On TV.com: CHUCK Spied a Return Date
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

February 20th, 2008

Researcher: forgot those solar panels, get back into the lab

Posted by Harry Fuller @ 3:17 pm

Categories: Blogroll, air pollution, building, climate change, conservation, energy, engineering, environmental health, fossil fuel, global warming, green tech, renewable energy, research, solar

Tags: Green Technology, Photovoltaics, Greenhouse Gas, Externality, Analysis, Current Solar Panel Technology, Manufacturing, Harry Fuller

A new study from a UC Berkeley researcher is good news for VCs, Silicon Valley and other centers of green tech innovation. It’s equally glum news for the current pruveyors of solar panels. Current solar panel technology is not worth installing, it’s a waste of money according to Severin Borenstein, a professor at the University of
California, Berkeley’s Haas School of Business and director of the UC Energy
Institute.

You can read Borenstein’s analysis here.

In addition to more solar tech research that bring a major breaktrough in efficiency, Borenstein wants a better marketing system. Currently electricity always cost the same regardles off time of day or time of year. Here’s how his press summary puts it:
“However, the premium value of solar PV could be from 30 percent to 50 percent higher if U.S. systems were run with less capacity and prices were allowed to rise as demand increases at different times of the day, said Borenstein, who has long advocated for such variable time pricing. He noted that U.S. systems typically operate with excess
capacity and that consumers pay the same price for electricity at all times
of the day.”

Borenstein does not try to estimate the cost of greenhouse gases released by traditional fossil-fuel generation systems. But does say the savings would have to be huge to make solar electricity a financial win: “The analysis does not incorporate valuation of externalities, or the reduction of externalities
from other generation technologies, but the results speak to the level of such
non-market value that would be necessary to make the social cost-benefit analysis favorable.
‘This cost-benefit gap is much greater than plausible estimates of the value of
greenhouse gas reduction from solar PV generation.”

Harry FullerA newsman since 1969, Harry Fuller has worked for CBS, ABC, CNBC Europe, CNET and was founding news director at TechTV. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Harry Fuller

Subscribe to GreenTech Pastures via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 2 Talkback(s)
RE: Researcher: forgot those solar panels, get back into the lab
Prof. Borenstein does not estimate the cost associated with consumption of fossil fuel with respect to the political price. I'm thinking along the lines of war on terror, and associated costs. Factor that in!... (Read the rest)
Posted by: talushaben@... Posted on: 02/26/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Borenstein's report is focused on financials only, out-of-context  scyang@... | 02/24/08
RE: Researcher: forgot those solar panels, get back into the lab  talushaben@... | 02/26/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here