On CHOW: Turkey recipes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 12th, 2008

How Tough is Ozone Crackdown by Feds

Posted by Harry Fuller @ 10:11 pm

Categories: Blogroll, air pollution, cars & traffic, environmental health, federal government, fossil fuel, green tech, law & politics, mass transit, petroleum, state government

Tags: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ozone, Harry Fuller

The E.P.A. actually says it is tightening rules against ozone, and that many urban counties in the United States now frequently have air that is unhealthy to breathe. Specifically 345 counties in California, the Northeast and scattered across urban parts of the U.S. will now have tighter anti-ozone regulations. Some particularly dirty air hot spots like Los Angeles don’t even meet the older, looser ozone standards. Don’t fret, violators can get more jail time for passing a bad check than polluting the air we have to inhale.

Here’s the EPA’s take on why ozone is not good for living things. Ozone is a must-have ingredient anytime you want to produce smog.

Here’s the EPA’s up-to-the-day map of where the air;s fine, where it’s not.

The EPA says any expense needed to meet the new standards would be more than off-set by the savings from fewer sick and dying humans in the polluted places. There was no comment on what effect $20/gallon gasoline might have on cleaning up the ozone problem in many of the most polluted counties. Of course, power plants, cement plants and factories contribute their share of ozone in addition to that from internal combustion.

Many environmental groups complain the EPA did not follow the recommendations of its own scientific staff which wanted even tougher anti-ozone regs. The American Lung Association was hoping for tough standards as were many of their lobbying allies. But then “Lung Associaton,” you can see where they’re coming from. The name says it all. Not really concerned about how much money sonme cement companhy or utility makes. Some business lobby groups complain even this move by gthe EPA is too costly.

And naturally this ruling plays into the on-going battle over the EPA’s refusal to let states set their own, tougher anti-smog regulations for internal combustion engines. So smog is bad, but we won’t let you put any hardship ln the auto industry. Thanks, EPA. You folks are champs!

Harry FullerA newsman since 1969, Harry Fuller has worked for CBS, ABC, CNBC Europe, CNET and was founding news director at TechTV. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Harry Fuller

Subscribe to GreenTech Pastures via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 16 Talkback(s)
Would increaase PM
More wind would increase the Paticulant Matter (PM) another no-no; but all the web cam's they have available are pretty neat; particurly like the view from the Grand Canyon: Read the rest)
Posted by: tcubed@... Posted on: 03/14/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Electric Vehicles  NiraliSherni | 03/13/08
Electric Vehicles? Depends...  tmkent@... | 03/13/08
Of course they do.  frgough | 03/13/08
You do realize  frgough | 03/13/08
What about my kids?  philpenn | 03/13/08
Conundrum.  ShadeTree | 03/13/08
The story is straight.  frgough | 03/13/08
I get the sarcasm  philpenn | 03/13/08
Depends on where it is  John L. Ries | 03/13/08
Well then instead of reducing .....  ShadeTree | 03/13/08
Maybe use a very large fan?  John L. Ries | 03/13/08
Would increaase PM  tcubed@... | 03/14/08
The answer is simple  frgough | 03/13/08
Doesn't work in lower atmosphere  John L. Ries | 03/13/08
Sources and Destinations  Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/13/08
What ever happened to the Volvo Radiator that eats ozone  rpwillia0@... | 03/13/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here