On CBS.com: Play Survivor Video Trivia Now
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

ZDNet Must Read:

February 2013 - The date when Firefox could pass Internet Explorer

Mark this date in your diaries and on your calendars: February 2013. It's my best guess date based on the data I have for when Firefox's global market share will... Continued »

November 23rd, 2009

Is Apple being too precious about the App Store?

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 6:54 am

Categories: Apple

Tags: Developer, Apple Inc., App, Tools & Techniques, Management, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Phil Schiller, Apple’s senior vice president for worldwide product marketing, talks about the App Store approval process. But is the process too cumbersome, tedious and does Apple take too much responsibility for the content of apps?

Speaking to BusinessWeek, here’s what Schiller had to say about the App Store approval process:

Most are approved and some are sent back to the developer. In about 90% of those cases, Apple requests technical fixes–usually for bugs in the software or because something doesn’t work as expected, Schiller says. Developers are generally glad to have this safety net because usually Apple’s review process finds problems they actually want to fix, he says.

In some 10% of cases where an app is sent back, that’s because it’s inappropriate. “There have been applications submitted for approval that will steal personal data, or which are intended to help the user break the law, or which contain inappropriate content,” Schiller says.

About 1% or fewer of returned apps fall into some gray area that Apple hasn’t anticipated–for instance, applications intended to help the user cheat at gambling in casinos. “We had to go study state and international laws about what’s legal and what isn’t, and what legal exposure that creates for Apple or the customer,” Schiller says. The verdict: Apps that help a user learn how to play are O.K.; those designed to help a person cheat don’t make the cut.

Apple is also vigilant about potentially illegal use of trademarks, particularly its own. “If you don’t defend your trademarks, in the end you end up not owning them,” Schiller says. “And sometimes other companies come to us saying they’ve seen their trademarks used in apps without permission. We see that a lot.” Still, the trademark rules can be applied inflexibly, he concedes.

So let’s get this straight. Apple tests the software and reports bugs back to developers. It also trawls the law books trying to figure out the legality of other apps. Oh, and it also polices trademarks.

Why?

After all, Apple’s App Store is just an outlet for apps. Why is the company taking it upon itself to work its way through the 10,000 or so apps submitted to the App Store each week?

The answer: Apple likes to have an iron-fist grip on its platform.

Problem is, not everyone likes to be subject to such tyrannical policies. Take Facebook developer Read the rest of this entry »

November 20th, 2009

Chrome OS - The good, the bad and the ugly, and how it fits in with Windows, Mac and Linux

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 5:34 am

Categories: Hardware, Software

Tags: Google Inc., Apple Macintosh, Operating System, Operating Systems, Microsoft Windows, Linux, Software, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

After yesterday’s Google Chrome OS announcement I’ve had a little time to think about Google’s vision for the OS and how it fits in with Windows, Mac and Linux.

The Good

There’s a lot I like about Chrome OS because it sound different enough and radical enough to maybe get people thinking a little differently about what an OS is and how it relates, how to secure it, how it interacts with the hardware and how the user interacts with the it. Certainly the way that Google plans to make Chrome OS speedier and more secure shows that there’s been a lot of out of the box thinking going on.

Note: What was interesting at yesterday’s announcement was that during the Q&A session at the end how many of the tech press questions and comments seemed to want to drag the project back from being radical and make it into what we already have,

For example, take changes to the boot sequence …

… verified boot …

… and how easy it is to re-image the OS following malware or corruption …

There’s also tight integration with Google’s massive array of online apps. Now, depending on how you view Google this can either be a good thing or a very bad thing. However, it’s hard to deny that a machine where all your data and settings are synced to the cloud for both storage and security is a very interesting way to mitigate data and system loss disasters. The idea that your data isn’t tied to a particular system is interesting, and the idea that all local data is encrypted is also very interesting.

I also like the fact that Google has made the project truly open source and is allowing outside developer involvement. Actually, I think it’s been done at exactly the right time too - some of the framework has been put in place, but now the project can evolve. It’ll be interesting to see where it goes.

The Bad, the ugly –>

November 19th, 2009

Google Chrome OS announcement

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 10:09 am

Categories: Software

Tags: Google Inc., Operating System, Google Chrome, Operating Systems, Software, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Highlights from the Google Chrome OS announcement today.

  • No launch, beta or devices today (contrary to what was being reported on some outlets)
  • Chrome OS a year away
  • Project goes fully open-sourced today
  • Just over a year since Chrome browser launch - 40 million regular users
  • 39x faster JavaScript compared to IE8
  • Over past year, Chrome browser updated 19 times
  • Chrome browser for Mac and Linux coming, as are extensions
  • Google want Chrome OS to access GPU, have better access to system resources
  • Perfect storm of converging trends - Netbook growth, cloud, laptop and netbook becoming more like phones, phones becoming smarter, overall increase in mobility
  • Google Chrome OS focuses on three things - Speed (”fast like a TV”), Simplicity, Security
  • On Chrome OS, every app is a web app, simple to use, easy to maintain
  • All data on Chrome OS is in the cloud
  • “If I lose my Chrome OS machine, I should be able to go out and buy another and be up and running in minutes …” No local data
  • Cold reboot demo - to logon screen in 7 sec, full OS in another 3 sec
  • Chrome OS looks like Chrome browser
  • Applications can be pinned as favorite applications “tabs”
  • All data stored in the cloud in Google Docs
  • Streaming music from YouTube
  • Google OS make good entertainment platform
  • Reading ebooks
  • Microsoft has been working on a killer app for Chrome OS … Office Web App ;)
  • “Want computers to be delightful and work”
  • Looking through USB flash drive:
  • All Chrome OS storage based on solid state drives
  • Speed improvements based on following changed:
  • Verified boot to improve security:
  • Reboot to recover - reimaging on the fly:
  • Security for an Internet age

  • User data on machine is always encrypted and always synced to the cloud - local data is just a cache
  • “Not another OS, but choice for users”
  • Google working with OEMs to come up with reference hardware (SSDs, WiFi cards … etc …)
  • Target time frame - end of 2010, for Holiday market
  • Google want larger netbooks with larger keyboards, touchpads etc
  • Chrome OS not downloadable - will have to buy a Chrome OS device … hmmm
  • Developers can get Chrome OS running on a netbook today - ”You need a screwdriver”
  • Flash works, YouTube works …
  • Here’s a video for you:
  • Expect to have prices in the price range people are used to today …
  • Google Chrome OS device will be a web-based “companion” device
  • There will be some things the device will not do
  • Everything that works in Chrome browser, works in Chrome OS (codecs etc)
  • “A lot of what you see in Chrome OS will make its way into Chrome”
  • Initially focused on netbook form-factor devices, in future could run on laptops and desktops
  • Will Chrome OS run on non-Intel (x86) platforms such as ARM? - Yes
  • Printers - “We’re taking an innovative approach, more next year. Yes, Chrome OS will print”

The announcement is now winding down (Q&A) so a few personal thoughts:

  • Chrome OS sounds interesting but the device reference platform means that unless hardware vendors unify netbook platforms, it’s not a real competitor for Microsoft/Apple
  • Chrome OS is definitly aimed at people who are deeply rooted in Google web apps …
  • I like the security model, and the cloud-based data and settings system is a nice idea, especially for people who lose/break devices regularly
  • Biggest hurdle I see - connectivity, and how the device will work when not hooked to the web

Thoughts?

November 19th, 2009

GIMP dropped from default Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx installation

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 7:25 am

Categories: Linux

Tags: Ubuntu, GIMP, Iso standards, Process Improvement, Quality, Business Operations, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Image editing tool GIMP is to be dropped from the default installation of Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx.

There are a number of reasons cited for this change:

  • the general user doesn’t use it
  • its user-interface is too complex
  • it’s an application for professionals
  • desktop users just want to edit photos and they can do that in F-Spot
  • it’s a photoshop replacement and photoshop isn’t included by default in Windows…
  • it takes up room on the disc

I’m guessing that Ubuntu’s ISO footprint was a big reason for the drop, because the more you add to the OS, the more megabytes are eaten up, and when you need that ISO to fit onto a CD, something might have to give.

I don’t see this being much of a problem though, as it’s a pretty straightforward task to download and install applications. And for those folks that don’t need GIMP, there’s always F-Spot there to pick up the slack.

Do people use GIMP, or is it too complex?

November 19th, 2009

Apple Tablet - Unofficial, unannounced ... but still delayed

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 6:27 am

Categories: Apple, Hardware, In the news

Tags: Apple Inc., DigiTimes, Tablets, Notebooks, Hardware, Notebooks & Tablets, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

It hasn’t been announced it yet, heck, there’s not even any official confirmation of its existence yet, but that doesn’t stop rampant speculation that the Apple’s tablet PC has been delayed until the second half of 2010.

DigiTimes has the info:

“Apple reportedly plans to postpone the launch of its tablet PC from an original March launch schedule to the second half of 2010, as the vendor has decided to switch some components and plans to launch a model using a 9.7-inch OLED panel from LG Display, according to sources from component makers.”

Bottom line, parts will be cheaper come H2 ‘10, which makes sense but then again I don’t see why Apple would “delay” a tablet because of this, given that it’s pretty apparent (especially to a big OEM like Apple) that components get cheaper over time. That’s just common sense.

Should we take reports that a rumored product has been delayed seriously?

November 19th, 2009

Radeon HD 5970 - ATI's killer graphics card

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 5:39 am

Categories: AMD/ATI, Gaming, Graphics, Hardware

Tags: Card, Video Card, ATI Technologies Inc., Graphics, Radeon, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Thought that ATI’s Radeon HD 5870 is a killer graphics card? Well you ain’t seen nothing yet - until you’ve seen the Radeon HD 5970.

So, what’s the big deal about the Radeon HD 5970? Well, it’s basically a Radeon HD 5870 part but with two “Cypress” GPUs on a single printed circuit board (PCB). You can think of the HD 5970 as the X2 version of the HD 5870 in much the same way that we saw X2 versions of the HD 3870 and HD 4870.

The spec of the HD 5970 is very impressive indeed:

The HD 5970 forms part of ATI’s “sweet spot” strategy:

What makes the HD 5970 so special - the dual Read the rest of this entry »

November 18th, 2009

Netbook/notebook reliability study shows that technology breaks ...

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 3:30 pm

Categories: Trends

Tags: Accident, Laptop Computer, Netbook, Hardware Malfunction, Netbooks, Nettops & MIDs, Policies And Procedures, Notebooks, Hardware, Human Resources, Notebooks & Tablets

Interesting research by SquareTrade which looked at the failure rate of 30,000 notebooks and netbooks covered by SquareTrade Laptop Warranty plans.

Highlights from the study:

  • Looking at the first 3 years of ownership, 31% of laptop owners reported a failure to SquareTrade. Two-thirds of this failure (20.4%) came from hardware malfunctions, and one-third (10.6%) was reported as accidental damage.  
  • Netbooks are projected to have a 20% higher failure rate from hardware malfunctions than more expensive laptop computers.
  • ASUS and Toshiba were the most reliable manufacturers, with fewer than 16% having a hardware malfunction over 3 years.

Read the rest of this entry »

November 17th, 2009

GeForce GT 240 - NVIDIA's sub-$100 DirectX 10.1 graphics card

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 2:50 pm

Categories: Gaming, Graphics, Hardware, NVIDIA

Tags: Card, Video Card, Nvidia GeForce, NVidia Corp., Graphics, DirectX, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

You can get a lot of power for under $100 when it comes to GPUs nowadays, but NVIDIA have just launched the GeForce GT 240 - decent performance, low power consumption and a decent price.

OK, so what’s special about the GeForce GT 240? Well, to begin with, it fully supports DirectX 10.1, something which other high-end NVIDIA cards don’t do. Might seem a trivial point when you consider that ATI already have DirectX 11 parts out  been delayed until (NVIDIA’s Fermi has been delayed until 2010), but it’s darn hard to get hold of any Radeon HD 5870 or 5850 cards. Also, it’s early days for DirectX 11 anyway in terms of games.

OK, so it supports DirectX 10.1, what else is special about the GeForce GT 240? Well, it’s NVIDIA’s most powerful graphics card that doesn’t require an auxiliary PCIe power connector. This means no need to Read the rest of this entry »

November 17th, 2009

HP Pavilion Elite owner resorts to lawsuit over 'inherently defective' PC

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 7:37 am

Categories: Legal

Tags: Lawsuit, Hewlett-Packard Co., PC, Issue, HP Pavilion, Computer, Productivity, Desktops, Hardware, Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

The owner of an Pavilion Elite desktop PC is suing HP claiming the system he bought is ”inherently defective,” and regularly locks up within 20 minutes of use.

The lawsuit, filed in a California federal court last week, is seeking class-action status in order to allow other dissatisfied HP customers to seek remedy.

Note: Lawsuit here (PDF)

According to the lawsuit filed by Colorado resident Michael A. Kent, a range of Pavilion Elite desktop PC (e9150t, e9180f, e9180t, m9600t and m9650f) supplied with a “Truckee” motherboard manufactured by Pegatron Technology (an ASUS spin-off) and and an Intel i7 CPU, crash or lock up after a short period of use on a regular basis.

From the lawsuit:

“After operating the e9150t for approximately two weeks, Plaintiff’s computer began experiencing repeated disruptive failures including lock-ups, freezes, and blue screen errors, requiring him to reboot the computer.”

“The customer complaints identify manifestations of the defect that occur on HP Pavilion Elite series computers running Microsoft Windows XP and XP Professional, Windows 7 and Linux.”

I’ve watched this PR disaster unfold for a few weeks now. I first discussed the issue back at the end of September when the complaints thread on the HP support forum was 98 pages long. The thread is now Read the rest of this entry »

November 17th, 2009

Dance Microsoft Store employees, dance!

Posted by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes @ 6:30 am

Categories: Marketing, Microsoft

Tags: Employee, Microsoft Corp., Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Employees at Microsoft’s Mission Viejo store shake their booty …

I’m reminded of this …

(via Engadget … blame them for putting that into your head, not me.)

Adrian Kingsley-HughesAdrian is a technology journalist and author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology. He also runs a popular blog called The PC Doctor. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations

Want to get in touch? Got a tip? Feel free to drop me a note! I ALWAYS respect anonymity. I'm also on Twitter (@the_pc_doc)

Right to Reply: Should any industry representatives wish to comment on any posts on Hardware 2.0, I will be happy to publish their reply verbatim on this blog.

Subscribe to Hardware 2.0 via Email alerts or RSS.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

Most Popular Posts

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here