rate of 0-4% per year, with only a 5% chance that the rate is as high as 4%. At this rate, the remaining oil will take decades and possibly centuries to disappear entirely.

“The amount of Exxon Valdez oil remaining substantially exceeds the sum total of all previous oil pollution on beaches in PWS, including oil spilled during the 1964 earthquake…”

“Following the oil and its impacts over the past 20 years has changed our understanding of the long-term damage from an oil spill. Because of the scope and duration of the restoration program, lingering oil and its effects were discovered and tracked. As a result, we know that risk assessment for future spills must consider what the total damages will be over a longer period of time, rather than only the acute damages in the days and weeks following a spill…”

Harry FullerA newsman since 1969, Harry Fuller has worked for CBS, ABC, CNBC Europe, CNET and was founding news director at TechTV. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Harry Fuller

Subscribe to GreenTech Pastures via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 5 Talkback(s)
a self justifying committee
While I accept that there may be some affects still around after all this time, I am always highly suspicious of any committee or other group whose existence requires a negative report. Amazingly, there always seems to be a negative report. Shock. Surprise. Not!... (Read the rest)
Posted by: wizardjr Posted on: 03/25/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
worse  Monosdeja | 03/24/09
Actually, no, this isn't what happens  Lerianis | 03/24/09
More money please  Kyser Soze | 03/25/09
Drunk Driving Kills  Dr_Zinj | 03/25/09
a self justifying committee  wizardjr | 03/25/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads