On mySimon: The Biggest Box Sets
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

April 13th, 2008

Biofuels, the debate continues

Posted by Harry Fuller @ 10:51 am

Categories: Latin America, air pollution, biofuel, building, energy, environmental health, federal government, fossil fuel, law & politics, petroleum, recycling, renewable energy

Tags: Food, Natural Gas, Nature.com, Food & Beverage, Telecom & Utilities, Manufacturing, Harry Fuller

Nature.com has an interesting take on American governmental mandate for more biofuels. You’ll have to pay to read the whole piece, but all the talkbacks are free and some quite thoughtful. They come from enemies, friends and interested observers of the whole biofuel issue. Corn lovers to corn haters.

Maybe Congress just wants a “biofuel source that would leave us still dependent on fossil fuels and wouldn’t hold a significant advantage”?

“In Vancouver, we have a wonderful land-fill to gas plant in operation where we capture the released methane from decomposing organic waste from our landfill…”

“Corn-ethanol is expensive and sugarcane-ethanol is cheeper [sic]. If US remove the taxes imposed to the brazillian ethanol the price of the liquid fluel in US would go down and US would have enogh ethanol till cellulose works.” [This doesn't take into account the economic imperative in places like Brazil to demolish the rain forest to grow sugar cane to power American SUVs, of course.]

Biofuels: “They’re more or less carbon neutral, but never carbon-negative” would be true if it did not require natural gas for fertilizers, diesel for shipping, and field operations, and coal for dehydrating the ethanol, (natural gas is too expensive). When these are factored in ethanol does little, or even increases GHGs.”

I’ve blogged elsewhere on the food v. fuel debate swirling around biofuels. Crops like sugar cane and corn and rapeseed are often grown on the same fertile land that could, perhaps should, produce food for man or other beasts.

Just did blog on the clever plan to re-use cooking oils for vehicle fuel on large scale. And I’ve blogged about my fav: buffalo grass that can power cars as well as bison.

I don’t see myself as much of prognosticator, but I do expect this debate over biofuel, it’s stature as an economic or environmentally positive enegy source and the ethics of food or fuel to just become more heated. Too bad there’s no way to capture all THAT human energy.

Harry FullerA newsman since 1969, Harry Fuller has worked for CBS, ABC, CNBC Europe, CNET and was founding news director at TechTV. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Harry Fuller

Subscribe to GreenTech Pastures via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 5 Talkback(s)
RE: Biofuels, the debate continues
There are too many companies who want the 'Status Quo' and provide very little space for a small innovative company.
For the past six months (and many years before that period) I have been 'shoutin... (Read the rest)
Posted by: sternh@... Posted on: 04/19/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
bio-fuels are the BIGGEST environmental threat  wackoae | 04/13/08
...  Linux User 147560 | 04/14/08
RE: Biofuels, the debate continues  Charlie Peters | 04/13/08
RE: Biofuels, the debate continues  sternh@... | 04/19/08
RE: Biofuels, the debate continues  sternh@... | 04/19/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More